• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Hormonal Test


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 glexia

  • Guest
  • 106 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Alicante (Spain)

Posted 06 March 2007 - 12:06 PM


I have done an hormonal test beacuse i have acne and menstrual imbalances. These are the results (only problems):

- T3 -------- 1180 pmol/24h (low) (800-2500) -------- >1500 doctor recomended
- T4 -------- 1030 pmol/24h (low) (550-3160) -------- >1800 doctor recomended

Doctor said pre-hypotiroidism.
Supplement: L- tyrosine.



- Cortisol ------13.6 micrograms/24 (low) (10-100) ------- 20-25 doctor recomended
Supplement: Siberian ginseng(Eleutherococcus senticosus)



-DHEA ------- 3.55 mg/24h (Very high) (0.04-0.82)
-Testosterone ---1.19 mg/24h (High) (0.24-0.90)
-Progesterone--- 3.66 mg/24h (High) (0.20-2.00)

Androgenic effects.
Supplements:
-Testo.Quench (Douglas)
-Fennel seeds(Foeniculum vulgare)
-Fenogreek seeds


Aldosterone------20.9 microgm/24h (Little high) (5.0-20)
Sodium-----------98.6 mEq/24h (little low) (100-220)
Magnesium ------127 mg/24h (little high) (60-120)



Any advice?

#2

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 06 March 2007 - 02:47 PM

Some doctors recommend supplementing iodine. Did your doctor say anything about iodine? You might try a skin patch test on your own to see how your body uses up iodine painted on a 2 inch square part of your body. If it absorbed within 24 hours then you should assume your body needs iodine. You can find "slow iodine" in some health food stores. The slow iodine is much better than applying a patch of iodine to your skin every day.

The right nutrition is important. The adrenals need zinc, and vitamin b6 is needed to break down proteins which then are made into hormones and other things. Women can have problems with b6 sometimes because it has to be converted in the liver to the active form. (Estrogen can cause a sluggish liver for some women.) You might try taking both forms, the pyrdoxine and p-5-p form. Pantethenic acid is also supposed to help the adrenals.

Your doctor does not believe in the William Jefferies approach to treating mild adrenal fatique with low dose natural cortisone. This might be something to ask about next time. I think the herbs don't work for that long. They are adaptagenic which means the body seems to get used to them. So the herbs may not be the most effective way. Licorice is also useful because it prevents the breakdown of cortisol in the liver. Some people even think that using DLG which has the active ingredient removed can still help with increasing energy levels. But if I take one capsule of licorice I will not sleep for 48 hours. Licorice does not work like those other herbs do so you might be careful with the dose if you do try it.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 ajnast4r

  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 147
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 06 March 2007 - 04:26 PM

i like your doctor

#4 glexia

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 106 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Alicante (Spain)

Posted 06 March 2007 - 11:11 PM

I asked him about iodine, but he told me that iodine may not be good for acné .

I take zinc and "female balance" of NOW . It has B6,more zinc, vitex,don quai..it seems to be good for my acné.

I didn´t know that thing about the herbs....and i have not read anything about William Jefferies ....i´m looking for information now

#5 ajnast4r

  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 147
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 07 March 2007 - 12:20 AM

why dont you just do what ur doctor told you... his recomendation seem to be pretty good to me

#6 doug123

  • Guest
  • 2,424 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Nowhere

Posted 07 March 2007 - 01:39 AM

I have done an hormonal test beacuse i have acne and  menstrual imbalances. These are the results (only problems):

- T3  --------  1180 pmol/24h  (low)          (800-2500)  --------  >1500 doctor recomended
- T4  --------  1030 pmol/24h  (low)          (550-3160) --------  >1800  doctor recomended

Doctor said pre-hypotiroidism.
Supplement: L- tyrosine.



- Cortisol ------13.6  micrograms/24 (low)      (10-100) -------  20-25  doctor recomended
Supplement: Siberian ginseng(Eleutherococcus senticosus)



-DHEA ------- 3.55 mg/24h  (Very high)          (0.04-0.82)
-Testosterone ---1.19  mg/24h  (High)            (0.24-0.90)
-Progesterone--- 3.66  mg/24h  (High)            (0.20-2.00)

Androgenic effects.
Supplements:
-Testo.Quench (Douglas)
-Fennel seeds(Foeniculum vulgare)
-Fenogreek seeds


Aldosterone------20.9  microgm/24h (Little high)          (5.0-20)
Sodium-----------98.6  mEq/24h  (little low)                  (100-220)
Magnesium ------127  mg/24h    (little high)                  (60-120)



Any advice?


You might consider continuing to monitor your hormone levels to watch to see if there are any changes. Once I had blood drawn and my thyroid levels were totally off the chart. I was referred to an endocrinologist. She did some tests and had me all geared up for some crazy thryoid medication...then my doctor had the wise idea to have my blood levels checked again. And guess what? They were back to normal. And then we tested again and the same thing -- my levels were fine.

Also: did you make sure to comply with the proper testing conditions for testing your hormones?

I'm not sure what rule might apply for hormone testing; however, when I have my blood drawn to perform routine testing for cholesterol, CBC, Diff./platelets, CMP, lipids, &c. -- you name it -- the doctor tells me to fast that morning until I get my blood drawn. So that means no food or drink with caloric value until after the blood is drawn in the morning! Obviously blood sugar and possibly several other systems involved in glucose metabolism may be modulated by my morning coffee with organic milk and manuka honey! It seems many of the human endocrine and other associated systems are tightly regulated by what you eat and your body will probably report differently under fasting condition than under other particular constraints. The bottom line is that basically if you eat before getting your blood drawn to perform these tests, the tests results are pretty much totally bunk -- or worthless. So I wonder if that's the case with hormones...I should check next time...

#7 wayside

  • Guest
  • 344 posts
  • -1

Posted 07 March 2007 - 02:24 AM

It seems many of the human endocrine and other associated systems are tightly regulated by what you eat and your body will probably report differently under fasting condition than under other particular constraints. The bottom line is that basically if you eat before getting your blood drawn to perform these tests, the tests results are pretty much totally bunk -- or worthless.


I have always wondered about this.

Since most of us aren't in a fasting state most of the time, where we haven't eaten or drank for 8-10 hours (not me, anyway, except for while I'm sleeping), why do we consider this the "valid" way to test ourselves?

Personally, I'm in a "has eaten within the last 3-5 hours" state for a much higher percentage of the time than I am in a "hasn't eaten for 8-10 hours" state. I would think the tests would be better/more useful if they reflect the state I am in most often.

#8 mitkat

  • Guest
  • 1,948 posts
  • 13
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 07 March 2007 - 02:40 AM

Unless you happen to be eating the same thing, all the time, your levels will be consistantly and possibly drastically different. Think of your glucose levels if you had a huge glass of orange juice directly before...that would be disproportionate of your body's actual state, unless you happened to be drinking orange juice 24/7 your entire life.

The tests are valid because your body is free of food and is displaying actual levels/contents/amounts/whatever of your body, irrelevant of what you've eaten recently that would throw it off, AFAIK. Someone please correct me I'm wrong, as this is how I've come to understand it.

#9 wayside

  • Guest
  • 344 posts
  • -1

Posted 07 March 2007 - 02:50 AM

The tests are valid because your body is free of food and is displaying actual levels/contents/amounts/whatever of your body, irrelevant of what you've eaten recently that would throw it off, AFAIK.


But if I am in a "recently eaten" state 80% of the time, and a "fasting" state only 20% of the time, wouldn't it more important to figure out your levels for the state you are in most of the time?

Or is it about reproducibility?

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#10 mitkat

  • Guest
  • 1,948 posts
  • 13
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 07 March 2007 - 02:56 AM

I understand what you're getting at wayside, and it's a damn good question. It may simply be about reproducibility (science loves that) and having some sort of reliable baseline to compare to. [thumb] Hopefully someone else can chime in on this.

I didn´t know that thing about the herbs....and i have not read anything about William Jefferies ....i´m looking for information now


I too am impressed your doctor told you about herbal supplements...I would imagine they'd of just offered you some pills to take instead. Investigate them, and ask back here if you can't find any good info.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users