• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo

Palm Pilot Inventor Figures out How Brain Works


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 maestro949

  • Guest
  • 2,350 posts
  • 4
  • Location:Rhode Island, USA

Posted 29 March 2007 - 05:30 PM


Not my realm but interesting. What do you AI buffs think? I was thinking that a good test for AI's are Captcha breakers. These are progressively getting more difficult. I saw one the other day that made you pick the pretty girl out of 4 pictures.


Jeff Hawkins, Who Invented PalmPilot, Says He's Figured Out How The Brain Works

By Mitch Wagner,
06:00 PM ET, Mar 28, 2007


You can't complain that Jeff Hawkins is falsely modest. Hawkins, whose last triumph was inventing the PalmPilot, claims to have solved the greatest problem in 60 years of computer science. He says he's figured out how the human brain works, and has built a model in software, with practical applications imminent. Not only that, he says he's released a lot of the code in open source.

Next up, no doubt, he'll announce antigravity, faster-than-light travel, communication with the dead, and that he's figured out what happens to socks when they disappear in the clothes dryer.

Hawkins, is co-founder of Numenta a company that is trying to build software that learns and thinks like the human brain. Solving that problem is a lifelong passion for Hawkins, pre-dating his triumph in the computer industry, when he co-founded Palm Computing and invented the first successful handheld computer.

He spoke at the O'Reilly ETech Emerging Technology Conference in San Diego.

Computers find it impossible to do things that human beings can do quickly, constantly and effortlessly. These tasks include recognizing images and speech. And, perhaps the biggest problem of all: Human beings adapt as they learn. We never do anything twice the same way, even trivial things like picking up a cup of coffee. Machines have to do the same thing the same way every time, Hawkins said.

Can a machine be made that thinks like a human brain? Yes, says Hawkins, because human brains can do it and they do it without magic. "We know we can do the, because we all have brains and do them," said Hawkins.

Hawkins says that the human brain's function isn't mysterious, or hard to figure out. So why hasn't it been done before? There are several theories.

One theory is that computers aren't powerful enough to behave like brains. We used to hear that theory a lot 15-20 years ago, not so much today, Hawkins said.

Another theory: Human brains are too complex. But that's not a reason why we don't understand them, it's simply a cause, Hawkins said. Complexity is a symptom of lack of understanding, not a cause. Things look complicated when we can't figure out how they work; once they're figured out, they're simple. The Solar System looked like a complicated place hundreds of years ago, with planets dancing around each other in complex epicycles; but once the theory of universal gravitation emerged, astronomers realized that the planets were all moving around the Sun in simple ellipses, governed by a few simple equations.

Another theory: Brains work on some theory we don't understand, often quantum principles.

Still another theory: Thinking is supernatural, due to the presence of the soul.

But Hawkins rejects those theories. The brain is no different from, and no less understandable than, other parts of the body, he said. "Brains are made up of cells, just like the liver," he said.

The interesting parts of the brain, involving seeing, language functions, and other things that make us human, occurs in the neocortex, a thin layer of cells covering the top part of the brain, about the thickness and surface area of a table napkin. He waved around a hotel table napkin to illustrate his point.

The cells of the neocortex are not differentiated. "Everywhere you look at the neocortex, it looks the same," he said. And yet different parts of the brain do different things. This is due to different kinds of connections between parts of the brain.

Numenta's software model of the brain is Hierarchical Temporal Memory, or HTM. It learns by experiencing sense data, the same way people do. It builds a model of the world based on sensory input, and maps new input onto that model. Nodes of the software look at common spatial patterns. If "A" and "B" happen together, the node assumes a common cause. It gives the sequence a name, and passes it up to a higher node. The higher node looks for higher level patters, and passes that information up to a yet higher node, and so forth. This emulates the way the human brain screens out and ignores irrelevant information, Hawkins said.

The memory model is implemented in software called the Numenta Platform for Intelligent Computing, or NuPIC. the runtime environment scales from a single-CPU laptop to big cluster, Hawkins said. Numenta also offers Python development tools, and algorithms in Python or C++. Source code for the tools and algorithms are available.

He showed slides that illustrate how the software can recognize simple symbols that look like hieroglyphics, even when they're sloppy or incomplete. The company is working on tools to recognize grayscale images.

Applications include automotive, gaming, network modeling, drug discovery, vision systems, market analysis, and business modeling. Automotive companies are interested in using the technology to enable cars equipped with sensors to detect potentially dangerous conditions. The company is working on building a community of developers on its Web site to advance the technology.


Source: Information Week

#2 treonsverdery

  • Guest
  • 1,312 posts
  • 161
  • Location:where I am at

Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:38 PM

This has little to do with AI other than suggesting that pointing AI at mass consumer activities could be beneficial


Automotive companies are interested in using the technology to enable cars equipped with sensors to detect potentially dangerous conditions

You know what would be fun, software that predicts what kind of cars people will prefer at any given efficiency rating. I was thinking recently that cars should have passenger modules like handyphones have appearence plates. as a nondriver the difference between vehicles that posh vs adequate at same HP just seems to be the area the driver views n the furniture If there were an equation that said ok, these cars all get more than 70 MPG whats the amount of "cab splendor" that creates different valuations plus think how fun it would be to create the data I mean you could start with a bare cab, then go to inflatable furniture with optically detected variation of puffy inflatable wheel n pedal positions
Posted Image Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
I saw an online ref that notes Ford revenue is near $170 billion I feel that SUVs get worse mileage than the 1959 VW bug as a result of the "cab splendor" ideation A million dead during this most recent oil war suggests that a way to predict ways to create visually appealing cars that meet CAFE standards while upping revenue matters

Automotive companies are interested in using the technology to enable higher mileage cars that earn companies more money

Reagan removed cafe standards which if they had remained would have reduced fuel consumption near half, more than the US imports from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and perhaps a few West hemisphere countries combined. Naughty Reagan. Allegedly a free markteer his decision to protect the poor weak sad unable to compete auto industry created numers wars, millions of dead, what might be a trillion dollar midlle east futility.

Thinking about the actual technology of The cells of the neocortex are not differentiated. "Everywhere you look at the neocortex, it looks the same," he said. And yet different parts of the brain do different things. This is due to different kinds of connections between parts of the brain. It will be nifty to create genetic models of different amount n timing of differentiation with mammals to find out if they are cleverer.

Edited by treonsverdery, 29 March 2007 - 09:37 PM.


sponsored ad

  • Advert

#3 maestro949

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,350 posts
  • 4
  • Location:Rhode Island, USA

Posted 05 April 2007 - 11:38 AM

There's just not enough time in the day. This looks like it would be fun to download and play around with.

Jeff Hawkins, co-founder of Palm and Handspring, has started a new company, called Numenta, to test his controversial theory of intelligence. Whether you find his theory plausible or not, his book, "On Intelligence" is fascinating. Numenta is attempting to build A.I.s using Hawkins' theory as a backbone. They've developed a software engine and a Python-based API, which they've made public (as free downloads), so that hackers can start playing. They've also released manuals, a whitepaper (pdf) and videos [1] [2]. (At about 30:18 into the first video, Hawkins demonstrates, with screenshots, the first app which uses his system.)


Jeff Hawkins unleashes his brain: Numenta's new AI platform

Video Link #1

Video Link #2

Developer's Forum

#4 caston

  • Guest
  • 2,141 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 05 April 2007 - 05:35 PM

Very interesting. I'll lap up anything like this as I still want to explore my crazy idea that the brain controls programmed ageing.

#5 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 06 April 2007 - 01:00 AM

If "A" and "B" happen together, the node assumes a common cause.

Brilliant! He's invented my next door neighbor!

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#6 chubtoad

  • Life Member
  • 976 posts
  • 5
  • Location:Illinois

Posted 05 October 2008 - 02:23 AM

The whole idea seems to depend on the fact that the neocortex looks the same anywhere you look. Can any of the brain experts here way in on that? What is it exactly that is the same?
Anyway here are some youtube clips added in the last few months.

The TED talk:


The long version:





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users