• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

First In-Vivo Data Showing SIRT1 Enzyme Can Suppress Tumor Development


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Anthony_Loera

  • Life Member
  • 3,170 posts
  • 748
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 16 April 2008 - 01:43 PM


From an Email I received this morning:

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Apr 16, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(NASDAQ: SIRT), a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and
developing small molecule drugs to treat diseases of aging, announced that a
research team led by the company's two Scientific Advisory Board co-chairs has
demonstrated that overexpression of the SIRT1 enzyme can suppress tumor
formation and growth in a preclinical mouse model of colon cancer, providing the
first in-vivo data that SIRT1 can suppress tumor cell development. The paper,
titled SIRT1 Deacetylase Suppresses Intestinal Tumorigenesis and Colon Cancer
Growth, appears in today's issue of the scientific journal PLoS One.

"Research data suggest that calorie restriction (CR), which is known to cause
SIRT1 expression, has a tumor suppressive effect in mammals," says paper
co-author David Sinclair, PhD, Sirtris Scientific Advisory Board Co-Chair and
Associate Professor of Pathology at Harvard Medical School. "In this study, we
proposed that the SIRT1 enzyme is responsible for many of the effects of CR,
including tumor suppression. This study clearly shows that SIRT1 can suppress
tumor development and may mediate the effect of CR. Sirtris plans to initiate a
cancer trial in humans in the second-half of this year."

"Additional studies are underway to determine other cancer models where SIRT1
overexpression may suppress tumor development," says paper co-author Leonard P.
Guarente, PhD, Sirtris Scientific Advisory Board Co-Chair and the Novartis
Professor of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The research team tested a strain of mice that physiologically mimics the early
events of human colon cancer. A mutation in the strain allows the protein
B-catenin to localize in the nucleus of cells and initiate a pathway that drives
unchecked cell proliferation. Activation of the B-catenin pathway has been found
in 90 percent of colorectal cancers, and is also activated in other cancers,
including prostate, breast, ovarian and melanoma.

The team chose this particular strain of mice because previous research showed
that calorie restriction in this strain could slow tumor development.

They bred the B-catenin colon cancer mice with mice that overexpress the SIRT1
enzyme in the gut. At four months of age, the SIRT1 overexpressing mice had a
three- to four-fold reduction in the number and size of adenomas. Adenomas are
benign growths, but over time may progress to become malignant. The research
team also found that the adenomas found in SIRT1 overexpressing mice had a
significant reduction in Ki-67, a protein expressed in proliferating cells, used
as a marker for tumor growth.

At 16 weeks of age, the study's control mice--those that did not overexpress
SIRT1--began to show signs of weight loss, fatigue, loss of appetite, weakness
and anemia, which occurs when the level of healthy red blood cells in the body
becomes too low. The SIRT1 overexpressing mice did not display such overt signs
of sickness.

The research team then demonstrated that the reduction in tumor development was
caused by the ability of SIRT1 overexpressing mice to suppress B-catenin. Using
human colon cancer cell lines whose growth is driven by active B-catenin, the
team was able to greatly reduce cancer cell proliferation with increased SIRT1
expression. In another cell line, the researchers were able to show that SIRT1
promoted the deacetylation and inactivation of B-catenin.

B-catenin, when found in large amounts in the nucleus of tumor cells, is
associated clinically with poor patient prognosis. The team examined 81 human
colon cancer tissue samples to determine the relationship between SIRT1 and
B-catenin expression. There was a significant inverse relationship between the
level of SIRT1 expression and the levels of B-catenin in the nucleus of these
cancer cells.

"This research suggests that SIRT1 activation is a potential therapeutic avenue
for certain cancers," says Sirtris Pharmaceuticals Chief Executive Officer and
Vice Chair, Christoph Westphal, MD, PhD. "Our recently announced research effort
with the National Cancer Institute to test our SIRT1 activators in multiple
cancer models, as well as ongoing work by these investigators, will help guide
our programs."



#2 malbecman

  • Guest
  • 733 posts
  • 156
  • Location:Sunny CA

Posted 16 April 2008 - 04:01 PM

Looks like a good first step, thanks Anthony......

Click HERE to rent this advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 Hedgehog

  • Guest
  • 462 posts
  • 1

Posted 16 April 2008 - 07:07 PM

Looks like a good first step, thanks Anthony......



B-catenin a component of the Wnt Pathway is a sister to the Hedgehog pathway.

I found this study which sorta makes me think you need one more thing besides simply more SIRT1 enzyme

We performed immunohistochemistry experiments to study the in vivo expression of SIRT1 in cancer specimens. We show that human SIRT1 is highly expressed in cancer cell lines as well as in tissue samples from colon carcinoma patients. Interestingly, there is a strong cytosolic component in the SIRT1 expression pattern.

http://www.ncbi.nlm....pubmed/17806102


Maybe the mouse acts different to the SIRT1 expression or in thier mouse model the SIRT1 expression is probably many folds higher then what is already found in colon cancer.

Here is another one
http://www.ncbi.nlm....pubmed/17638871

SIRT1 was significantly elevated in mice with poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas compared with those with less-advanced disease.



#4 Anthony_Loera

  • Topic Starter
  • Life Member
  • 3,170 posts
  • 748
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 16 April 2008 - 07:34 PM

Here is today's study, in detail:

http://www.plosone.o...B933CE41FB7087E

A

#5 Hedgehog

  • Guest
  • 462 posts
  • 1

Posted 16 April 2008 - 07:45 PM

Here is today's study, in detail:

http://www.plosone.o...B933CE41FB7087E

A


This is pretty interesting... they state it does two things

These data show that SIRT1 promotes the deacetylation of β-catenin, thereby reducing its ability to act as a trans-activator.

meaning it keeps β-catenin from being expressed....



We found that a subset of colon cancers express SIRT1 in the nucleus (47/81 cases; 58%).....

The constitutive presence of β-catenin in the nucleus is associated with its oncogenic function and clinically with a poor patient prognosis [29]. To test whether SIRT1 might repress β-catenin by altering its localization, immunofluorescence was performed on cells transfected with shRNA or overexpression constructs for SIRT1. Suppression of SIRT1 in the DLD1 colon cancer cells increased the amount of nuclear β−catenin while overexpression of SIRT1 in the same cell line led to a dramatic reduction in the nuclear β-catenin pool (Fig. 4G).


Now they say in some colon cancer cell lines IF b-catenin is expressed it keeps it from DNA transciption by keeping it in the cytosol... Maybe SIRT turns off la ocalization protein in the pathway as well from keeping b-catenin from being expressed...


Notice there is a HDAC in the image below... Bottom left. SIRT1 is a HDAC




Posted Image

Edited by Hedgehog, 16 April 2008 - 07:51 PM.


#6 inawe

  • Guest
  • 653 posts
  • 3

Posted 18 April 2008 - 05:06 PM

Notice there is a HDAC in the image below... Bottom left. SIRT1 is a HDAC

OK, Sirtuins are one kind of Histone deacetylases (HDACs). Actually, they
are of Class III. Besides, there are HDACs of Class I, II and IV. All
of them are enzymes that facilitate some process. The main actors of
each process are the substrate and the cofactors. Like the Sirtuins
requiring NAD(+), etc.
There are also the enzymes that promote
acethylation, the Histone Acethyl-Transferases (HATs).
Coming back to the HDACs, there is evidence that in some cases HDAC classes I and II
aid and enhance tumorigenesis, the evidence seems to be stronger in colon cancer.

Research in the field is done by:
A-Workers on classes I and II of HDAC.
Then there are other people:
B-Researchers studying class III of HDAC (like Guarente, Sinclair, etc.).
Unfortunately A and B don't seem
to be talking to each other.

In order to treat decease, mainly cancer, the As are looking for ways
to inhibit HDACs (classes I and II). Meanwhile, the Bs seem to be
convinced that the panacea for everything, including now cancer cure,
is to enhance the activity of HDAC (class III).

It is a testament to the PR talents of Sinclair that we hear much more
about B than A. This in spite that we don't know yet how much
enhancing of Sirtuin activity will help with cancer. While there is
much more evidence of the preventative properties of a simple HDAC
inhibitor: sulforaphane in broccoli.

#7 Hedgehog

  • Guest
  • 462 posts
  • 1

Posted 18 April 2008 - 05:21 PM

Notice there is a HDAC in the image below... Bottom left. SIRT1 is a HDAC

OK, Sirtuins are one kind of Histone deacetylases (HDACs). Actually, they
are of Class III. Besides, there are HDACs of Class I, II and IV. All
of them are enzymes that facilitate some process. The main actors of
each process are the substrate and the cofactors. Like the Sirtuins
requiring NAD(+), etc.
There are also the enzymes that promote
acethylation, the Histone Acethyl-Transferases (HATs).
Coming back to the HDACs, there is evidence that in some cases HDAC classes I and II
aid and enhance tumorigenesis, the evidence seems to be stronger in colon cancer.

Research in the field is done by:
A-Workers on classes I and II of HDAC.
Then there are other people:
B-Researchers studying class III of HDAC (like Guarente, Sinclair, etc.).
Unfortunately A and B don't seem
to be talking to each other.

In order to treat decease, mainly cancer, the As are looking for ways
to inhibit HDACs (classes I and II). Meanwhile, the Bs seem to be
convinced that the panacea for everything, including now cancer cure,
is to enhance the activity of HDAC (class III).

It is a testament to the PR talents of Sinclair that we hear much more
about B than A. This in spite that we don't know yet how much
enhancing of Sirtuin activity will help with cancer. While there is
much more evidence of the preventative properties of a simple HDAC
inhibitor: sulforaphane in broccoli.


Yes. Here is a theory....

class III (SIRT1) might turn off genes that the cancer needs if it is stimulated (Link Wnt).
Class I & II turns off genes that a cancer cell needs inorder to die. Thus if you inhibit Class I & II you actually should help cancer cells die

It all boils down to which genes get turned off by the HDACS, same thing with HATS it all depends on which genes it helps to activate.

#8 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 18 April 2008 - 10:12 PM

OK, Sirtuins are one kind of Histone deacetylases (HDACs). Actually, they are of Class III. Besides, there are HDACs of Class I, II and IV.

In your butyrate experiments, could you tell if it was interfering with resveratrol's sirtuin activation? Or do we have to enlist Maxwatt's toe to verify the below?

Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003 Sep;60(9):1990-7.
Differential regulation of the Sir2 histone deacetylase gene family by inhibitors of class I and II histone deacetylases.
Kyrylenko S, Kyrylenko O, Suuronen T, Salminen A.
Department of Neuroscience and Neurology, University of Kuopio, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.

The Sir2 histone deacetylase gene family consists of seven mammalian sirtuins (SIRTs) which are NAD-dependent histone/protein deacetylases. Sir2 proteins regulate, for instance, genome stability by chromatin silencing in yeast. In mammals, their function is still largely unknown. Due to the NAD+ dependency, Sir2 might be the link between metabolic activity and histone/protein acetylation. Regulation of gene expression also seems to play an important role in Sir2 functions, since increasing the dosage of Sir2 genes increases genome stability in yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans. We observed that the modification of histone/protein acetylation status by several class I and II histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors induces differential changes in gene expression profiles of seven SIRT mRNAs in cultured neuronal cells. SIRT2, SIRT4 and SIRT7 were upregulated, whereas SIRT1, SIRT5 and SIRT6 were downregulated by trichostatin A (TSA) and n-butyrate. The upregulation of SIRT mRNAs was inhibited by actinomycin D. Interestingly, the regulation of SIRT mRNAs was highly similar both in mouse Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells and post-mitotic rat primary hippocampal and cerebellar granule neurons. Using a chromatin immunoprecipitation technique, we showed that the upregulation of SIRT2 expression with TSA is related to the hyperacetylation of DNA-bound histone H4 within the first 500 bp upstream of the transcription start site of the SIRT2 gene. Chemically different types of HDAC inhibitors, such as TSA, apicidin, SAHA, M344 and n-butyrate induced remarkably similar responses in SIRT1-7 mRNA expression patterns. Differential responses in SIRT mRNA expression profiles indicate that the expression of the Sir2 family of genes is selectively regulated and dependent on histone/protein acetylation status.

PMID: 14523559

#9 inawe

  • Guest
  • 653 posts
  • 3

Posted 19 April 2008 - 12:22 AM

OK, Sirtuins are one kind of Histone deacetylases (HDACs). Actually, they are of Class III. Besides, there are HDACs of Class I, II and IV.

In your butyrate experiments, could you tell if it was interfering with resveratrol's sirtuin activation? Or do we have to enlist Maxwatt's toe to verify the below?

Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003 Sep;60(9):1990-7.
Differential regulation of the Sir2 histone deacetylase gene family by inhibitors of class I and II histone deacetylases.
Kyrylenko S, Kyrylenko O, Suuronen T, Salminen A.
Department of Neuroscience and Neurology, University of Kuopio, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.

The Sir2 histone deacetylase gene family consists of seven mammalian sirtuins (SIRTs) which are NAD-dependent histone/protein deacetylases. Sir2 proteins regulate, for instance, genome stability by chromatin silencing in yeast. In mammals, their function is still largely unknown. Due to the NAD+ dependency, Sir2 might be the link between metabolic activity and histone/protein acetylation. Regulation of gene expression also seems to play an important role in Sir2 functions, since increasing the dosage of Sir2 genes increases genome stability in yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans. We observed that the modification of histone/protein acetylation status by several class I and II histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors induces differential changes in gene expression profiles of seven SIRT mRNAs in cultured neuronal cells. SIRT2, SIRT4 and SIRT7 were upregulated, whereas SIRT1, SIRT5 and SIRT6 were downregulated by trichostatin A (TSA) and n-butyrate. The upregulation of SIRT mRNAs was inhibited by actinomycin D. Interestingly, the regulation of SIRT mRNAs was highly similar both in mouse Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells and post-mitotic rat primary hippocampal and cerebellar granule neurons. Using a chromatin immunoprecipitation technique, we showed that the upregulation of SIRT2 expression with TSA is related to the hyperacetylation of DNA-bound histone H4 within the first 500 bp upstream of the transcription start site of the SIRT2 gene. Chemically different types of HDAC inhibitors, such as TSA, apicidin, SAHA, M344 and n-butyrate induced remarkably similar responses in SIRT1-7 mRNA expression patterns. Differential responses in SIRT mRNA expression profiles indicate that the expression of the Sir2 family of genes is selectively regulated and dependent on histone/protein acetylation status.

PMID: 14523559

Just came to check my computer stuff and found this. I'm in a hurry so I'll write more tomorrow. I think this paper which I didn't know, is very important. At least one group of researchers crosslinking effects on classes I and II, with III.
Thanks

Click HERE to rent this advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#10 inawe

  • Guest
  • 653 posts
  • 3

Posted 19 April 2008 - 08:56 PM

OK, Sirtuins are one kind of Histone deacetylases (HDACs). Actually, they are of Class III. Besides, there are HDACs of Class I, II and IV.

In your butyrate experiments, could you tell if it was interfering with resveratrol's sirtuin activation? Or do we have to enlist Maxwatt's toe to verify the below?

Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003 Sep;60(9):1990-7.
Differential regulation of the Sir2 histone deacetylase gene family by inhibitors of class I and II histone deacetylases.
Kyrylenko S, Kyrylenko O, Suuronen T, Salminen A.
Department of Neuroscience and Neurology, University of Kuopio, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.

PMID: 14523559

I'll like to get a copy of the full paper to see if I can learn
something about HDCAs. ""SIRT2, SIRT4 and SIRT7 were upregulated,
whereas SIRT1, SIRT5 and SIRT6 were downregulated by trichostatin A
(TSA) and n-butyrate. Why this big difference?
While it's not clear that Sirtuins can do anything to prevent cancer,
there are indications that butyrate IS a colon cancer preventative.
I'll continue to take it.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users