• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

What gene mods would you give your future child? And at what price?


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

Poll: Gene-tweaking your unborn child when you only can afford three mods... (16 member(s) have cast votes)

first tweak would be...

  1. appearance/very good looking (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  2. extreme longevity (4 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  3. extremely good health/immunity to disease (3 votes [18.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.75%

  4. very high intelligence and superior memory (8 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  5. a great sense of humor (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. a very magnetic/charming personality (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  7. super regeneration of injuries (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  8. extreme athletic/warrior talent (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  9. experimental psi abilities (if they were proven to actually exist...) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  10. no need for sleep (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  11. natural born leader (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  12. super linguist (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  13. genius in one specific artistic field (music, painting, sculpture, voice, writing, etc.) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  14. gills (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  15. wings and can actually fly (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

second tweak...

  1. appearance/very good looking (2 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  2. extreme longevity (5 votes [31.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.25%

  3. extremely good health/immunity to disease (2 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  4. very high intelligence and superior memory (4 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  5. a great sense of humor (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. a very magnetic/charming personality (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  7. super regeneration of injuries (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  8. extreme athletic/warrior talent (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  9. experimental psi abilities (if they were proven to actually exist...) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  10. no need for sleep (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  11. natural born leader (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  12. super linguist (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  13. genius in one specific artistic field (music, painting, sculpture, voice, writing, etc.) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  14. gills (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  15. wings and can actually fly (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

third tweak...

  1. appearance/very good looking (4 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  2. extreme longevity (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  3. extremely good health/immunity to disease (2 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  4. very high intelligence and superior memory (6 votes [37.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.50%

  5. a great sense of humor (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. a very magnetic/charming personality (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  7. super regeneration of injuries (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  8. extreme athletic/warrior talent (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  9. experimental psi abilities (if they were proven to actually exist...) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  10. no need for sleep (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  11. natural born leader (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  12. super linguist (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  13. genius in one specific artistic field (music, painting, sculpture, voice, writing, etc.) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  14. gills (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  15. wings and can actually fly (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 John_Ventureville

  • Guest
  • 279 posts
  • 6
  • Location:Planet Earth

Posted 14 May 2008 - 01:32 AM


If you had the option of your own highly customized designer child, what mods would you spend your hard earned money on? And if you had multiple children, would you try to diversify and have kids who were each very different in their talents and abilities? Just how much money would you be willing to spend to give your child an edge? Would you mortgage your home? Will the decision of future parents to buy the right gene mods for their children, be the equivalent of today's parents who save up for their kids college educations?

John Grigg

#2 forever freedom

  • Guest
  • 2,369 posts
  • 68
  • Location:Munich

Posted 14 May 2008 - 03:23 AM

I'm assuming i would have a boy. I chose extreme longevity, natural born leader (would trade that for very good looks if it was a girl), and very high intelligence and superior memory.


If i could add one more quality, it would probably be "no need for sleep" (unless the boy was bound to be an ugly creature then i would choose looks but basing it on my looks, and most of my family's looks, humility apart, the chances of an ugly boy would be slim). I don't see many practical uses for the ability of flying (worse if the person had wings), other than a very relaxing and fun activity and a big show off.




But hey i don't care about this since i don't plan on having kids. If we could change ourselves then it would be nice. We need to get the technology going and the retrogrades out of our way. Time is running fast and it doesn't wait for generations of closed minded people barring technology as much as they can to die.

#3 dr_chaos

  • Guest
  • 143 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Vienna

Posted 14 May 2008 - 10:44 AM

I'm assuming i would have a boy. I chose extreme longevity, natural born leader (would trade that for very good looks if it was a girl), and very high intelligence and superior memory.

There is no such thing as a born leader. Apart from that I think everyone will choose the same things you choose. But seriously. You should reconsider your opinion on wings.
Posted Image Posted Image

I don't see many practical uses for the ability of flying (worse if the person had wings), other than a very relaxing and fun activity and a big show off.



sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 forever freedom

  • Guest
  • 2,369 posts
  • 68
  • Location:Munich

Posted 14 May 2008 - 05:26 PM

Nah wings sucks... if i could fly i wouldn't want wings. Of course that blonde there i don't mind if she has wings, but for most people it wouldn't look very attractice...


ANd by "born leader", i understood it as someone who has leading habilities, like a high emotional EQ, and other interpersonal skills needed for someone to be considered a "born leader".

Edited by sam988, 14 May 2008 - 05:28 PM.


#5 Ben Simon

  • Guest
  • 352 posts
  • 3
  • Location:London

Posted 15 May 2008 - 01:52 AM

Dudes.

I want wings.

...Yes.

Seriously. How long are we talking before I get me some wings.

#6 forever freedom

  • Guest
  • 2,369 posts
  • 68
  • Location:Munich

Posted 15 May 2008 - 03:09 AM

Dudes.

I want wings.

...Yes.

Seriously. How long are we talking before I get me some wings.



Ok here you are. No need for the "wings" wish anymore.

http://www.impactlab...the-flying-man/

#7 VictorBjoerk

  • Member, Life Member
  • 1,763 posts
  • 91
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 15 May 2008 - 01:51 PM

No need for sleep would be practical,Imagine what could be achieved

#8 Ben Simon

  • Guest
  • 352 posts
  • 3
  • Location:London

Posted 15 May 2008 - 09:24 PM

No need for sleep would be practical,Imagine what could be achieved


I'm up for that. But I'd want to keep the ability to sleep if I chose to. Could be nice to sign off every once in a while.

What? No lasers for eyes? ...Come on guys.

#9 Anaxim

  • Guest
  • 31 posts
  • 0

Posted 16 May 2008 - 07:10 AM

I'd be very wary of 'no need for sleep'. The relationship between the brain and sleep is not that well understood, and removing the need for sleep would be very risky. Besides, imagine taking care of a baby that would cry 24 hours a day...




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users