This was published today to counter some of the hyperbole going around
http://www.alcornews...gress.html#more
One issue that I do want to speak up on is the issue of patient numbers. It is being repeatedly stated that CI's number of patients is growing faster than Alcor's as if this is a sign of weakness on Alcor's part. CI takes last-minute cases with a far greater frequency than Alcor. This is because Alcor usually declines last-minute cases because of the legal and ethical risks they represent, and especially because of CI's low minimums. Last-minute cases usually pay cash, not life insurance, so they usually pay as little as they can. The result of accepting lots of cases at minimum funding is that long-term patient care funds per patient are diminished. The organization may also become top-heavy with patients compared to living members. I believe that this is not a good situation to be in. Alcor's member-to-patient ratio has been constant at about 10 for the last 20 years. CI's ratio right now is about 4. Also, all of CI's patients are whole body patients, which is a lot of kilograms of patients to be caring for.