The standard view of the evolution of aging is that aging exists because natural selection operates more strongly on features of young animals than on features of old animals. A faster time to reproductive success will be selected over a slower time to reproductive success. This leads to the evolution of biological systems that are front-loaded for early efficiency, but that decay to become dysfunctional over time. Aging is near universal but not actually universal, however. For example, varieties of hydra are in fact immortal, exhibiting no loss of function over time. How to explain the existence of the few immortal species in the presently dominant view of the evolution of aging? Here, researchers build a model of the evolution of aging in which a runaway feedback loop leading to immortality is a possible outcome.
In recent years, senescence is increasingly understood as a process of damage accumulation that accelerates with age throughout an organism's lifespan. That understanding has rarely been introduced to senescence evolution theory. In classic models, including Mutation accumulation and Antagonistic pleiotropy, the intensity of selection over genes is determined by the timing of their effect on mortality. They conclude senescence evolution occurs because of weak selection on late-acting genes. Despite the success of these classic explanations, several phenomena have not been fully addressed. One is the existence of species exhibiting negligible senescence - mortality rate that remains constant with age.
Here we explore, consistent with recent evidence, an alternative model: where genes affect mortality throughout an organism's lifespan, and the shape of this effect determines selection. We expanded Hamilton's classic model of senescence evolution using these notions. Our model takes into account evolutionary dynamics between external mortality risk, potential mortality risk from internal damage, reproduction start age, and reproduction rate. The analysis of the model suggests biological limitations on reducing the potential mortality risk from internal damage can lead to a positive feedback loop in senescence evolution where genes that slow senescence can increase selection for further senescence retardation. Our model sheds light on several phenomena, not fully explained by classic theory, including Peto's paradox, Strehler-Mildvan correlation, and negligible senescence.
Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72988
View the full article at FightAging
