• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


- - - - -

Physicists in japan plan to create new universe


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 19 June 2007 - 07:27 PM


"PHYSICISTS IN JAPAN PLAN TO CREATE NEW UNIVERSE IN LAB
USING THE HIGGS FIELD, SCIENTISTS THEORIZE IT IS POSSIBLE TO CAUSE A 'BABY UNIVERSE' TO BREAK OFF FROM OUR OWN, SAFELY "

http://www.casavaria...ew-universe.htm

#2

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 19 June 2007 - 07:32 PM

http://www.newscient...125591.500.html

#3 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 19 June 2007 - 07:38 PM

Maybe our universe started as a science experiment in another universe.

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 19 June 2007 - 07:43 PM

I actually thought about that.. but it put me in a paradox of "then how did the first universe got created?" as one must have been before life created others..

I wonder if it can help us dodge any universe death that might be happening.
And if we can control its rules.

#5 Cyberbrain

  • Guest, F@H
  • 1,755 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Thessaloniki, Greece

Posted 19 June 2007 - 09:11 PM

Wow, this is really cool and is one more step towards understanding our own universe.

#6 advancedatheist

  • Guest
  • 1,419 posts
  • 11
  • Location:Mayer, Arizona

Posted 20 June 2007 - 01:12 AM

Of course scientists can create new universes. What do you think a universe is -- some kind of miracle?

#7

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 20 June 2007 - 08:13 AM

What I really wonder is..
They say it'll seperate from our spacetime to its own, will it grow to same size as ours?
And howcome it will, afterall, by the big bang theory there was alot of matter/energy at that one spot to create our universe in the start. that dosen't seem to be the case here.

#8

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 20 June 2007 - 12:06 PM

"Some have worried that such an experiment that would create black holes could destroy the entire planet, but Dr Cox dismissed the worries. "The probability is at the level of 10 to the minus 40," he said. That is a 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 chance."

Neat! sorta..

#9

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 20 June 2007 - 07:52 PM

More about Universe Recipe!

http://www.slate.com/id/2100715

"It doesn't take all that much to create a universe. Resources on a cosmic scale are not required. It might even be possible for someone in a not terribly advanced civilization to cook up a new universe in a laboratory."

Something tells me that by "not terribly advanced civilization" it means us.

#10 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,080 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 20 June 2007 - 11:14 PM

I actually thought about that.. but it put me in a paradox of "then how did the first universe got created?" as one must have been before life created others.


I resolve the paradox by theorizing (ala Fred Hoyle), that everything has always been here. There was no beginning and there will be no end. Things change, new universes come and go, but everything was always here. Of course, this type of theory also makes the Fermi paradox even more amazing.

#11 mike250

  • Guest
  • 981 posts
  • 9

Posted 21 June 2007 - 08:12 AM

if things come and go then they must have beginnings and endings or at least boundaries which dictate where and how they exist and when they will ultimately be proceeded by others.

#12 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 21 June 2007 - 04:01 PM

if things come and go then they must have beginnings and endings or at least boundaries which dictate where and how they exist and when they will ultimately be proceeded by others.

Why must they?

#13 mike250

  • Guest
  • 981 posts
  • 9

Posted 21 June 2007 - 04:09 PM

because I believe its those beginnings and endings that signify the existence of that some-thing. if scientists can create a small-scale ''prototype'' of the universe then I don't see why we can't use those era-marking terms. the fact that we have created it signifies that it has begun.

Edited by mike250, 21 June 2007 - 04:29 PM.


#14 Harvey Newstrom

  • Guest, Advisor
  • 102 posts
  • 1
  • Location:Washington, DC & FL

Posted 21 June 2007 - 04:21 PM

"Some have worried that such an experiment that would create black holes could destroy the entire planet, but Dr Cox dismissed the worries. "The probability is at the level of 10 to the minus 40," he said. That is a 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 chance."


"Only..." This is why I wish we had space travel. Something like this could be done on a separate little asteroid first before it is done on earth. In fact, a lot of physics experiments could be done on an experimental asteroid "just in case". The buffer of outer space between the earth and these experiments would increase safety and would minimize such worries.

#15 mike250

  • Guest
  • 981 posts
  • 9

Posted 21 June 2007 - 04:34 PM

they say objects absorbed by black holes come out of white holes. maybe our planet will be transported to another galaxy.

#16

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 21 June 2007 - 05:30 PM

they say objects absorbed by black holes come out of white holes. maybe our planet will be transported to another galaxy.


Where did you hear that one?

#17 JohnDoe1234

  • Guest
  • 1,097 posts
  • 154
  • Location:US

Posted 21 June 2007 - 09:40 PM

"Some have worried that such an experiment that would create black holes could destroy the entire planet, but Dr Cox dismissed the worries. "The probability is at the level of 10 to the minus 40," he said. That is a 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 chance."


I want to know where they pull these numbers from.

#18 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 21 June 2007 - 09:56 PM

I want to know where they pull these numbers from.

Maybe they pull them out of black holes. [:o]

#19 JohnDoe1234

  • Guest
  • 1,097 posts
  • 154
  • Location:US

Posted 21 June 2007 - 11:27 PM

or the Brown Eye

#20 JonesGuy

  • Guest
  • 1,183 posts
  • 8

Posted 21 June 2007 - 11:30 PM

I figure this is how we'll avoid heat death. We'll just download are personal consciousnesses into a baby universe when the time is right. It might be a bit sad, because it'll be the last time we get to talk to each other :(

#21

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 22 June 2007 - 12:25 AM

I figure this is how we'll avoid heat death.  We'll just download are personal consciousnesses into a baby universe when the time is right.  It might be a bit sad, because it'll be the last time we get to talk to each other :(


Kinda lost you here.

But if we manage to use Zero Point Energy we should be ok.

#22 JonesGuy

  • Guest
  • 1,183 posts
  • 8

Posted 22 June 2007 - 07:25 PM

We'll have to worry about Heat Death someday (probably). I know that now is not the time to worry about it, so I don't really do so. That said, I have a tentative solution.

While creating a baby universe (which should have an infinite amount of mass and energy, within its own respect, much like our visible universe), we will do so in such a way to transport our personal consciousness - in other words, make sure that an analogue of our neural structure is created in the new universe while it is being born. Such a process would probably cease our consciousness here, so it carries a theme similar to teleportation. Regardless, at that point, you'd be in the baby universe instead of here. It's a way of being immortal, but you lose all your friends.

But don't worry if I'm totally out to lunch in my thoughts: I'm not much of a physicist, and (like I said) this problem is not really a pressing concern at the moment.

#23

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 22 June 2007 - 07:37 PM

Well as far as I understand it, as long as the universe is expanding we won't have heat death.

But it's causing the "Runaway Universe" which says nothing will be in it due to "suggested decay"..

I really would like a physicist to explain some things to us so it'll be easier to sleep over nights :)

#24

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 22 June 2007 - 07:40 PM

We need to recruit Hawking to our sides :)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users