• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

Water heater violates known physics?


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 20 September 2007 - 02:43 PM


How this 12inch miracle tube could halve heating bills
Amazing British invention creates MORE energy than you put into it - and could soon be warming your home


Last updated at 21:09pm on 15th September 2007

It sounds too good to be true - not to mention the fact that it violates almost every known law of physics.

But British scientists claim they have invented a revolutionary device that seems to 'create' energy from virtually nothing.

Their so-called thermal energy cell could soon be fitted into ordinary homes, halving domestic heating bills and making a major contribution towards cutting carbon emissions.

Even the makers of the device are at a loss to explain exactly how it works - but sceptical independent scientists carried out their own tests and discovered that the 12in x 2in tube really does produce far more heat energy than the electrical energy put in.

The device seems to break the fundamental physical law that energy cannot be created from nothing - but researchers believe it taps into a previously unrecognised source of energy, stored at a sub-atomic level within the hydrogen atoms in water.

The system - developed by scientists at a firm called Ecowatts in a nondescript laboratory on an industrial estate at Lancing, West Sussex - involves passing an electrical current through a mixture of water, potassium carbonate (otherwise known as potash) and a secret liquid catalyst, based on chrome.

This creates a reaction that releases an incredible amount of energy compared to that put in. If the reaction takes place in a unit surrounded by water, the liquid heats up, which could form the basis for a household heating system.

If the technology can be developed on a domestic scale, it means consumers will need much less energy for heating and hot water - creating smaller bills and fewer greenhouse gases.

Jim Lyons, of the University of York, independently evaluated the system. He said: 'Let's be honest, people are generally pretty sceptical about this kind of thing. Our team was happy to take on the evaluation, even if to prove it didn't work.

'But this is a very efficient replacement for the traditional immersion heater. We have examined this interesting technology and when we got the rig operating, we were getting 150 to 200 per cent more energy out than we put in, without trying too hard.

http://www.dailymail...in_page_id=1965

#2 Luna

  • Guest, F@H
  • 2,528 posts
  • 66
  • Location:Israel

Posted 20 September 2007 - 03:09 PM

Free Energy Device number.. sorry I stopped counting.

Not interesting untill there is a true validation we can see.

#3 Johan

  • Guest, F@H
  • 472 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 20 September 2007 - 04:22 PM

I agree with winterbreeze. There have been far too many of these things to make this one more believeable than the others. I'm sure quite a few of us still have the most recent "free energy device" created by Steorn fresh in mind...

Anyway, here's the picture from the article explaining how this one works:

Posted Image

Notice the "secret catalyst".

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 biknut

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 20 September 2007 - 05:12 PM

This is how we'll know if it's a fake, someone will test, and expose it as such.

This is how we'll know if it's real, we'll never hear another thing about it ever again.

#5 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 20 September 2007 - 05:23 PM

This is how we'll know if it's a fake, someone will test, and expose it as such.

This is how we'll know if it's real, we'll never hear another thing about it ever again.

We will know it is real if it is front page news on every paper after being verified. Alas, that ain't gonna happen, as with 100% of the millions of these sorts of claims that have come before.

#6 Brainbox

  • Member
  • 2,860 posts
  • 743
  • Location:Netherlands
  • NO

Posted 20 September 2007 - 06:25 PM

Secret catalyst

Are magnets involved in any way perhaps? [wis]

#7 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 20 September 2007 - 06:39 PM

Secret catalyst

Are magnets involved in any way perhaps? [wis]

I am thinking magnetic Chiu rings.

#8 spins

  • Guest
  • 177 posts
  • 1
  • Location:UK

Posted 25 September 2007 - 01:19 PM

Hmmm ... electrical current passes between an anode and cathode you say? Potassium Carbonate is an electrolyte (often used in cold fusion experiments) and a secret catalyst you say? Sounds like a glorified fuel cell to me so the extra energy will be coming from a chemical reaction between the secret catalyst and the water (presumably), at some point the reactant will need replacing, no free energy thus no laws broken I'm afraid. [tung]

#9 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 1,999
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 26 September 2007 - 03:36 AM

This sounds like a hydrino device. A few years ago there was a lot of press about a company in New Jersey ( http://www.blackligh...m/profile.shtml ) that claims to have discovered a new electronic state of hydrogen, WAY below the traditional 1s ground state. It can only be attained through some sort of resonance transfer with another species that has a very similarly spaced transition. 13.2 eV comes to mind, but don't quote me on it. Anyway, one such species was potassium ions, derived from the carbonate. This would occur in a plasma, not in solution. I looked over some of their reported spectroscopic evidence, and if it was fake, they at least faked the right things and did it well. Physicists from several labs with decent reputations have checked it out and come away impressed. Someone has invested a bunch of money. ($50M) I think it was Westinghouse. There are also publications in real journals. The company seems to be bent on proving the science, and you can bet that when someone claims there is an undiscovered groundstate below 1s, they are going to get a lot of flack from the physics community. Things like this are so toxic in the conventional science community that most people won't touch them with a ten foot pole. It's like instant career suicide. I found the story interesting a couple years ago but didn't follow it. I've heard no big news. If it pans out, it will change the world. If not, no one will be surprised. There's a lot of stuff on the website- they're very open about the science.

#10 spins

  • Guest
  • 177 posts
  • 1
  • Location:UK

Posted 26 September 2007 - 02:13 PM

Yeah anything like this tends to get rejected by mainstream science because there have been so many failures. It's also the reason why physicists don't use the term cold fusion anymore when referring to Muon-catalyzed fusion, anything to try and disassociate the science from cold fusion.

#11 biknut

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 26 September 2007 - 02:58 PM

When I first read this article it made me think of cold fusion but they were faking me out because they don't mention it at all.

If this technology ever becomes popular I think everyone will refer to it as cold fusion.

#12 spins

  • Guest
  • 177 posts
  • 1
  • Location:UK

Posted 26 September 2007 - 04:07 PM

Unfortunately I don't think it will because "free energy" violates all the known laws of physics, it seems to be a never-ending human obsession because I don't think a year goes by without someone (mistakenly) claiming they have.

As I hinted at earlier, some form of exothermic reaction must be taking place within the secret catalyst that they aren't accounting for, you don't get anything for free, at some point the reactants will need replacing. Sourcing and processing the compounds in the secret catalyst mixture will probably use up more energy than the heater will ever produce. [lol]

As you say though, we'll see I suppose.

#13

  • Lurker
  • -1

Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:39 PM

http://www.dailymail...in_page_id=1965

Even the makers of the device are at a loss to explain exactly how it works - but sceptical independent scientists carried out their own tests and discovered that the 12in x 2in tube really does produce far more heat energy than the electrical energy put in.



#14 s123

  • Director
  • 1,348 posts
  • 1,056
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:46 PM

http://www.dailymail...in_page_id=1965


I don't believe it. A new kind of energy? The physics would have found this energy a long time ago.

#15 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:48 PM

I see a story like this about 2 or 3 times a year. Nothing ever comes out of them.

#16 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,080 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 29 October 2007 - 09:00 PM

Ditto what liveforever said. The free market would prove far beyond a doubt if it is real. No one is "buying" it.

#17 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 1,999
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 30 October 2007 - 01:21 AM

I went to the Daily Mail site to check it out, but got sidetracked by the article about Nicole Kidman's transparent dress. With Pictures.

We had a thread about this same device not too long ago.

#18 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 30 October 2007 - 02:01 AM

We had a thread about this same device not too long ago.

Matthias just merged them together for us.

#19 Andrew Shevchuk

  • Guest
  • 75 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Tucson, AZ

Posted 30 October 2007 - 09:16 PM

It's disappointing that these kinds of things have developed such a social stigma, because it's clear to me (as an aspiring physicist) that there is a lot about physics we still don't understand. It's not impossible that there is something really going on here, but I won't claim that it's likely. Thermodynamics is a pretty solid subject.

#20

  • Lurker
  • -1

Posted 01 November 2007 - 05:53 AM

Here's another so-called "over-unity" water heater
http://video.google....earch&plindex=1

I have seen a longer film about this one somewhere.

#21 Luna

  • Guest, F@H
  • 2,528 posts
  • 66
  • Location:Israel

Posted 01 November 2007 - 09:51 AM

If those stuff REALLY work, why those guys go to the media and not to the science scoiety?

#22

  • Lurker
  • -1

Posted 01 November 2007 - 04:16 PM

As far as I can tell the scientific method is the art of sharing information in a trustworthy manner. The congnitive dissonance is large and a barrier to see that we have no society now, that we are currently living in a state that virtually equates to "law of the jungle." Perhaps a vast majority has no recourse except to pursue money as a measure of success or wealth when it may necessitate compromising integrity.

Here's some data that states the number of corporations controlling common media has shrunk from 50 in 1983 to 5 today: http://www.corporations.org/media/

Here's a chart of those five corporations and their holdings:
http://www.nowfounda...diacontrol.html

Did you ever see the video "Who Killed the Electric Car?" Amazing to see that GM, Honda and Toyota all removed their products from market after the demand was established and proven.

For explorations into alternatives to monetary profit control of our destinies, see the many entries at http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/

I don't know about over-unity devices and expect there are better explanations than dumping time tested laws of physics but I do see that monetary systems are basically zero-sum games where scarcity is preserved for the sake of concentrating money in the hands of a few.

#23 AdamSummerfield

  • Guest
  • 351 posts
  • 4
  • Location:Derbyshire, England

Posted 03 November 2007 - 07:56 PM

The source of this 'miracle heater' must be compromised somehow. Perhaps the writer is confused.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users