• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

Intelligence Enhancement


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 JonesGuy

  • Guest
  • 1,183 posts
  • 8

Posted 20 August 2003 - 04:10 PM


I am sure the information might have spread out by now, but are there any techniques that have received scientific study for increasing the various types of intelligence?

The psychologists might know ... but do you think they're telling [sfty] ?

Anyway, one thing I'm doing is slowly teaching myself to write with my off-hand. I've read, but only in mainstream news-sources, that learning new motor skills promotes new neural connections. My theory (and I don't really know anything about this) is that I might be creating better cross links and processing sites in my brain. If the right side of my brain is the "creative" side and my left hand is controlled by the right brain, then wouldn't activating the right brain help?

I'll say again, I don't know ANYTHING about this topic. I've never taken a psychology or neuroscience course. But I'm quite willing to do simple things to improve my brain. I figure, the more intelligence I have, the more I can do. I've also learned that motivation is important, too. Often more so. But, I'll beard that lion when I get to it.

So, any abstracts I could look at? Any suggestions?

ps: genetic intelligence enhancement in mice (I've only read the abstract, I'd like to know the longevity of these mice)
[>] http://www.ncbi.nlm....t&holding=f1000

pps: phosphatidylserine doesn't help memory in the elderly (in case your parents buy it)
[>] http://www.ncbi.nlm....t&holding=f1000

ppps: in fact, biomedcentral is a quick, easy resource for the people who don't know about it
https://www.biomedcentral.com/home/

#2 Lazarus Long

  • Life Member, Guardian
  • 8,116 posts
  • 242
  • Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York

Posted 20 August 2003 - 04:40 PM

Ahhh, yet another 12 step program; this time with the purported promise of overcoming our addiction to ignorance. :))

When I have the time I am looking forward to analyzing the links provided. [B)]

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#3 MichaelAnissimov

  • Guest
  • 905 posts
  • 1
  • Location:San Francisco, CA

Posted 21 August 2003 - 12:17 AM

The most cost-effective way to improve your brain nowadays, unfortunately, is still reading books and papers and staying away from harmful drugs. I would also suggest trying to obtain an EEG machine, or, if you can afford it, a fMRI machine, and studying the patterns of your own brainwaves. There may be the possibility of programs targetting youths, because the early part of life is where the brain does most of its rewiring, and would be most conducive to enhancement, but that sort of stuff takes too long.

The *actual* best way to enhance your intelligence would be to work towards creating a greater intelligence than yourself with positive morals, and then ask that intelligence to help you enhance your own intelligence. (www.singinst.org) That might be possible after five to twenty years of work, but everyone on Earth would get to benefit, profoundly. Focusing on obtaining or developing neurotechnology in the near future would be a powerful way to enhance intelligence, a far wiser path than anything you could do now, except for the fact that neurotechnology is going to lag behind AI research by a few years. Perhaps the first transhuman AI will be created with the assistance of some sort of neurotechnology, but I doubt we'll be able to get much further than personal fMRIs and TMS machines by then (which would confer profound increases in intelligence, but not enough to make us transhuman.)

One good way of increasing motivation is keeping track of what you accomplish each day and assigning ratings. Another important variable, aside from intelligence and motivation, is time management. Most of what people do during a normal day is absolutely useless for bettering their future. Newspapers aren't worth reading. 99% of TV isn't worth watching. Individuals of average intelligence are certainly worth being polite to, but not worth associating with regularly. A beer or two can fuzz your mind for 3-4 hours, time you could have otherwise spent on reading, writing, brainstorming, or chatting with us on these forums! And don't even get me started on the effects the dating game can have on a young man's intelligence, rationality, productivity and motivation...

Cognitive psychology and neuroscience are awesome topics, I would recommend diving into google and getting into a serious habit of information gluttony, if you haven't already.

#4 JonesGuy

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,183 posts
  • 8

Posted 27 August 2003 - 06:15 PM

Well, it's my old question.

Do I study intelligence enhancement so that I'm smart enough to battle aging?

OR

Do I battle aging so that in the future I can learn intelligence enhancement?

I'm not really into the whole computer/AI aspect. In fact, I'm not convinced that it's the best first step. Most of my focus is in biology, and since it's where my interest lies, it's where I will make my contribution. BUT, I can recognize that it's good that intellegent people are working on the AI issue, and computer augmentation. So, thanks for being involved in that area.

Just a heads up to everyone, this month Scientific American has a focus issue dealing with the brain - augmentation, repair, and maintenance. I'll be getting it in a bit, personally. But, that's the type of issue that would be good to read, and then lend out to someone who might be interested! Anything to get that grain of motivation growing!

#5 Bruce Klein

  • Guardian Founder
  • 8,794 posts
  • 242
  • Location:United States

Posted 27 August 2003 - 07:02 PM

Well, your feelings towards the pursuit from a biological side are commendable and will help. Yet, in terms of leverage and ultimate outcome, AI is where our future ultimately reside because it's just to dangerous to walk around for thousands of years with a biobag and carbon as a substrate.

(My views are not the views held by the majority of ImmInst members and do not reflect any official position of ImmInst)

#6 kevin

  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 27 August 2003 - 07:09 PM

QJones..

I think the two go together.. at least I've been taking both nootropic and life-extension oriented supplements that have made a difference in how I feel and think. I'm going to be posting my regimen here and on my website, although you can get a good overview of a complete one at Paul Wakfer's website, http://www.morelife....is-regimen.html.

I don't think he's heavy on the nootropic side of supplementation, but LifeMirage here is a great source of info for that area.

Fasting is also able to kick the body and mind up a notch or two. Something I doubt I will have the ability to do as I'm addicted to food for the moment.

Look forward to the Scientific American article.. thanks for the notice.

#7 John Doe

  • Guest
  • 291 posts
  • 0

Posted 28 August 2003 - 02:36 AM

Focusing on obtaining or developing neurotechnology in the near future would be a powerful way to enhance intelligence, a far wiser path than anything you could do now, except for the fact that neurotechnology is going to lag behind AI research by a few years.


How is this a fact?

#8 MichaelAnissimov

  • Guest
  • 905 posts
  • 1
  • Location:San Francisco, CA

Posted 29 August 2003 - 02:34 AM

John, that's a question with a complicated answer, one I'd like to do more writing on. For now, all I can offer are the two following pages:

http://www.optimal.o...ntelligence.htm
http://www.singinst....ntro/whyAI.html

#9 bacopa

  • Validating/Suspended
  • 2,223 posts
  • 159
  • Location:Boston

Posted 24 October 2003 - 03:00 AM

I agree with Michael I think reading intelligent things is far superior to reading crap like newspapers which literally has no real intelligence to it just reptitive formats of writng about mostly stupid things people do and dry facts that offer no real substance to them. I was thinking recently what about helping other animals reach their peak intellgence? Wouldn't it be cool to have a bird with human like thought processes? Or how about an elephant with the shear size of its brain it would be amazing how intellgent it could become with the right wiring he he! But I just had to put that out there... anyway I find as of recently, that reading alot and even though I'm on SSRI's for my OCD which fogs my memory and some other cognitive processes I still am amazed at how much smarter I'm getting. Michael that's a good idea about setting one's standards high and trying to meet that wow what a novel idea.

#10 JonesGuy

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,183 posts
  • 8

Posted 24 October 2003 - 12:39 PM

Dude, have you learned nothing from Deep Blue Sea or the Planet of the Apes? [lol]

#11 bacopa

  • Validating/Suspended
  • 2,223 posts
  • 159
  • Location:Boston

Posted 24 October 2003 - 02:30 PM

You sir make me laugh

#12 JonesGuy

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,183 posts
  • 8

Posted 26 October 2003 - 12:53 AM

http://www.cnsfounda...sletter_08.html

excerpt:

Chewing gum improves memory
By Emma Young, Blackpool


Chewing gum can improve memory, say UK psychologists. They found that people who chewed throughout tests of both long-term and short-term memory produced significantly better scores than people who did not. But gum-chewing did not boost memory-linked reaction times, used as a measure of attention.


I cannot find a research article confirming this, but numerous websites have indicated that the BBC ran the story.

Right now, it's an urban myth (for me), until I can find more sources

#13 nefastor

  • Guest
  • 304 posts
  • 0
  • Location:France

Posted 30 October 2003 - 04:54 AM

I've signed today and can't stop posting... I think I found THE most interesting forum and people I can relate to, here.

First off, I'd like to say I agree wholeheartedly with MichaelAnissimov : if you want to be more intelligent, the simplest way is to get more education, that's just plain obvious... except today people want it all without making any effort. I never did drugs (and most probably never will) but I do like wine (since I'm french and born in Bordeaux) and I know all too well the effects of alcool on intelligence. Still, to me, being lovestruck remains the worst possible experience. I remember once wasting an entire week (maybe more) agonising on a girl. She was fine, but we had nothing more than a series of one-nighters anyway. After she left for the Ivory Coast, I came to realize once more how being in love had temporarilly changed my IQ from a real number to a complex one... with only a imaginary part (it was probably -300.i )

But come one ! What's the point of being immortal if you can't have some entertainment ? I know I'm boring to most people, and I also know I wouldn't want to be boring for the next million years. Plus, that would entail not getting laid for a million year. Damn !

About fasting : I'm doing it, sort of, but not on purpose. Because I like my work too much, I skip lunch almost every day (exception : the days I go fencing). Fencing + one meal a day means I weigh 60 kg for 1m75... and it's all muscle. I haven't been to the doctor in years except for yearly mandatory check-ups (an obligation for workers in France).

I didn't notice my mind getting any faster by not eating, but I certainly noticed how "slow" (mentally) I was after a plentyful meal. Everybody feels that, a sleepy-headed daze when you can't concentrate on your work, and which takes hours to subside.

Fasting is actually considered by scientists as potentially extending life. It would seem some of the animals with the longest life spans (like turtles) don't eat that much. They also don't have much sex, but I hope this isn't related !

On a side note : I am among those people who almost never dream. I have about 2 or 3 dreams a year. When I sleep, nothing goes through my "mind". I still don't know how that ties in with intelligence, but I do know it could be genetic : all the males in my family don't dream either.

About animals reaching human-like intelligence : Dfowler, don't you think there's already enough madness on Earth with mankind ? Why would you want to add animals ? They'd be waging war on us before you can spell "zoo" ! Ok... maybe I'm stretching it... and maybe not. But I'll bump QJones' reply : the sharks in Deep Blue Sea would make you think twice before attempting to make animals smarter.

Imagine this : Legions of killer hamsters ! Commando lab-mice planning the escape of their kin from the dreadful extermination camps known as "cosmetics labs" ! Fish avoiding the nets and planting mines under the fishmen boats ! Horses realizing we've been exploiting them for the last 2000 years or so ! Cattle stampeding over the cow-boys and demanding that the UN hand over all butchers ! Highly-deadly venomous amazonian frogs conducting stealth assassinations worldwide ! Swimming on the beaches considered violation of territory by the fish !

What if the animals demanded compensation for us destroying their natural habitat ? We'd be doomed to recession !!!

OK, I'll stop there :)

Back to enhancing human intelligence : I used to think you could "overclock" the brain or increase its size, but since I've learned AI and done research in that field I know there isn't much room for improvement, especially if you intend to keep a (mostly) biological brain. First of all, neurons have no "clock", they are asynchronous devices. Second, if you increase the number of neurons, access time suffers. You'd gain larger memory, but you'd be slower to react.

Slower reaction would be very perceptible when you think, more than when you react, because thinking is a recursive "brain-task" involving a series of accesses.

For all my work (most of it has to do with designing artificial neuron models and implementing them) I don't know how you could REALLY increase the brain's speed and capacity. I think it may be better to look at other ways of getting more intelligent.

For instance, MichaelAnissimov has suggested using google as often as possible (guess how I found about you guys ?). What if you could have a link between your brain and a massive, non-neural database with advanced search engine technology ?

Everytime you come across something unexpected, you could learn about it. It would be great, and something I definitely want someday soon.

The brain has limited capacity. When I don't write C for a month, I loose my edge. I spend a lot of time "readapting" to stuff I alreay know everythime I start a new project. I've "re-learned" some stuff over 10 times already, and every time it "pushed away" some other knowledge. It's just like the caches in a PC : speed up the access to what you need at a given moment.

So maybe improving the brains also means improving how long it takes to get reacquainted with knowledge you already knew.

After all, if you consider we are computer-like being, then you must take into consideration all three essential elements that allow computing and have the most direct impact on performance :
- Memory size
- Data transfer capacity
- Processing speed

One of my plans, if I ever manage to turn my brain into a collection of artificial neurons, is to get the neuroglia out of the way, compact the brain to make it more shock-resistant and fill the skull space I gained with all sorts of mass-storage devices and "helper" processors. OK, and some big-ass EMI shielding all over the skull so your damned cell-phone won't cause a hard-reset !

Jean

#14 David

  • Guest
  • 618 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 09 November 2003 - 04:34 AM

It's kind of a difficult one to answer, as there are a lot of different ideas as to what Intelligence is. One of the major intelligence tests is the WAIS-3 (Plenty of info on the net on this one if you want to know more), and it looks at the following.
1) Verbal IQ 2) Peformance IQ 3) Verbal comprehension 4) Perceptual organization 5) Working memory 6) Processing speed. You get tested on all these, and your score on each is added into a overall score, which is you overall IQ.

However, others believe that we have multiple intelligences, Howard Gardner wrote a doosie of a book on that one, but in a nutshell he believes (as do many others) that we have differing intelligences, such as musical, social, relationship, sports, literary, you know, allsortsastuff!

Looking back at the WAIS-3, there are methods for increasing your IQ in most of these things, like memory. A huge section of IQ testing is dedicated to memory. I use a technique called Mind Mapping to study for exams. A good book for this is "Mind Mapping & Memory by Ingemar Svantesson" (1989). Immediate memory requires other techniques. Plenty of books in your local library for this if you don't want to buy them.

Just about the best thing you can do to increase your IQ is get educated. Your brain is a muscle and the more you excercise it, the stronger it is. For example, CAT scans of musicians brains show up to a third more neuronal activity when listening to music than non musicians. Another example is the fact that there is a correlation between education levels and NOT getting degenerative brain disorders in your older age. Studies on mice have shown that while learning activities don't actually grow more brain cells, they do increase the dendritic connections between them. So, learn stuff, get smarter! You can do this while you wait for the AI uplink....

Being open minded helps too!

Dave

Ps: Yep, drugs and alcohol do damage the 'ole cells, and it doesn't take much, and the bit it damages first is the memory.

#15 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,058 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 09 November 2003 - 04:46 PM

Anyway, one thing I'm doing is slowly teaching myself to write with my off-hand. I've read, but only in mainstream news-sources, that learning new motor skills promotes new neural connections.


Along with writing with your other hand, doing other activities in an alternate way helps, any way that is what I have read in the past. Things like: brush your teeth with the opposite hand, put your less favored arm into your shirt first, change your daily routine slightly, ....etc.

Like I said, I have heard this keeps a person sharp. I have tried it and it seems to work ok.

#16 lynx

  • Guest
  • 643 posts
  • 5

Posted 10 November 2003 - 02:21 AM

Check out http://www.winwenger.com.

He has a technique that can boost IQ by .8/hr call Image Streaming.

I have done it and the effects can be felt instantaneously.

It is really quite remarkable and the theory is sound based on my understanding of neuroscience.

I have taken many nootropics and I have an EEG machine, light sound machine and CES machine. Without a doubt Image Streaming is the most powerful thing I have done.

Gene

#17 jurojin

  • Guest
  • 5 posts
  • 0

Posted 02 December 2003 - 06:35 PM

Pharmaceuticals.

Scientific American had a nice issue earlier this year that focused on the brain and scientific progress in curing brain disorders. One of the articles talked about using medicine not to fix existing problems but to enhance a normal persons capabilities. Some of the medicine for alzheimers patients could concievably increase the memory of a normal person. Also some of the medication like ritalin or metadate for people with ADD can also cause a normal person to be more active yet not suffer side effects that large amounts of caffeine can cause.

#18 wildzbill

  • Guest
  • 15 posts
  • 0

Posted 17 December 2003 - 04:34 PM

One of the most interesting details that I have found in my research in this area is the importance of adrenalin.
If you have ever been involved in a near death violent event (like a car crash), those memories are burned into your mind with such precision that you can recall them in great detail for years. The explanation for this is that the adrenalin causes a shortcut in the normal memory process, and burns them into the 'immediate access' memory (I think that it was the hypothalmus area).

It is important to remember that the brain is wetware, and is not like a computer. Memories are encoded in connection with the chemical environment, and body sensations present at the time. If you study while drinking wine, those memories are easier to access at that same level of blood alcohol.

The term 'gut feeling', actually has validity. It appears that the feeling from your internal organs is remembered as a side track to all memories. Your brain can use this as a filing system, to recall memories that give you a similar emotional reaction.

I have used all of this knowledge to aid the learning process in the past, but I find that I now remember some trivial facts as if they were the most important events in my life. ;)

I have created a false emotional state (fear, love, anger, smugness, etc.) while studying, and then during testing, recreated that state to recall the information. It works very well, actually too well, as you tack trivial data into important areas of your mind.


For further self research into these areas, I have created these states and tried to remember every event in my life that was tied to these emotional feelings. I have found that these memories are incredibly detailed and rich, almost at a lucid dream level, some reaching back to my very early childhood.



In normal Super Memory systems, they almost always tell you to tie facts to outrageously exagerated images, and then chain the facts together by creating another image with two of the exagerated images interacting in some exagerated way. For some people, this works quite well. For me it had limited use.


I have also found that everyone's memory works slightly differently. My wife remembers things with graphic imagery. I remember things by relationship and abstract formulas. Some people relate everything to sound and music. You have to explore your own mind.

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#19 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,058 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 18 February 2004 - 11:40 PM

For a bigger brain, juggle

January 21, 2004 - 4:33PM

Juggling and probably other visual skills that take time to master increase the size of your brain.

That's the conclusion of German researchers, which throws down the gauntlet to the mainstream view that the size of the adult brain does not change at all except when it is confronted by ageing or disease.

University of Regensburg neurologist Arne May and colleagues asked 12 people in their early 20s, most of them women, to learn a classic three-ball juggling trick over three months until they could sustain a performance for at least a minute.

Another 12 were a "control" group who did not juggle.

All the volunteers were given a brain scan with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the start of the program, and a second after three months.

After this, the juggling group were told not to practice their skills at all for three months, and then a third scan was taken of all 24 volunteers.

The scans found that learning to juggle increased by about three per cent the volume of "grey matter" in the mid-temporal area and left posterior intra-parietal sulcus, which are parts of the left hemisphere of the brain that process data from visual motion.

Students who had not undergone juggling training showed no such change.

After the third scan, by which time many recruits had forgotten how to juggle, the increases in grey matter had partly subsided.

That proves in the researchers' view that the anatomical change had been only temporary.

"Our results contradict the traditionally held view that the anatomical structure of the adult human brain does not alter, except for changes in morphology caused by ageing or pathological conditions," their study says.

Quite why the brain's size should grow and contract in response to the demand for learning is unclear.

The change could be caused by an increase in production of neurons (brain cells) to cope with the data-processing burden, or, alternatively, to changes in the connections between the cells, the authors speculated.

Their study is published tomorrow in Nature, the British weekly science journal.

- AFP


This story was found at: http://www.theage.co...4360823154.html




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users