After reading through all the posts in this forum, I found out the importance of suncreen in a good skin care regimen. However, this has caused me to ponder which
sunscreen is truly the best sunscreen to prevent photoaging. The two big sunscreens that I have been debating against is the La Roche-Posay ANTHELIOS 60 XL CREAM(Mexoryl XL, Mexoryl SX) and Neutrogena's new Helioplex Sheer sunscreen formula. Now according to this website, http://www.savvyskin...een-ingredients, only zinc oxide and mexoryl
have the broadest range of UVA coverage. The wavelengths are drawn from the website and listed below.
Zinc Oxide 290-380
Mexoryl 290-400
Avobenzene 340-375
Titanium Dioxide 290-340
Octinoxate and Octisalate 320-240
Oxybenzone 320-240
Avobenzene and Oxybenzone(found in the helioplex Neutrogena formula) does not protect against the UV wavelenght of 320-340. On the other hand, a research study seems to indicate that Neutrogena's Helioplex formula provide a better PFA number/better UVA protection than Mexoryl SX and Mexoryl SL combined.
Quote: "Additionally, Neutrogena has released a multitude of sunscreens with Helioplex, a stabilized, patented combination of oxybenzone and avobenzone that has been demonstrated in clinical tests to provide longer-lasting UVA protection than most other sunscreens. In comparing mexoryl and Helioplex, Neutrogena Ultra Sheer SPF 70 has been reported to have a PFA value of 23.3 or 26.5, interestingly higher than the reported PFA value of 10 for Mexoryl SX and XL in combination. Therefore, based on the current reported PFA data, it seems that Neutrogena Ultra Sheer SPF 70 is even more effective than Mexoryl, providing the best UVA protection on the U.S. market." Taken from http://futurederm.wo...com/2007/10/01/.
Now considering the two pieces of information, which do you think will provide better UV protection: neutrogena helioplex or La roche Posay?