Not to unnecessarily keep this thread going...
But I agree that cryonics may indeed be a useless endeavor. Essentially, if a future civilization is technologically advanced enough to revive you and cure you of whatever you were dying(and whatever you weren't dying but would have died), why couldn't a future civilization just as well revive a buried body or less preserved body.
A buried body will break down and not be revivable in a short amount of time. What do you mean by a "less preserved body"? Cryonics preserves the body pretty well; I don't know how you would preserve a body "less" and still have it viable.
Hell, a virtual simulation of all matter, run backwards using the grand unified theory of physics for all subatomic particles n stuff, would be able to determine 'you' and revive you.
Well, I suppose if you could have a society advanced enough to do that, then maaaaaybe it might be possible. However, running such an advanced simulation of all matter would 1) be far, far more advanced than what would be required to revive a cryonically suspended individual, 2) would still be a simulation, and therefore a "copy" of "you" and not the real you (a big problem for those of us worried about continuity, for the same reason I see a copy of myself as someone different), and 3) is far, far more speculative as to if it would even be possible than cryonics is.
I guess an argument can be made for being revived earlier rather than later, but what I'm wondering is if just indicating in your will that you'd like to be revived if technologically possible cryonics enough?
I am not understanding what you are asking here. Your question does not make grammatical sense.