2 replies to this topic

[caruga]

https://chatgpt.com/...d4-90287660de00

[pepsseeker618]

ai takes on stacks are usually pretty generic imo, it just parrots back whatever guidelines it was trained on. from my own time on glp-1s the biggest thing was protein first and keeping meals small, everything else felt like noise. your first post isn't showing up for me btw, just an ad placeholder, so i can't actually see what you're running

[caruga]

Let's see if this one works.

 

Nutritional Restoration Review

 

Or

 

https://drive.google...iew?usp=sharing

 

I have no issue with people's objections to AI and I understand where it comes from, but personally I find it a privilege to have unrestrained access to it and the reservoir of knowledge it effortlessly dispenses.

 

I'd be wary of dismissing it as a parrot and that you don't become one yourself by parroting how flawed it is. I've seen it at its worst; and at its best.

 

Years ago I used to churn searches on google scholar, sometimes fruitlessly, and it makes that effortless now.

 

I also don't think its output is poor. Sometimes google is naff when it capitulates to dispensing information that could misguide people - especially in regard to pharmaceuticals, it takes a bit of persuasion to convince it to mention specific dosing numbers.

 

ChatGPT hasn't done any such thing in years though. It 'knows' me to a satisfactory degree now, and the degree of quality of its output can be humbling.

 

It's still GIGO - if you type within your own human limitations it'll echo that and seem no more sophisticated than you are. It mirrors the user.

 

Thanks for giving it a try, let's see if these new links work now.

Edited by caruga, 30 September 2026 - 12:41 PM.