• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

FDA to Release Final Regulation Today


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Anthony_Loera

  • Life Member
  • 3,168 posts
  • 745
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 22 June 2007 - 06:29 PM


From an email I got today from the NPA:

"The Natural Products Association has learned that the final regulation establishing good manufacturing practices (GMPs) for dietary supplements will be released by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today as early as 11:30 a.m. Although the regulation, which is reportedly approximately 800 pages, will take several days to be published in the Federal Register, it will be available on the FDA Web site at [url="http://www.fda.gov/.""]http://www.fda.gov/."[/url]

I will read it, and post relevant items.

It will be interesting how they regarding "Investigational New Drugs" (IND) (if... they included it at all in these regulations), as that was one of the questions that came before the FDA regarding the lack of information about them within the new regulations.


Anthony Loera

#2 Anthony_Loera

  • Topic Starter
  • Life Member
  • 3,168 posts
  • 745
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 22 June 2007 - 06:30 PM

Here is the official press release from the FDA site:
=================================

FDA Issues Dietary Supplements Final Rule

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today announced a final rule establishing regulations to require current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) for dietary supplements. The rule ensures that dietary supplements are produced in a quality manner, do not contain contaminants or impurities, and are accurately labeled.

"This rule helps to ensure the quality of dietary supplements so that consumers can be confident that the products they purchase contain what is on the label," said Commissioner of Food and Drugs Andrew C. von Eschenbach, M.D. "In addition, as a result of recent amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, by the end of the year, industry will be required to report all serious dietary supplement related adverse events to FDA."

The regulations establish the cGMP needed to ensure quality throughout the manufacturing, packaging, labeling, and storing of dietary supplements. The final rule includes requirements for establishing quality control procedures, designing and constructing manufacturing plants, and testing ingredients and the finished product. It also includes requirements for recordkeeping and handling consumer product complaints.

"The final rule will help ensure that dietary supplements are manufactured with controls that result in a consistent product free of contamination, with accurate labeling," said Robert E. Brackett, Ph.D., director of FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

Under the final rule, manufacturers are required to evaluate the identity, purity, strength, and composition of their dietary supplements. If dietary supplements contain contaminants or do not contain the dietary ingredient they are represented to contain, FDA would consider those products to be adulterated or misbranded.

The aim of the final rule is to prevent inclusion of the wrong ingredients, too much or too little of a dietary ingredient, contamination by substances such as natural toxins, bacteria, pesticides, glass, lead and other heavy metals, as well as improper packaging and labeling.

The final rule includes flexible requirements that can evolve with improvements in scientific methods used for verifying identity, purity strength, and composition of dietary supplements.

As a companion document, FDA also is issuing an interim final rule that outlines a petition process for manufacturers to request an exemption to the cGMP requirement for 100 percent identity testing of specific dietary ingredients used in the processing of dietary supplements.

Under the interim final rule the manufacturer may be exempted from the dietary ingredient identity testing requirement if it can provide sufficient documentation that the reduced frequency of testing requested would still ensure the identity of the dietary ingredient. FDA is soliciting comment from the public on the interim final rule. There will be a 90-day comment period, ending on September 24, 2007. Comments may be addressed to the Division of Dockets Management Branch at www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.

The final CGMP and the interim final rule are effective August 24, 2007. To limit any disruption for dietary supplements produced by small businesses, the rule has a three-year phase-in for small businesses. Companies with more than 500 employees have until June 2008 to comply, companies with less than 500 employees have until June 2009 to comply, and companies with fewer than 20 employees have until June 2010 to comply with the regulations.

Backgrounder: http://www.cfsan.fda...s/dscgmps7.html

Fact Sheet: http://www.cfsan.fda...s/dscgmps6.html

To see a consumer article called "Final Rule Promotes Safe Use of Dietary Supplements," visit http://www.fda.gov/c...upps062207.html.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 Anthony_Loera

  • Topic Starter
  • Life Member
  • 3,168 posts
  • 745
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 22 June 2007 - 06:38 PM

Ok last but not least...

The final CGMP and the interim final rule are effective August 24, 2007

Here they are... first the 815 page final rule document is available here:

final Rule:
http://www.fda.gov/O...98fr/cf0441.pdf

Interm Rule:
http://www.fda.gov/O...98fr/oc0790.pdf


Just an FYI for those small business folks out there....

Anthony Loera

#4 lucid

  • Guest
  • 1,195 posts
  • 65
  • Location:Austin, Tx

Posted 22 June 2007 - 07:23 PM

So is a fair summary of this:
FDA will now regulate quality of supplements, but it will not require supplements to prove efficacy in treatment or prevention of a disease?

Will this help or hurt small supplement manufacturers?

#5 Anthony_Loera

  • Topic Starter
  • Life Member
  • 3,168 posts
  • 745
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 22 June 2007 - 07:28 PM

I think your summary is appropriate so far...

I haven't yet read any earth shattering new inclusion that we haven't been following, and there doesn't seem to be any real mention of IND information.

I am only on page 40, but will continue to see if I find any interesting surprises for manufacturers.

I suppose it really affects those people who haven't been following GMP practices more than anyone else.

#6 health_nutty

  • Guest
  • 2,410 posts
  • 94
  • Location:California

Posted 22 June 2007 - 07:43 PM

It doesn't sound as brutal as I thought it might. It doesn't sound like a bad thing at all, in fact.


I read it thinking: this could be a good thing. Truth in labeling and protection from contaments: Amen.

#7 bixbyte

  • Guest
  • 559 posts
  • 45
  • Location:End of the Galaxy
  • NO

Posted 22 June 2007 - 09:45 PM

This means that little companies can sell supplements for less money without any expensive testing but big supp manufacturers must comply right away.
Little does not have to comply for 3 years.
Negative for bigger pharmas in the supp biz.
Sirtris dropped a lot on this news.

Alex

#8 luv2increase

  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 22 June 2007 - 10:54 PM

This will hurt the smaller businesses. This is actually a good thing. I've been taking supps from BN for a few months now weary of their constituents.

This is probably the only time that I will ever say this because I'm sure there will be more 'negative' to come from the FDA, but job well done. I don't mind having a peace of mind about the substances that I take in my body. Granted, the price of supplements will rise because of this but in all good intended.

#9 shifter

  • Guest
  • 716 posts
  • 5

Posted 24 June 2007 - 05:56 AM

Are there any manufacturers who already follow these GMP's? Like NOW, LEF, Jarrow, RI etc

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#10 Matt

  • Guest
  • 2,862 posts
  • 149
  • Location:United Kingdom
  • NO

Posted 24 June 2007 - 10:34 AM

A good thing, but I already trust my supplier of supps(AOR).




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users