LONGECITY

A biological age that is about 30 years younger than chronological age is very impressive! So caloric intake is pretty strongly associated with your RDW results. Do you see this trend with your clients too?

While my bloodwork is pretty solid, there are some areas for improvement compared to yours. It’s funny how individual results can be. For example, my fasting glucose has always been between 80-86 mg/dl and has never gone outside that range (granted I haven't tested anywhere near as many times as you). Maybe this is due to my high activity level... but then again I’m not sure the trade-off is worth it as my RHR/HRV are not as good as yours.

A biological age that is about 30 years younger than chronological age is very impressive! So caloric intake is pretty strongly associated with your RDW results. Do you see this trend with your clients too?

 

While my bloodwork is pretty solid, there are some areas for improvement compared to yours. It’s funny how individual results can be. For example, my fasting glucose has always been between 80-86 mg/dl and has never gone outside that range (granted I haven't tested anywhere near as many times as you). Maybe this is due to my high activity level... but then again I’m not sure the trade-off is worth it as my RHR/HRV are not as good as yours.

Hi drew_ab, 22y younger, not 30! The theoretical maximal reduction (CA-BA) is about 20y

Yes on a calorie intake being correlated with a lower RDW in some clients, but that sample size is small, so I can't say if it's generally true. The only way to know is to do the experiment...

Yes, blood test results can be individual, but the key (imo) is testing many times/yr, and tracking year-to-year change for biomarkers of as many organ systems as possible...