• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

No scientific evidence diet supplements work


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 trance

  • Guest
  • 335 posts
  • 112
  • Location:Dallas, Tx

Posted 09 April 2007 - 05:47 PM


No scientific evidence diet supplements work

Story Highlights

• Americans spend at least $5.8 billion dollars a year on dietary supplements
• Studies have found virtually no evidence supplements improve health your health
• Testing for safety, effectiveness not required for nutritional supplements

By Caleb Hellerman
CNN

ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- Every morning, Dr. Frank Pinto pops not one or two vitamins, not just a handful, but more than two dozen dietary supplements, washing each one down with a sip of water.

When afternoon rolls around, he takes 20 more: all told, nearly 50 pills, every day. Pinto, a dermatologist, and his wife, Rosemary, a family therapist, are chasing life with a vengeance under the guidance of Dr. Ana Casas, an Atlanta-based specialist in "age management."

Like millions of Americans, the Pintos, who live in Tifton, Georgia, take supplements in hopes of gaining energy, warding off disease and slowing down the aging process. The federal government says Americans spend at least $5.8 billion a year on dietary supplements.

To look at the labels, you would think that vitamins and supplements are powerful medicine. Yet for all the money spent, and growing interest from mainstream physicians, virtually no evidence exists that supplements can improve your health.

Under the 1994 Dietary Supplement and Health Education Act, nutritional supplements do not have to be tested for safety or effectiveness before going on the market. As long as the manufacturer doesn't claim that a product treats or cures a specific disease, it can advertise any health benefit whatsoever. The next time you're in a health food store, just count the bottles that promise to "strengthen your immune system."

When studies have been done -- conducted by academic researchers, not supplement-makers -- the results are less than impressive. Here are just a few examples:

Vitamin E: In a massive study two years ago involving nearly 40,000 women, the famed Women's Health Initiative found that taking vitamin E supplements they did nothing to improve cardiovascular health or prevent cancer.

Ginkgo biloba:The popular memory aid didn't help 230 people OVER 60 who were tested by Williams College researchers in a 2002 study.

Coenzyme Q10:According to the Web site of the National Cancer Institute, "Coenzyme Q10 has not been carefully tested to see if it is safe and effective."

Or take the whole category of antioxidants. Researchers have long known that a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, which are full of antioxidants, can lower blood pressure and the risk of heart disease and cancer. Such a diet has even been shown to lengthen life.

With that in mind, millions of people, including Pinto, pop capsules of vitamin C, vitamin E and beta carotene. A lot of them were probably stunned to see a study last January, in which Danish researchers found that taking antioxidants in pill form might actually shorten life, not extend it.

Dr. Jeffrey Blumberg is director of the Antioxidants Laboratory at the Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, at Tufts University in Boston, Massachusetts. He says researchers are only beginning to understand the complexity of food. "There are about 20,000 different antioxidants in our diet.

There aren't 20,000 different pills to take," Blumberg says. "One of the reasons dietary supplements can't replace a healthful diet is because we don't know about what's important to put in every pill."

Dr. Andrew Weil, the alternative medicine guru and author of best-sellers including "Healthy Aging," runs a Web site devoted to selling pharmaceutical-quality vitamins, but agrees that advertising often oversimplifies what pills can do.

"There's a compound in broccoli called sulphurophane, which has been of interest as a cancer-fighting agent, and I have seen bottles in health food stores that have a photo of a bunch of broccoli on the label, and the implication is that this is broccoli in a pill," complains Weil. "It's not broccoli in a pill. It's sulphurophane in a pill, and that's one element of an incredibly complex plant that has all sorts of different things in it."

But Weil isn't willing to wait for scientists to sort it out. He says he has enough anecdotal evidence to recommend several supplements, including vitamin D and selenium to reduce the risk of cancer, alpha lipoic acid to fight off heart disease and diabetes and omega-3 fish oil for brain function and blood circulation. All of those, no surprise, are on Pinto's list. Like Weil, the Georgia physician says he's not waiting for the jury to come in.

But he believes supplements are not a cure-all, either. "It's an all-inclusive thing. If you don't eat right and exercise, supplements are not a replacement."

Caleb Hellerman is a senior producer with CNN Medical News.


Find this article at:

http://www.cnn.com/2...ents/index.html

#2 proteomist

  • Guest
  • 177 posts
  • 1

Posted 09 April 2007 - 05:54 PM

Here's an SAT question:

MTV is to music as CNN is to ....?

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 health_nutty

  • Guest
  • 2,410 posts
  • 94
  • Location:California

Posted 09 April 2007 - 06:40 PM

The same 'news' agency the happily reports that green tea cuts cancer risk, pomegranate juice lowers heart attack risk, etc., etc. News is now nothing more than sensationalism.

On the flip side you do have to be careful about what you take. 99% of supplements have false claims (a waste of money at best), but there are some gems out there with some decent research behind them.

#4 Anthony_Loera

  • Life Member
  • 3,168 posts
  • 745
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 09 April 2007 - 08:01 PM

Very much agreed health_nutty...

From our experience my wife will happily state what Chinese herbs did for her about 23 months ago... when 2 specialists in 2 different hospitals told her of her 'impossible task' she was going through...

One specialist said the words 'it would be a miracle...' while trying to explain to her something she was simply not going to accept, even when I had already given up in my own head. I am still upset at him for making my wife cry...

But now, she and I now believe in the herbs she took after we dumped the doctors opinions, and the 'miracle' happened. With that 'miracle' it was the beginning of a new journey for us, and something that has moved our lives in a very different direction.

What do I take away from that whole experience? Keep on fighting for your health, your body, and your children even when the professionals have thrown in the towel.

I now understand that science simply tries to understand the everyday miracles that need explanation. Yes, science continues to have a long way to go to understand what makes the human body really tick.

Ok, I'll stop my rant now...

I just hate it when this kind of 'news' is given, which only leads the majority of people to rely on the physicians 'ultimatums' about their own health even more.

Just remember if something happens to you which you consider a serious health issue, or they tell you your body is to old to do... something. Do research, question everything, and never let a single physician tell you something about your health or your body using the words 'impossible...', or 'miracle...'.

Forget that guy, and request a 'few' second opinions... even if they lead you down the road to a Chinese physician and herbalist...

Ok, thats my 2 cents...

Anthony Loera

#5 kenj

  • Guest
  • 747 posts
  • 67
  • Location:Copenhagen.

Posted 09 April 2007 - 08:08 PM

There's some good stuff in that article, thx for posting, - IMO, many a bad habit is gonna diminish or completely *neutralize* the amazing benefits of heavy supplementation,
if people would maintain a low calorish, low AGE-ish diet to provide the ample energy, and maintain ones bodily functions through exercising (including -- "exercising"), and avoiding too many contaminated factors in daily life, sups can (AFAIK) reinforce our defence against the accumulating damage to DNA, structural proteins, general free radical activity, and upregulate hormone levels etc. to support the healthy, extended life.
I didn't take this seriously ten/y ago, - I have been for several y/now, but I consider it a slower adaptation.

Edited by kenj, 09 April 2007 - 08:23 PM.


#6 luv2increase

  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 09 April 2007 - 09:43 PM

Some things you have to learn to filter out. This is biased article.

"virtually no evidence exists that supplements can improve your health"

"Studies have found virtually no evidence supplements improve health your health"

They sure like the word 'virtually'. What is that supposed to mean. They talk about studies for Vitamin E, Ginkgo Biloba, and CoQ10. They are using 'possibly' negative studies for less than a handful of supplements and broadly overgeneralizing it to apply to ALL supplements. The Danish study was done on vitamin a, c, and e. Ok, so we have 5 total individual supps spoken of out of a whole lot more than that of supps.

Go here http://www.mindandmu...showtopic=27859 and look first and last post. The last post explains why the "massive" Danish study is very biased. It debunks the study very well. It is a good read.

There is a whole load of positive studies on CoQ10. I am surprised they listed it. I don't know so much about the ginkgo study, but there are a lot of positive ones.

This article is crap IMHO. It is sad that the majority of people who will read it will take it as gospel. It is propaganda against all supps. If the gov't wants to take away our supps, they have to get the majority of people to think negatively against them. This is one of the ways they do it. It is sad. That is 5.8 billion dollars that the gov't and pharm industries is missing out on.

#7 lucid

  • Guest
  • 1,195 posts
  • 65
  • Location:Austin, Tx

Posted 09 April 2007 - 10:09 PM

Well, I take a small hand full of sups that I have spent some time reading about etc... There are some real gems: fish oil, melatonin are a couple bullet proof ones imo. Pomegranate juice, tomato paste, ala & Acetyl L-Carotine seem like good choice.
*edit* Cocoa looks like a good choice too.
I think there is a little wisdom in the article that going with the actual plant may be better than the chemical. *edit*

Edited by lucid, 09 April 2007 - 10:41 PM.


#8 Athanasios

  • Guest
  • 2,616 posts
  • 163
  • Location:Texas

Posted 09 April 2007 - 10:23 PM

I don't know so much about the ginkgo study


Ginko takes a while before effectiveness is shown, like bacopa, so most studies fall short.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#9 mike250

  • Guest
  • 981 posts
  • 9

Posted 10 April 2007 - 07:48 AM

I always thought Ginko was an under-rated herb.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users