• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Want to be fat?


  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

#61 lucid

  • Guest
  • 1,195 posts
  • 65
  • Location:Austin, Tx

Posted 14 April 2007 - 12:34 AM

Scientists have identified the most clear genetic link yet to obesity in the general population as part of a major study of diseases funded by the Wellcome Trust, the UK's largest medical research charity. People with two copies of a particular gene variant have a 70% higher risk of being obese than those with no copies.

This brings up an interesting question that I was pondering when I read some article saying that 'diet doesn't work'. This large scale study found that people that people who diet do not have decreased mortality rates compared to those who don't diet. This obviously sounds pretty stupid and was in a sensational (non-scientific) news add, but it did bring up the question: What if obesity isn't the cause of increased risk of disease, but rather both obesity and increased risk of disease were causes of a certain set of genes... Oh well food for thought.

It is typically measured using body mass index (BMI)[

I would just like to say that the BMI is so unbelievably stupid, I can't believe it... I am in the obese category according to the BMI because I am 6'5 and 240 lbs. Yet I am probably 10% body fat which isn't obese. Its not even like I am a body builder, I am just a big guy...

Here is why it is stupid though:
BMI = 703 x Weight(lbs) / Height(in)^2
Ok and here is the trick: weight is effectively a function of our bodies volume, and volume is a function of height (volume = width x height x breadth). So you effectively have a cubic function on top divided by a square on the bottom. Therefore the bigger you are, the higher your BMI... [/EndRant]

So If BMI doesn't work right then the results of that study could be pretty scewed... The gene could control growth in general and no so fatness. Thanks.

#62 doug123

  • Guest
  • 2,424 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Nowhere

Posted 18 April 2007 - 03:33 AM

This seems to be "the" topic to discuss obesity, so hey:

Web MD: News Source

Posted Image

Obese Children: More Ear Problems?

Childhood Obesity May Increase Fluid Build-up in Ear

By Miranda Hitti

WebMD Medical News

Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD

April 16, 2007 -- Obese children may be more likely to have fluid build-up in the middle part of their ears.

So say South Korean researchers who studied childhood obesity and an ear problem called otitis media with effusion.

In otitis media with effusion, fluid builds up in the middle ear without causing pain, fever, or other ear infection symptoms.

Childhood obesity and otitis media with effusion are rising, but before now, no one had investigated whether the two conditions might be connected, note the researchers.

They included Jong Bin Kim, MD, who works in Seoul, South Korea, at Kyung Hee University's department of otorhinolaryngology.

Kim's team studied 273 Korean children aged 2-7, including 155 kids who had tubes surgically inserted in one or both of their ears to relieve otitis media with effusion.

The other 118 children had other operations for conditions unrelated to their ears.

Obesity and Otitis Media


Kim's team measured the children's height and weight. Using those figures, the researchers calculated the children's BMI (body mass index), which is used to gauge obesity.

Based on BMI, 65 children (42%) were obese, the study shows.

The researchers also measured total cholesterol and triglycerides (blood fats) in blood samples provided by the kids. Total cholesterol and triglycerides tend to rise with obesity.

Most of the children had normal levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides. But 19% had abnormally high total cholesterol levels and 35% had abnormally high triglyceride levels.

Obesity and high total cholesterol levels were more common among children who got the ear tubes than among other children.

High triglyceride levels weren't associated with otitis media with effusion.

"The finding suggests that childhood obesity could have an effect on the development of [otitis media with effusion]," write the researchers.

However, the study doesn't prove that childhood obesity or high levels of total cholesterol cause otitis media with effusion.

The study appears in the Archives of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery.

SOURCES: Kim, J. Archives of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery, April 2007; vol 133: pp 379-382. News release, JAMA/Archives.


© 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved.



#63 doug123

  • Guest
  • 2,424 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Nowhere

Posted 25 April 2007 - 08:15 AM

News Source: Playfuls.com

Posted Image

03:04 PM, April 24th 2007
by Mihai Alexandru

Obese individuals appear more likely to file workers’ compensation claims for injuries on the job, according to a report in the April 23 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals. A second report in the same issue suggests that older Americans with a body mass index (BMI) of between 25 and 30—considered to be overweight—may have a higher risk of disability but a lower risk of death than those with BMI in the recommended range of 18.5 to 25.

Obesity is an increasing public health problem and a risk factor for many chronic diseases and death, according to background information in the articles. Increased BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, has been shown to be associated with increased costs to employee health plans. Obese workers have up to 21 percent higher health care costs than those whose weight is in the recommended range. "Less is known about more direct costs of obesity to employers, such as work-related illness and injury," the authors write.

Truls Østbye, M.D., Ph.D., and colleagues at Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., studied 11,728 health care and university employees who completed at least one health risk assessment questionnaire—available yearly to all employees eligible for health benefits—between 1997 and 2004. The assessment included a measure of height and weight. Workers with a BMI of less than 18.5 were categorized as underweight; between 18.5 and 24.9, recommended weight; 25 to 29.9, overweight; 30 to 34.9, obesity class I; 35 to 39.9, obesity class II; and 40 or higher, obesity class III.


Over an average of three years of follow-up, workers with higher BMIs tended to have more workers’ compensation claims—those in the group with the highest BMI (40 or greater) had twice the rate of claims as those at the recommended weight. "Because the number of lost workdays and the costs per claim also increase rapidly with BMI, the effects of BMI on lost workdays and costs were even stronger," the authors write. "The number of lost workdays was almost 13 times higher, medical claims costs were seven times higher and indemnity claims costs were 11 times higher among the heaviest employees compared with those of recommended weight."

This association between BMI and claims was apparent for injuries or illnesses involving most parts of the body, but was most pronounced in claims related to the back, wrist or arm, neck or shoulder, and knee, foot or hip. The types of injuries most strongly related to BMI were sprain or strain, contusion or bruise, and pain or inflammation.

"Maintaining healthy weight not only is important to workers but should also be a high priority for their employers given the strong effect of BMI on workers’ injuries," the authors conclude. "Complementing general interventions to make all workplaces safer, work-based programs targeting healthy eating and physical activity should be developed and evaluated."

In the second study, Soham Al Snih, M.D., Ph.D., and colleagues at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, and colleagues studied 12,725 adults 65 years or older who were not disabled at the beginning of the study. At initial interviews, which occurred between 1982 and 1993, researchers gathered information about health conditions, demographic information and psychosocial characteristics. Blood pressure, height and weight, and physical function were also measured. Follow-up interviews, in person or by phone, were conducted annually for seven years.

Over the follow-up period, 3,570 participants became disabled, 2,019 died, and 5,681 were known to be alive and non-disabled. The average BMI was 26.4 for non-disabled individuals, 26.4 for disabled individuals and 25.7 for those who died. "Subjects with BMIs of lower than 18.5 [underweight] or 30 or higher [obese] at baseline were significantly more likely to experience disability during the follow-up period," the authors write. In contrast, those who had BMIs of 25 to 34.9—considered to be overweight—had a lower risk of death during the study compared with those whose BMIs were less than 25 or 35 or higher. "Disability-free life expectancy is greatest among subjects with a BMI of 25 to less than 30," they continue.

There are several possible explanations for the link between obesity and disability in the elderly, the authors note. "Obesity is associated with several conditions that, in turn, are risk factors for subsequent disability, including osteoarthritis of the weight-bearing joints, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease," they write. There are also several potential reasons for the weak link between obesity and death. For instance, BMI may not be an accurate measure of obesity in older adults. In addition, because obesity and death are clearly linked in younger adults, it is possible that individuals at risk of early death because of high BMI die before they reach age 65.

In addition, "obesity might have a protective effect at older ages that is less important at younger ages. This protective effect might counterbalance the known adverse consequences of obesity on survival." For instance, obesity might reduce the risk of hip fractures, or allow individuals who get sick to survive with a low calorie intake for a longer period of time.

"Assessments of the effect of obesity on the health of older Americans should account for mortality and incidence of disability," the authors conclude.



sponsored ad

  • Advert

#64 doug123

  • Guest
  • 2,424 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Nowhere

Posted 29 April 2007 - 06:32 AM

Dogflu.ca: News Source

Posted Image

An advocacy group wants Shrek removed from his role as spokesman for anti-obesity ads due to the fact that children will be exposed to junk food advertising from the upcoming movie release.

An advocacy group is stating that Shrek should be removed from his role as spokesman for anti-obesity ads.


The group known as the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood states that due to the soon to be released movie Shrek the Third being seen by millions of children, that they will be exposed to far to many links and ties to junk food companies in their advertising.

The advocacy group believes that this results in mixed messages for children, and increases their likelyhood of eating junk food instead of fruits and vegetables.

Susan Linn, the director of the group, stated that “Surely Health and Human Services can find a better spokesperson for healthy living than a character who is a walking advertisement for McDonald’s, sugary cereals, cookies and candy.”

HHS spokesman Bill Hall has stated that there are no plans to remove Shrek and no plans on changing their advertising campaign.

Hall stated that Shrek is a “very well known character in the target population of this campaign. We have always promoted a healthy diet which does not necesarily exclude the occasional treat.”




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users