• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

p5p inhibits lipid glycation


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 liorrh

  • Guest, F@H
  • 388 posts
  • -1

Posted 26 December 2007 - 07:06 AM


J Lipid Res. 2006 May;47(5):964-74. Epub 2006 Feb 9. Links
Aminophospholipid glycation and its inhibitor screening system: a new role of pyridoxal 5'-phosphate as the inhibitor.Higuchi O, Nakagawa K, Tsuzuki T, Suzuki T, Oikawa S, Miyazawa T.
Food and Biodynamic Chemistry Laboratory, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Peroxidized phospholipid-mediated cytotoxity is involved in the pathophysiology of a number of diseases [i.e., the abnormal increase of phosphatidylcholine hydroperoxide (PCOOH) found in the plasma of type 2 diabetic patients]. The PCOOH accumulation may relate to Amadori-glycated phosphatidylethanolamine (deoxy-D-fructosyl PE, or Amadori-PE), because Amadori-PE causes oxidative stress. However, lipid glycation inhibitor has not been discovered yet because of the lack of a lipid glycation model useful for inhibitor screening. We optimized and developed a lipid glycation model considering various reaction conditions (glucose concentration, temperature, buffer type, and pH) between PE and glucose. Using the developed model, various protein glycation inhibitors (aminoguanidine, pyridoxamine, and carnosine), antioxidants (ascorbic acid, alpha-tocopherol, quercetin, and rutin), and other food compounds (L-lysine, L-cysteine, pyridoxine, pyridoxal, and pyridoxal 5'-phosphate) were evaluated for their antiglycative properties. Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate and pyridoxal (vitamin B(6) derivatives) were the most effective antiglycative compounds. These pyridoxals could easily be condensed with PE before the glucose/PE reaction occurred. Because PE-pyridoxal 5'-phosphate adduct was detectable in human red blood cells and the increased plasma Amadori-PE concentration in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats was decreased by dietary supplementation of pyridoxal 5'-phosphate, it is likely that pyridoxal 5'-phosphate acts as a lipid glycation inhibitor in vivo, which possibly contributes to diabetes prevention.

PMID: 16470027

#2 liorrh

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 388 posts
  • -1

Posted 28 December 2007 - 07:14 PM

OMG its science

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 Shepard

  • Member, Director, Moderator
  • 6,360 posts
  • 932
  • Location:Auburn, AL

Posted 28 December 2007 - 07:52 PM

Posted Image

OMG it's a cat.

#4 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 28 December 2007 - 10:27 PM

OMG it's a cat.

ROTFLMAO

#5 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,135 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 28 December 2007 - 10:59 PM

While reading up on p5p I stumbled across this patent.

Compounds suitable for use in the methods of the invention include pyridoxal-5'-phosphate, pyridoxamine, pyridoxal, 3-acylated pyridoxal analogues, pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts thereof, and mixtures thereof.

In accordance with the present invention, it has been found that pyridoxal-5'-phosphate and its derivatives can be used concurrently with therapeutic cardiovascular compounds in the treatment of the above-identified diseases and conditions. "Treatment" and "treating" as used herein include preventing, inhibiting, and alleviating cardiovascular diseases, related diseases, and related symptoms as well as healing the ischemia-related conditions or symptoms thereof affecting mammalian organs and tissues. Treatment may be carried out by concurrently administering a therapeutically effective amount of a combination of a compound suitable for use in methods of the invention and a therapeutic cardiovascular compound.


Seems as though the inventors patented some formulations containing p5p. Assignee: Merrill Lynch Capital. Anyone see something like this on the market recently?

#6 liorrh

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 388 posts
  • -1

Posted 29 December 2007 - 08:52 PM

Posted Image

OMG it's a cat.


: Schizophr Res. 2007 Aug;94(1-3):50-7. Epub 2007 May 25. Links
Elevated social Internet use and schizotypal personality disorder in adolescents.Mittal VA, Tessner KD, Walker EF.
Emory University, Psychology, Department of Psychology, 235 Dental Building, 1462 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. vmittal@emory.edu

INTRODUCTION: In the past decade, the use of the Internet as a forum for communication has exponentially increased, and research indicates that excessive use is associated with psychiatric symptoms. The present study examined the rate of Internet use in adolescents with personality disorders, with a focus on schizotypal personality disorder (SPD), which is characterized by marked interpersonal deficits. Because the Internet provides an easily accessible forum for anonymous social interaction and constitutes an environment where communication is less likely to be hampered by interpersonal deficits, it was hypothesized that SPD youth will spend significantly more time engaging in social activities on the Internet than controls. METHODS: Self-reports of daily Internet use in adolescents with SPD (n=19), a control group with other personality disorders (n=22) and a non-psychiatric control group (n=28) were collected. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that the SPD participants reported significantly less social interaction with 'real-life' friends, but used the Internet for social interaction significantly more frequently than controls. Chat room participation, cooperative Internet gaming, and to a lesser degree, e-mail use, were positively correlated with ratings of SPD symptom severity and Beck Depression Inventory scores. DISCUSSION: Findings are discussed in light of the potential benefits and risks associated with Internet use by socially isolated SPD youth.

PMID: 17532188


: Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Feb;9(1):69-81. Links
Internet use by the socially fearful: addiction or therapy?Campbell AJ, Cumming SR, Hughes I.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia. A.Campbell@fhs.usyd.edu.au

The Internet has often been argued to have adverse psychological consequences, such as depression or anxiety symptoms, among "over-users." The present study offers an alternative understanding, suggesting the Internet may be used as a forum for expanding social networks and consequently enhancing the chance of meaningful relationships, self-confidence, social abilities, and social support. An online sample of 188 people was recruited over the Internet, while paper and pencil tests were administered to an offline sample group of 27 undergraduate university students, who were regular Internet users. Subjects completed the Zung Depression Scale (ZDS), Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire?Revised Short Scale (EPQ-R Short), Fear of Negative Evaluation (FNE) scale, Internet Use Questionnaire (IUQ), and an Internet Effects Questionnaire (IEQ). Results suggested that there was no relationship between time spent online and depression, anxiety, or social fearfulness. Those who primarily used the Internet for online chat believed that the Internet is psychologically beneficial to them, but also believed that frequent Internet users are lonely and that the Internet can be addictive. It is argued that "chat" users who are socially fearful may be using the Internet as a form of low-risk social approach and an opportunity to rehearse social behavior and communication skills, which, may help them improve interaction with offline, face-to-face, social environments.

PMID: 16497120


J Li Ex Res. 2006 May;47(5):964-74. Epub 2007 Feb 9. Links
Involvement in internet forums retards individuals
.Higuchi O, Nakagawa K, Tsuzuki T, Suzuki T, Oikawa S, Miyazawa T.
National council on health of fucktards Laboratory, Graduate School of Nonsense Science, Balls University, Springfield, There.

PMID: 16470027

#7 Shepard

  • Member, Director, Moderator
  • 6,360 posts
  • 932
  • Location:Auburn, AL

Posted 29 December 2007 - 09:36 PM

J Li Ex Res. 2006 May;47(5):964-74. Epub 2007 Feb 9. Links
Involvement in internet forums retards individuals
.Higuchi O, Nakagawa K, Tsuzuki T, Suzuki T, Oikawa S, Miyazawa T.
National council on health of fucktards Laboratory, Graduate School of Nonsense Science, Balls University, Springfield, There.

PMID: 16470027


You've at least got to try, man. This just shows a lack of commitment.

On the plus side, I guess this means I can be prescribed some sweet action from Big Pharma.

#8 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 29 December 2007 - 09:58 PM

Oh, goody. A pussy cat thread.

Attached File  MVC_069F.JPG   202.17KB   36 downloads

#9 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,135 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 29 December 2007 - 10:09 PM

Alright, some valauble discussion could come of this topic (p5p prevents lipid glycation), if people can just focus a little and be helpful, otherwise we might as well just delete the thread. Most members would benefit if you "experts" would elaborate more in laymans terms. Why is this important? How will it help maintain a healthy and longer life?

#10 Shepard

  • Member, Director, Moderator
  • 6,360 posts
  • 932
  • Location:Auburn, AL

Posted 29 December 2007 - 11:14 PM

Why is this important? How will it help maintain a healthy and longer life?


Here is a discussion with Wafker and Olafsson from a little while ago that some might enjoy:

http://www.groupsrv....bout140725.html

#11 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,135 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 29 December 2007 - 11:17 PM

Thanks Shep

#12 edward

  • Guest
  • 1,404 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Southeast USA

Posted 30 December 2007 - 05:02 AM

Very interesting, thanks Shepard for the link to the discussion of the topic http://www.groupsrv....bout140725.html

According to Wakfer the ideal form of vitamin B6 to prevent glycation, lipid or otherwise would be Pyridoxamine not P5P/PLP. See quote below:

Quote:

From Paul Wakfer and Olafur:
[Vitamin B6 exists in three natural forms, Pyridoxine, Pyridoxal and
Pyridoxamine, Pyridoxin being the form most commonly found in
supplements. Pyridoxamine has some interesting benefits over the other
two. It is a very potent antiglycative agent much more potent than the
other two forms Pyridoxine being the least potent one (see full text of
PMID: 8602828). In addition it is a good scavenger of toxic carbonyl
products of glucose and lipid degradation and it traps reactive oxygen
species (PMID: 15558839). A good summary of it's benefits written by
Paul and Kitty is found on the MoreLife site:
http://morelife.org/...lements/PM.html I would highly recommend
switching to Pyridoxamine instead of Pyridoxin if you can afford it. I
also recommend that you stop taking the P5P. P5P
(Pyridoxal-5-Phosphate) is one of the two active coenzyme forms
(phosphorylated forms) of vitamin B6 the other one being Pyridoxamine
5-Phosphate. While at first thought one might think P5P is a superior
form of vitamin B6 because it doesn't need to be converted to the
active coenzyme form in the body that is not the whole story. In order
to be absorbed in the body the phosphorylated forms of vitamin B6 first
need to be dephosphorylized (hydrolyzed) which means that P5P gets
hydrolyzed into Pyridoxine in the digestive tract before being
absorbed, so in fact supplemental P5P doesn't have any benefits over
Pyridoxine at least not by an oral route and is definitely not worth
the higher price. -°Olafur]


The quote is from Feb 2006 and the study above is from May 2006 so maybe we have newer information or maybe not just the old difference with regards to in vitro vs. in vivo and absorbtion/breakdown issues.

Note that the B6 in AOR orthocore is P5P, in the multi supplement I take it is (Pyridoxine). Again according to the quote above, P5P gets broken down int Pyridoxine in the digestive track before being absorbed so there is no benefit to oral administration (other than causing ulcers because it costs more). I guess you could inject it. Any thoughts?

edit: additional info

Edited by edward, 30 December 2007 - 05:04 AM.


#13 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 30 December 2007 - 06:13 AM

Note that the B6 in AOR orthocore is P5P, in the multi supplement I take it is (Pyridoxine). Again according to the quote above, P5P gets broken down int Pyridoxine in the digestive track before being absorbed so there is no benefit to oral administration (other than causing ulcers because it costs more). I guess you could inject it. Any thoughts?


PLP actually breaks down into pyridoxal, so it would be safer than pyridoxine if you decide to take the gargantuan dose used in the study. The rats got 300 mg/kg body weight/day. Using a factor of 6.2 converts to a human dose of 3.4 grams/day. Has anyone ever tried giving that much to humans?

#14 liorrh

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 388 posts
  • -1

Posted 30 December 2007 - 02:03 PM

you can at least try and disscuss somehting instead of kneejerking sheperd. that's the sense I always get here at imminst... you'r emore inclined to quote "famous life extensionists" or some hippie site than sound logic

anyway nonsense such as implying p5p supplemtation has no differnet effect than b6 supplemetation are plain garbage

rate limiting is the energy state of the liver(oxidation/phosphorilation of pyridoxine)... with p5p you already give the energy to phosphorise it rigthback when passing into the cell

Gut. 1977 Jan;18(1):23-7. Links
Vitamin B6 deficiency in chronic liver disease--evidence for increased degradation of pyridoxal-5'-phosphate.Labadarios D, Rossouw JE, McConnell JB, Davis M, Williams R.
Plasma levels of pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (PLP), the active coenzyme form of vitamin B6, were found to be significantly lower than normal in 22 out of 31 patients with decompensated cirrhosis or subacute hepatic necrosis. There was no significant difference in plasma PLP levels between those with liver disease due to alcohol and those with other varieties. When intravenous supplements with pyridoxine hydrochloride were given only 33% responded with an increase in plasma PLP. In contrast, all patients given PLP responded, although peak plasma levels were variable, the response being significantly less than that found in normal control subjects. After supplementation with pyridoxine hydrochloride, and with PLP, the urinary excretion of 4-pyridoxic acid, which is derived from the degradation of PLP, was higher in patients who showed the least increase in plasma PLP levels. Although impaired phosphorylation of pyridoxine hydrochloride may be one factor, the most likely explanation for these findings is an increased rate of PLP degradation which may be important in the pathogenesis of vitamin B6 deficiency in patients with severe liver disease.

PMID: 838399



#15 liorrh

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 388 posts
  • -1

Posted 30 December 2007 - 02:05 PM

Why is this important?

see first line in first post

#16 liorrh

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 388 posts
  • -1

Posted 30 December 2007 - 02:09 PM

In order
to be absorbed in the body the phosphorylated forms of vitamin B6 first
need to be dephosphorylized (hydrolyzed) which means that P5P gets
hydrolyzed into Pyridoxine in the digestive tract before being
absorbed, so in fact supplemental P5P doesn't have any benefits over
Pyridoxine at least not by an oral route and is definitely not worth
the higher price.


leap of logic highlighted... this means jack -to get into tissue from blood, p5p gets
dephosphorylized (god, the length of that word) and is phosphorylized back to p5p the instance in enters the cell. so...

#17 Shepard

  • Member, Director, Moderator
  • 6,360 posts
  • 932
  • Location:Auburn, AL

Posted 30 December 2007 - 03:06 PM

you can at least try and disscuss somehting instead of kneejerking sheperd


This doesn't show much except maybe another reason to use PM. I don't see what useful supplementation conclusions can be made for healthy humans by giving diabetic rats large amounts of the coenzyme form of B6. If you're going to supplement B6 at that level, it's the only form that makes sense, but again, it doesn't seem warranted by this study.

Why is this important?


If you could retard lipid glycation, you could probably slow down lipid peroxidation. Longer lived individuals usually have lower levels of lipid peroxidation.

Edited by shepard, 30 December 2007 - 03:45 PM.


#18 DukeNukem

  • Guest
  • 2,008 posts
  • 141
  • Location:Dallas, Texas

Posted 30 December 2007 - 04:49 PM

>>> If you could retard lipid glycation, you could probably slow down lipid peroxidation. Longer lived individuals usually have lower levels of lipid peroxidation. <<<

BHT, I thought, helped in this area. I just googled "bht lipid peroxidation" and it appears to help based on the links, but I'm not clever enough to really understand what I'm reading, so maybe I'm wrong.

#19 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 30 December 2007 - 11:48 PM

you can at least try and disscuss somehting instead of kneejerking sheperd.


You made the first silly post, so it's unseemly to complain about the rest of us being silly.

anyway nonsense such as implying p5p supplemtation has no differnet effect than b6 supplemetation are plain garbage

rate limiting is the energy state of the liver(oxidation/phosphorilation of pyridoxine)... with p5p you already give the energy to phosphorise it rigthback when passing into the cell


I don't get your argument. Reasonably healthy people have no trouble at all converting PN to PL, and PLP's phosphate gets cleaved off during absorption from the gut, so there's no way to save energy unless you're taking it by IV.

PLP is slightly worse than PN at raising blood PLP.

http://books.nap.edu...i...15&page=161

#20 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 31 December 2007 - 03:24 AM

>>> If you could retard lipid glycation, you could probably slow down lipid peroxidation. Longer lived individuals usually have lower levels of lipid peroxidation. <<<

BHT, I thought, helped in this area. I just googled "bht lipid peroxidation" and it appears to help based on the links, but I'm not clever enough to really understand what I'm reading, so maybe I'm wrong.


Extracts from Rosemary are more potent than BHT for controlling lipid peroxidation. Specifically Rosmarinic acit, which is water soluble, and Carnosic acid, which is fat soluble. Ursolic acid is another product from rosemary, it's used more in cosmetics than in food. These are replacing BHT and BHA in many application, and you'll find them in a lot of meat products. Life extensionists used to supplement with BHT 30 years ago. Besides inhibiting lipid peroxidation, rosemary extracts inhibit viral replication.

#21 liorrh

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 388 posts
  • -1

Posted 01 January 2008 - 12:35 PM

anyway nonsense such as implying p5p supplemtation has no differnet effect than b6 supplemetation are plain garbage

rate limiting is the energy state of the liver(oxidation/phosphorilation of pyridoxine)... with p5p you already give the energy to phosphorise it rigthback when passing into the cell


I don't get your argument. Reasonably healthy people have no trouble at all converting PN to PL

the qeustion is what is rate limiting.

, and PLP's phosphate gets cleaved off during absorption from the gut, so there's no way to save energy unless you're taking it by IV.

reread what i said about p5p absorption by tissues from plasma

PLP is slightly worse than PN at raising blood PLP.

http://books.nap.edu...i...15&page=161

I didnt see that suggested anywhere in the link

#22 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 01 January 2008 - 06:32 PM

reread what i said about p5p absorption by tissues from plasma


I still don't get it. PN gets converted to P5P in the liver, so the tissues don't care what form you take, so long as you don't take more PN than the liver can convert.

PLP is slightly worse than PN at raising blood PLP.

http://books.nap.edu...i...15&page=161

I didnt see that suggested anywhere in the link


PN at high doses raises the plasma PLP concentration and is retained more effectively than is PL (Shane, 1978). Similarly, dietary pyridoxamine (PM) and PL are about 10 percent less effective than PN in raising the plasma PLP concentration



#23 liorrh

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 388 posts
  • -1

Posted 02 January 2008 - 03:48 PM

PLP is slightly worse than PN at raising blood PLP.

http://books.nap.edu...i...15&page=161

I didnt see that suggested anywhere in the link


PN at high doses raises the plasma PLP concentration and is retained more effectively than is PL (Shane, 1978). Similarly, dietary pyridoxamine (PM) and PL are about 10 percent less effective than PN in raising the plasma PLP concentration

I read that line, nothing on p5p supplementation as you mentione in earlier post.

Edited by Michael, 04 February 2009 - 11:59 AM.


#24 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 02 January 2008 - 11:47 PM

this is rate limited.


I get you now. But the rate doesn't appear to be a problem until you get above the UL, at which point PL would be indicated.

http://www.ajcn.org/...t/full/75/4/616

3 mg pyridoxine/day will get you 60 nM P5P.
25 mg/day will get you 200 nM.

http://www.pubmedcen...ageindex=3#page

100 mg/day will get you about 430 nM.

Higher doses are hit and miss. For one group, there was no real difference between 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg/day, with the range being 340.6-478.8. For the other group, there was no real difference between 100, 200, and 300 mg/day (range 303.3-458.0), but it spiked to 689.6 at 400 mg/day.

I read that line, nothing on p5p supplementation as you mentione in earlier post.


PLP is absorbed as PL, since the phosphorylated compound cannot be absorbed. The reference probably summed PL and PLP intake and called it PL.

#25 neogenic

  • Guest
  • 481 posts
  • 6
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 22 February 2008 - 02:02 PM

Why does he state P5P/PLP is hydrolyzed to form pyridoxine? It forms Pyridoxal. It is pyridoxal-5-phosphate and can be dephosphorylated. Data has shown p5p to be superior in order of 5:1 over pyridoxine and p5p has unique data unto itself. I haven't decided which may be the superior supplement: pyridoxal, p5p, or pyridoxamine, but it is certainly not pyridoxine.

Here is a P5P monograph: http://www.thorne.co...s_monograph.pdf

#26

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 22 February 2008 - 02:13 PM

OMG it's a cat.

I think he wants a cheeseburger.

Heh. Couldn't resist.

#27 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 22 February 2008 - 09:45 PM

Why does he state P5P/PLP is hydrolyzed to form pyridoxine? It forms Pyridoxal. It is pyridoxal-5-phosphate and can be dephosphorylated.


He was corrected in post 13.

Data has shown p5p to be superior in order of 5:1 over pyridoxine and p5p has unique data unto itself. I haven't decided which may be the superior supplement: pyridoxal, p5p, or pyridoxamine, but it is certainly not pyridoxine.


Cite? The facts are that PN is both cheaper than PLP and better at raising blood PLP. PLP is only for certain seriously sick people who can't convert PN and those who believe supplement company hype.

#28 neogenic

  • Guest
  • 481 posts
  • 6
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 23 February 2008 - 05:46 AM

Why does he state P5P/PLP is hydrolyzed to form pyridoxine? It forms Pyridoxal. It is pyridoxal-5-phosphate and can be dephosphorylated.


He was corrected in post 13.

Data has shown p5p to be superior in order of 5:1 over pyridoxine and p5p has unique data unto itself. I haven't decided which may be the superior supplement: pyridoxal, p5p, or pyridoxamine, but it is certainly not pyridoxine.


Cite? The facts are that PN is both cheaper than PLP and better at raising blood PLP. PLP is only for certain seriously sick people who can't convert PN and those who believe supplement company hype.

Did you read the "full of citation" monograph I posted? There's data shwoing unique benefits to p5p. There's data showing those with liver impairment (I would assume this could be anyone transiently or acutely with drugs, alcohol, meds, etc.)...22 out of 31 had problems maintaining WNL plasma p5p levels. High dose p5p is not associated with any neuropathy, while pyridoxine is. PN may compete with p5p creating a deficiency or it may be neurotoxic itself if unconverted/excessive.
http://www.ajcn.org/...int/46/1/78.pdf This study discusses the non-linear response even with healthy people suggesting that this competition does take place at higher doses.
While it seems to be scoffed at that many may have difficulty with conversion or enzymatic deficiencies, I know there's a plethora of studies regarding another B-vitamin in the methylation pathway, folic acid...many do have trouble hitting 5-mthf. I am trying to find a study that stated plp/p5p ratio to PN was 5:1, but an excerpt from the Principles of Orthomolecularism states it is 10 times more effective. http://books.google....fyw69WETwevKLlQ

There is a number of disease states, such as Autism that have to use high dose B6 in the form of p5p to get benefit, due to the issues with a number of PLP-dependent enzyme that relate to neurotransmitters, such as DOPA, 5-HTP, and histidine decarboxylases.

Athletes or various peoples may have acute or chronic phosphatasia, which can increase hydrolysis, of which p5p may help to compensate with.

That was kind of a sweeping statement of dismissal, now if we can discuss this further scientifically I would like to proceed.

#29 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 24 February 2008 - 04:56 AM

Did you read the "full of citation" monograph I posted? There's data shwoing unique benefits to p5p.

In seriously sick people, as I acknowledged above. The overwhelming majority of supplement users will see no such benefit. It only belongs in things like autism or "My liver! My liver!" formulas, not a mainstream multi.

High dose p5p is not associated with any neuropathy, while pyridoxine is. PN may compete with p5p creating a deficiency or it may be neurotoxic itself if unconverted/excessive.
http://www.ajcn.org/...int/46/1/78.pdf This study discusses the non-linear response even with healthy people suggesting that this competition does take place at higher doses.

This is all correct, but I made those points myself in posts 13 and 24. The overwhelming majority of people need an order of magnitude less than the UL, so they don't need PL.

While it seems to be scoffed at that many may have difficulty with conversion or enzymatic deficiencies, I know there's a plethora of studies regarding another B-vitamin in the methylation pathway, folic acid...many do have trouble hitting 5-mthf.


That problem goes away with a few milligrams of B2. (Unless there's another polymorphism that I'm unaware of.)

Circulation. 2006 Jan 3;113(1):74-80.
Comment in:Circulation. 2006 Jul 25;114(4):e65; author reply e66.
Riboflavin lowers homocysteine in individuals homozygous for the MTHFR 677C->T polymorphism.
McNulty H, Dowey le RC, Strain JJ, Dunne A, Ward M, Molloy AM, McAnena LB, Hughes JP, Hannon-Fletcher M, Scott JM.
Northern Ireland Centre for Food and Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland. h.mcnulty@ulster.ac.uk

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses predict that a 25% lowering of plasma homocysteine would reduce the risk of coronary heart disease by 11% to 16% and stroke by 19% to 24%. Individuals homozygous for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C-->T polymorphism have reduced MTHFR enzyme activity resulting from the inappropriate loss of the riboflavin cofactor, but it is unknown whether their typically high homocysteine levels are responsive to improved riboflavin status. METHODS AND RESULTS: From a register of 680 healthy adults 18 to 65 years of age of known MTHFR 677C-->T genotype, we identified 35 with the homozygous (TT) genotype and age-matched individuals with heterozygous (CT, n=26) or wild-type (CC, n=28) genotypes to participate in an intervention in which participants were randomized by genotype group to receive 1.6 mg/d riboflavin or placebo for a 12-week period. Supplementation increased riboflavin status to the same extent in all genotype groups (8% to 12% response in erythrocyte glutathione reductase activation coefficient; P<0.01 in each case). However, homocysteine responded only in the TT group, with levels decreasing by as much as 22% overall (from 16.1+/-1.5 to 12.5+/-0.8 micromol/L; P=0.003; n=32) and markedly so (by 40%) in those with lower riboflavin status at baseline (from 22.0+/-2.9 and 13.2+/-1.0 micromol/L; P=0.010; n=16). No homocysteine response was observed in the CC or CT groups despite being preselected for suboptimal riboflavin status. CONCLUSIONS: Although previously overlooked, homocysteine is highly responsive to riboflavin, specifically in individuals with the MTHFR 677 TT genotype. Our findings might explain why this common polymorphism carries an increased risk of coronary heart disease in Europe but not in North America, where riboflavin fortification has existed for >50 years.

PMID: 16380544

I instinctively distrust B-vitamin megadose advocates. They throw hundreds of milligrams at the problem and then pretend that it's the required dose without doing any dose-finding experiments. Later on they end up with egg on their faces when it turns out that a moderate dose works just as well.

http://www.ajcn.org/...t/full/75/4/616

In another study, 3 patients responded to oral vitamin B-6 (600–750 mg/d) with a decrease in serum ornithine and a return to normal of reduced concentrations of serum lysine. Lower doses of vitamin B-6 (18–30 mg/d) appeared to work just as well as the high doses.


Searching PubMed for "migraine riboflavin 400" yields 6 hits. In the most recent one (TEN YEARS after the initial study) they finally figured out that only 25 mg or less is required, but it wasn't even a proper dose-finding experiment. The placebo had 25 mg, worked better than previous placebos, and even worked as well as the megadose.

Headache. 2004 Oct;44(9):885-90.
Comment in: Headache. 2006 Mar;46(3):531.
A combination of riboflavin, magnesium, and feverfew for migraine prophylaxis: a randomized trial.
Maizels M, Blumenfeld A, Burchette R.
Kaiser Permanente, Family Practice, Woodland Hills, CA, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy for migraine prophylaxis of a compound containing a combination of riboflavin, magnesium, and feverfew. BACKGROUND: Previous studies of magnesium and feverfew for migraine prophylaxis have found conflicting results, and there has been only a single placebo-controlled trial of riboflavin. DESIGN/METHODS: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of a compound providing a daily dose of riboflavin 400 mg, magnesium 300 mg, and feverfew 100 mg. The placebo contained 25 mg riboflavin. The study included a 1-month run-in phase and 3-month trial. The protocol allowed for 120 patients to be randomized, with a preplanned interim analysis of the data after 48 patients had completed the trial. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients completed the 3-month trial. For the primary outcome measure, a 50% or greater reduction in migraines, there was no difference between active and "placebo" groups, achieved by 10 (42%) and 11 (44%), respectively (P=.87). Similarly, there was no significant difference in secondary outcome measures, for active versus placebo groups, respectively: 50% or greater reduction in migraine days (33% and 40%, P=.63); or change in mean number of migraines, migraine days, migraine index, or triptan doses. Compared to baseline, however, both groups showed a significant reduction in number of migraines, migraine days, and migraine index. This effect exceeds that reported for placebo agents in previous migraine trials. CONCLUSION: Riboflavin 25 mg showed an effect comparable to a combination of riboflavin 400 mg, magnesium 300 mg, and feverfew 100 mg. The placebo response exceeds that reported for any other placebo in trials of migraine prophylaxis, and suggests that riboflavin 25 mg may be an active comparator. There is at present conflicting scientific evidence with regard to the efficacy of these compounds for migraine prophylaxis.

PMID: 15447697

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#30 neogenic

  • Guest
  • 481 posts
  • 6
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 29 February 2008 - 02:07 AM

Did you read the "full of citation" monograph I posted? There's data shwoing unique benefits to p5p.

In seriously sick people, as I acknowledged above. The overwhelming majority of supplement users will see no such benefit. It only belongs in things like autism or "My liver! My liver!" formulas, not a mainstream multi. ... The overwhelming majority of people need an order of magnitude less than the UL, so they don't need PL....

I instinctively distrust B-vitamin megadose advocates. They throw hundreds of milligrams at the problem and then pretend that it's the required dose without doing any dose-finding experiments. Later on they end up with egg on their faces when it turns out that a moderate dose works just as well.

Good post. I am doing much research on the active B's and I could debte this further, but my research is still ongoing. You bring up excellent points, though I think the potential for pyriodixine to be toxic at higher doses and plp to not be is worth noting. Further there is an enzyme that uses pyridoxamine (I'd have to look it back up), so both are "active forms". PLP at high doses could affect an interesting pathway, that simply wouldn't be possible for pyridoxine that I am reluctant to bring up just yet...again it is a significant pathway of interest here, and I want to delve further. My research is not just on b6 either, so it may not be a quick turnaround. There is much untapped potential in the vitamins and minerals regarding dose, timing and form. Unfortunately, what is difficut is the research is lacking and hypotheses, interpolation and extrapolation must be asserted.

Again, that was a wonderful post, Krillin.

Edited by Michael, 04 February 2009 - 12:05 PM.
Removing redundant quotation





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users