Anyone else think this sounds extremely logical? (not perfect, but at least more logical than the current US system)
http://video.google....323583494421392
Edited by Live Forever, 06 December 2007 - 07:27 AM.
Posted 26 August 2007 - 06:05 AM
Edited by Live Forever, 06 December 2007 - 07:27 AM.
Posted 26 August 2007 - 06:06 AM
Posted 26 August 2007 - 01:08 PM
Posted 26 August 2007 - 09:15 PM
Posted 26 August 2007 - 09:29 PM
Posted 26 August 2007 - 09:55 PM
Posted 27 August 2007 - 06:39 AM
This study compares mean 2003 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading and mathematics scores of public and private schools in 4th and 8th grades, statistically controlling for individual student characteristics (such as gender, race/ethnicity, disability status, identification as an English language learner) and school characteristics (such as school size, location, and the composition of the student body). In grades 4 and 8, using unadjusted mean scores, students in private schools scored significantly higher than students in public schools for both reading and mathematics. But when school means were adjusted in the HLM analysis, the average for public schools was significantly higher than the average for private schools for grade 4 mathematics and not significantly different for reading. At grade 8, the average for private schools was significantly higher than the average for public schools in reading but not significantly different for mathematics. Comparisons were also carried out between types of sectarian schools. In grade 4, Catholic and Lutheran schools were compared separately to public schools. For both reading and mathematics, the results were similar to those based on all private schools. In grade 8, Catholic, Lutheran, and Conservative Christian schools were each compared to public schools. For Catholic and Lutheran schools for both reading and mathematics, the results were again similar to those based on all private schools. For Conservative Christian schools, the average adjusted school mean in reading was not significantly different from that of public schools. In mathematics, the average adjusted school mean for Conservative Christian schools was significantly lower than that of public schools.
Posted 27 August 2007 - 08:05 PM
Well, the current system in the U.S. is poor. Some changes are necessary. Something more open-source and freedom-based would seem to be a good move.
Posted 30 August 2007 - 12:09 AM
Posted 30 August 2007 - 01:03 AM
Oh good. Even being a libertarian, I realize that there are a lot of problems with the health care system in the US, but I don't like Moore's suggestion of more socialization.Fabulous. Stossel is the man for this kind of job, I always enjoy these specials. You don't see this on the airwaves anywhere else. He's currently working on a special about health care featuring an interview with Michael Moore, look forward to it.
Posted 01 September 2007 - 01:44 AM
Quite a bit more of an education is needed than what is generally taught in public and private schools.... the fact that no delinquency, sexual aberrations or child neglect are to be found within its domain, that the incidence of emotional disturbances is low, that the physical, intellectual and ethical standards of the pupils are commendable, is a source of encouragement and evidence of substantial achievement. It is also our warrant for attempting to present communal education to a wider public.
If people would live healthy lifestyles, they wouldn't need health care from an abusive health care system. Living a healthy lifestyle is the only practical solution in my opinion.problems with the health care system in the US
Posted 04 September 2007 - 04:43 PM
I completely disagree with this. You are making broad generalizations. Free markets almost always get the job done better, and capitalism is the best way to achieve what the people want. (by definition in fact) I would almost defy you to point to a situation where a free market (unhindered by governmental interference) has worked out badly.Trying to reform the school system is like trying to reform capitalism: it can't be done satisfactorily for all. Only the few benefit from the reforms whereas the majority continue to suffer. Even when the suffering of the majority is alleviated, it's never enough to do the job fully.
1) I seriously doubt that a communal system works out better than any other on a small scale like that, but even given that they would, 2) I know for a fact that communist education systems work out poorly on a large scale as has been evidenced by comparing every instance of it ever undertaken, lol.Put me down as being in favor of a communal education for children. On page 126 of the book Kibbutz Goshen: An Israeli Commune it says:
I am not going to say poor health has no effect, but unless you are suggesting forcing people to become healthy (at which point I don't think you would have anyone supporting your system) then talking about the education system is a separate argument. I do think that the food they serve in schools is pretty bad overall, but yet again, if there was a free market system (as described in the video) there would be an incentive for parents to go to schools with better lunch programs (if it was something that they found important).I would like to know how much bad diet and obesity, excessive amounts of negative television programming, and bad parenting goes into the poor performance of children in the schools. There's a limit to what good teachers and good school programs can accomplish.
If people would live healthy lifestyles, they wouldn't need health care from an abusive health care system. Living a healthy lifestyle is the only practical solution in my opinion.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users