Barack Obama won the democratic nomination for president!
Finally the democratic primary is over!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7434791.stm
Posted 04 June 2008 - 04:22 AM
Posted 04 June 2008 - 04:26 AM
Posted 04 June 2008 - 04:48 AM
Hmm. YouTube pulled the video already. Maybe Hillary threatened them.
Posted 04 June 2008 - 05:40 AM
Posted 04 June 2008 - 06:06 AM
My happiness is tempered a lot by knowing that should he win in the fall, he will inherit a horrific mess that the Republicans have produced. His hands will be tied in a variety of ways, and he may be blamed for what are really Republican chickens coming home to roost. He's still our best hope, imho.you must be very happyHmm. YouTube pulled the video already. Maybe Hillary threatened them.
Posted 04 June 2008 - 06:15 AM
Apparently Obama, by almost a 3 to 1 margin: http://www.imminst.o...ama-t20395.htmlCongrats to Obama. Now do you guys prefer mccain or obama?
Posted 04 June 2008 - 01:51 PM
Posted 04 June 2008 - 05:23 PM
he cured my blindness
here's to diplomatic talks with Iran... I wonder, am i the only one afraid of Islamic countries with nuclear power?
Posted 04 June 2008 - 09:44 PM
I have several opinions about Iran establishing a nuclear program.he cured my blindness
here's to diplomatic talks with Iran... I wonder, am i the only one afraid of Islamic countries with nuclear power?
Posted 04 June 2008 - 10:05 PM
Look at it this way: McCain's approach is more of the same Bush policies, and look how that turned out. How could Obama, a smart guy who will have good advisors, be any worse? I think he's highly likely to be better.I'm not really sure if Obama is able to deal with these issues as well as McCain would..
Posted 04 June 2008 - 10:19 PM
Let's also put it this way ...Look at it this way: McCain's approach is more of the same Bush policies, and look how that turned out. How could Obama, a smart guy who will have good advisors, be any worse? I think he's highly likely to be better.I'm not really sure if Obama is able to deal with these issues as well as McCain would..
Edited by Kostas, 04 June 2008 - 10:29 PM.
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:30 PM
I have several opinions about Iran establishing a nuclear program.he cured my blindness
here's to diplomatic talks with Iran... I wonder, am i the only one afraid of Islamic countries with nuclear power?
1. Under the UN nuclear proliferation treaty they are allowed to establish a civil nuclear program. However, knowing Iran's history they will certainly most likely try to enrich uranium to weapons grade yield in secret.
2. Iran is not stupid enough to create nuclear weapons with a 1 kiloton yield or more, or in other words a nuclear bomb. But their true objective would most likely be to use the depleted uranium rods as warheads in tanks, missiles, or artillery rounds like the Americans do.
3. If they build an atomic bomb and use it, Israel, NATO, and America would literary wipe Iran off the map in no time. And even if they use depleted uranium rods in tanks, missiles, or artillery, Iran has no chance against fighting America and Israel.
4. While Iran poses no military threat by establishing a nuclear program, there is the possibility they could hand over nuclear material to terrorists and that is extremely dangerous.
As long as Iran has ties to terrorist organizations, I do not support their nuclear ambitions.
But if we sit down and negotiate with Iran, there is a large chance they can become our ally. I mean Iran even congratulated Bush when we over threw the Taliban and Saddam (Iran's two biggest enemies).
I have a couple of friends from Iran, and Iran is actually a pretty modern secular society. Our media has completely blown things out of proportion.
Posted 08 June 2008 - 04:17 AM
Posted 08 June 2008 - 05:09 AM
Not too long ago, when presented with some negative facts about McCain, you said:Just damn. Obama seems to be rather young to be showing symptoms like this. Should we be concerned?
So I guess you finished that work?In any case, I don't have time for you. I've actually got real work to do for the welfare of our country that has nothing to do with politics.
Posted 08 June 2008 - 05:18 AM
Concerned because he got distracted from someone yelling at him? (which was obviously not picked up by the mic, but he was talking to)Just damn. Obama seems to be rather young to be showing symptoms like this. Should we be concerned?
Posted 08 June 2008 - 09:52 AM
Concerned because he got distracted from someone yelling at him? (which was obviously not picked up by the mic, but he was talking to)Just damn. Obama seems to be rather young to be showing symptoms like this. Should we be concerned?
Edited by ludongbin, 08 June 2008 - 10:04 AM.
Posted 08 June 2008 - 10:06 AM
Not too long ago, when presented with some negative facts about McCain, you said:Just damn. Obama seems to be rather young to be showing symptoms like this. Should we be concerned?
So I guess you finished that work?In any case, I don't have time for you. I've actually got real work to do for the welfare of our country that has nothing to do with politics.
Posted 09 June 2008 - 05:49 AM
Posted 09 June 2008 - 05:59 AM
This is a sweet graphic! Check it out
http://graphics8.nyt...HIC/margins.swf
Posted 09 June 2008 - 02:50 PM
Posted 09 June 2008 - 03:08 PM
Posted 09 June 2008 - 03:14 PM
Posted 11 June 2008 - 12:35 AM
how about Captain Kirk for president
Posted 11 June 2008 - 01:10 AM
LOL.
As I increase in income, the distribution shifts over to the Obama side.
As I increase in age, the distribution shifts to the Clinton side.
As I increase in education, the distribution shifts to the Obama side.
Even if I knew nothing about what each candidate stood for, that information alone would be enough for me to decide between the two. I wonder what Ron Paul's distribution looks like.
Edited by Fear&Obey, 11 June 2008 - 01:17 AM.
Posted 11 June 2008 - 02:07 AM
I'm pretty sure that if you look at income over a wider range, the more well-off people would have trended toward Obama. Old people liked Clinton a lot. She totally had the post-menopausal vote locked up. If someone owns neither a cell phone nor a computer, they were probably Clinton people. Oh well, water under the bridge. What counts now is Obama vs. McCain.LOL.
As I increase in income, the distribution shifts over to the Obama side.
As I increase in age, the distribution shifts to the Clinton side.
As I increase in education, the distribution shifts to the Obama side.
Even if I knew nothing about what each candidate stood for, that information alone would be enough for me to decide between the two. I wonder what Ron Paul's distribution looks like.
The highest income bracket they go by is a family making $50,000. That's poverty if you ask me. Besides, I don't see what the hell you're talking about, they're all smack dab in the middle for each income bracket.
Younger people happen to be less white and don't remember that Clinton was a good president. They're also usually stupid.
Although, the education thing I could only disagree with by being extremely biased, assuming flawed somehow... Weren't asians for Clinton?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users