• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

Nanomaterial turns radiation directly into electricity


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Reno

  • Guest
  • 584 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Somewhere

Posted 02 April 2008 - 05:38 AM


It'll be real nice when they come out with a car whose gas tank has a 50,000 year half life.

Materials that directly convert radiation into electricity could produce a new era of spacecraft and even Earth-based vehicles powered by high-powered nuclear batteries, say US researchers.

Electricity is usually made using nuclear power by heating steam to rotate turbines that generate electricity.

But beginning in the 1960s, the US and Soviet Union used thermoelectric materials that convert heat into electricity to power spacecraft using nuclear fission or decaying radioactive material. The Pioneer missions were among those using the latter, "nuclear battery" approach.

Dispensing with the steam and turbines makes those systems smaller and less complicated. But thermoelectric materials have very low efficiency. Now US researchers say they have developed highly efficient materials that can convert the radiation, not heat, from nuclear materials and reactions into electricity.
Power boost

Liviu Popa-Simil, former Los Alamos National Laboratory nuclear engineer and founder of private research and development company LAVM and Claudiu Muntele, of Alabama A&M University, US, say transforming the energy of radioactive particles into electricity is more effective.

The materials they are testing would extract up to 20 times more power from radioactive decay than thermoelectric materials, they calculate.

Tests of layered tiles of carbon nanotubes packed with gold and surrounded by lithium hydride are under way. Radioactive particles that slam into the gold push out a shower of high-energy electrons. They pass through carbon nanotubes and pass into the lithium hydride from where they move into electrodes, allowing current to flow.

"You load the material with nuclear energy and unload an electric current," says Popa-Simil.
Space probes

The tiles would be best used to create electricity using a radioactive material, says Popa-Simil, because they could be embedded directly where radiation is greatest. But they could also harvest power directly from a fission reactor's radiation.

Devices based on the material could be small enough to power anything from interplanetary probes to aircraft and land vehicles, he adds.

"I believe this work is innovative and could have a significant impact on the future of nuclear power," says David Poston, of the US Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory. However perfecting new nuclear technologies requires years of development, he adds.

Popa-Simil agrees, saying it will be at least a decade before final designs of the radiation-to-electricity concept are built.

A paper on the new nuclear power materials was presented on 25 March, at the Materials Research Society Spring Meeting 2008 , San Francisco, California, US.


link

#2 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 02 April 2008 - 12:08 PM

Where can we get a copy of their paper itself?

From MRS.org:
"JJ4.14
Pseudo-Capacitor Structure for Direct Nuclear Energy Conversion. Liviu Popa-Simil1 and Claudiu Muntele2; 1LAVM LLC, Los Alamos, New Mexico; 2CIM_AAMURI, Huntsville, Alabama."

#3 Reno

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 584 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Somewhere

Posted 02 April 2008 - 05:16 PM

Where can we get a copy of their paper itself?

From MRS.org:
"JJ4.14
Pseudo-Capacitor Structure for Direct Nuclear Energy Conversion. Liviu Popa-Simil1 and Claudiu Muntele2; 1LAVM LLC, Los Alamos, New Mexico; 2CIM_AAMURI, Huntsville, Alabama."


The original article can be found at the link below the quote. The source paper is linked to at its bottom.

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 02 April 2008 - 09:49 PM

Hi, I'm afraid it isn't. When I use that bottom link from the article, it just takes me to a list of papers. That's where I pasted the paper's title from. I wanted to read the paper itself.

#5 Reno

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 584 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Somewhere

Posted 03 April 2008 - 02:26 AM

Hi, I'm afraid it isn't. When I use that bottom link from the article, it just takes me to a list of papers. That's where I pasted the paper's title from. I wanted to read the paper itself.


Your right, the article links to the MRS site. Email them if you want more information.

#6 Luna

  • Guest, F@H
  • 2,528 posts
  • 66
  • Location:Israel

Posted 03 April 2008 - 12:00 PM

Dosen't it mean this is sorta of 100% recycle? as the wasted energy at any proccess is mostly turned into heat/radiation..

#7 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 1,999
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 04 April 2008 - 03:54 AM

Dosen't it mean this is sorta of 100% recycle? as the wasted energy at any proccess is mostly turned into heat/radiation..

They haven't repealed the First Law of Thermodynamics, if that's what you mean. In other words, they're not making new energy where none existed before, or anything like that. This is just a simple way of converting some of the energy of some sort of relatively high-energy radiation into electricity. This is interesting because certain radioactive materials will emit radiation for a long time, so this could represent something like a battery that lasted for decades. I would expect to see it show up in something like a deep space probe, as opposed to a cell phone.

#8 Lazarus Long

  • Life Member, Guardian
  • 8,116 posts
  • 242
  • Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York

Posted 04 April 2008 - 04:22 AM

I would expect to see it show up in something like a deep space probe, as opposed to a cell phone.


Nuclear batteries already exist in deep space exploration vehicles.
Radioisotope thermoelectric generator
http://en.wikipedia....ctric_Generator

http://en.wikipedia..../Atomic_battery
and also this

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7843868/

However when these run down do we really want them to show up in the local landfill?

#9 Luna

  • Guest, F@H
  • 2,528 posts
  • 66
  • Location:Israel

Posted 04 April 2008 - 07:41 AM

Dosen't it mean this is sorta of 100% recycle? as the wasted energy at any proccess is mostly turned into heat/radiation..

They haven't repealed the First Law of Thermodynamics, if that's what you mean. In other words, they're not making new energy where none existed before, or anything like that. This is just a simple way of converting some of the energy of some sort of relatively high-energy radiation into electricity. This is interesting because certain radioactive materials will emit radiation for a long time, so this could represent something like a battery that lasted for decades. I would expect to see it show up in something like a deep space probe, as opposed to a cell phone.


No, I defnitly did not mean the first law, note, 100% recycle, not above 100%.

When you use energy, some % of it is wasted, according to todays physics.
Gone as heat energy and is unusable.
What I am wondering if this turns the wasted energy into electricity, as, full recycle of the energy used.

#10 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 1,999
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 05 April 2008 - 03:38 AM

Dosen't it mean this is sorta of 100% recycle? as the wasted energy at any proccess is mostly turned into heat/radiation..

They haven't repealed the First Law of Thermodynamics, if that's what you mean. In other words, they're not making new energy where none existed before, or anything like that. This is just a simple way of converting some of the energy of some sort of relatively high-energy radiation into electricity. This is interesting because certain radioactive materials will emit radiation for a long time, so this could represent something like a battery that lasted for decades. I would expect to see it show up in something like a deep space probe, as opposed to a cell phone.


No, I defnitly did not mean the first law, note, 100% recycle, not above 100%.

When you use energy, some % of it is wasted, according to todays physics.
Gone as heat energy and is unusable.
What I am wondering if this turns the wasted energy into electricity, as, full recycle of the energy used.

Oh, ok. It's probably reasonably efficient; I don't know what kind of radioactive event the thing uses, alpha, beta, or gamma, but whatever it is, some of the radiation will get absorbed before it leaves the emitter, so it will generate some amount of heat or maybe some other form of radiation at an energy too low to be used. The device probably doesn't convert 100% of the radiation that hits it, either, so there would be some energy lost that way. There is probably also some energy lost in the conversion such that the electrical energy is somewhat less than the energy of whatever particles or photons went into the converter. So the usable energy output is going to be less than the total energy emitted by the radiation source, and no, it couldn't convert the heat energy to electricity. That would be a Second Law violation.

#11 Reno

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 584 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Somewhere

Posted 06 April 2008 - 04:34 AM

For all intensive purposes radiation is light. So your pretty much talking about a more efficient solar panel working at higher wavelengths.

#12 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 1,999
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 06 April 2008 - 04:45 AM

For all intensive purposes radiation is light. So your pretty much talking about a more efficient solar panel working at higher wavelengths.

Yeah, light, infra red, radio waves; they're all photons, all radiation to a physicist. Usually the word "radiation" seems to imply higher energy radiation, at least to lay people. Probably what people think of would be anything that is harmful to life, which would be any photon more energetic than purple light; UV and beyond. Also, pretty much any energetic heavy particle I think would qualify, although I don't think that low E alpha are very harmful, since they're absorbed pretty quickly, like in the top layer of the skin.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users