• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

UVB does more damage to DNA than UVA: new report in FASEB journal


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Fredrik

  • Guest
  • 570 posts
  • 136
  • Location:Right here, right now
  • NO

Posted 02 July 2008 - 04:26 PM


This is a new report, but we already knew this. I feel the danger of UVB have been underplayed the last couple of years. Maybe this has a bit to do with Loreal launching their UVA mexoryl filter in the US.

UVB does more damage to DNA than UVA
New report in The FASEB Journal may lead to independence from skin cancer


Bethesda, MD—As bombs burst in air this July 4, chances are that sunburn will be the red glare that most folks see – and feel. But unfortunately, even when there is no burn, the effects of the sun's ultraviolet (UV) rays can have deadly consequences. Thanks to a new research study published in the July 2008 issue of The FASEB Journal, scientists now know why one type of UV light (UVB) is more likely to cause skin cancer than the other (UVA). This information should be useful to public health officials and government regulatory agencies in identifying specific criteria for exactly how effective consumer products, like sunscreen, are in preventing skin damage leading to skin cancer. It should also allow scientists to pursue new lines of research and treatment into repairing the damage caused by the sun's rays.

"Our study is novel in that it fills the gaps in knowledge of mechanisms involved in sunlight-associated skin cancers, which cover various aspects of DNA damage and repair and genetic alterations," said Ahmad Besaratinia, PhD, Assistant Research Scientist at City of Hope National Medical Center and first author on the report.

According to researchers from City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, California, UVB light is more harmful to our skin because our bodies are less able to repair the DNA damage it causes than the damage caused by UVA light. To reach their conclusions, scientists exposed three sets of cells to UVA light, UVB light and simulated sunlight. Then they compared these cells to an unexposed control group to analyze how well these cells were able to repair the damage. In addition, they analyzed published data on the genetics involved in human skin cancers. The researchers found that cells were more easily able to repair the damage caused by the UVA light, which explains why UVA light has been perceived as "safer" than UVB light. Despite this perception, scientists and public health experts caution that UVA light can and does cause serious damage that can and does lead to skin cancer.

"We know that sunlight causes skin cancer and that breakdown of the ozone layer exposes us to ever more ultraviolet radiation. This work tells us that both forms of UVA and UVB in sunlight cause damage to DNA. It forms a missing link in the chain of events from sun exposure to tumor formation," said Gerald Weissmann, MD, Editor-in-Chief of The FASEB Journal. "This research article gives us information that could lead to better sunscreens or effective 'after sun' products. It promises new ways to prevent - and perhaps to treat - the epidemic of skin cancer brought on by modern life."

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the United States. Of the top three forms of skin cancer, melanoma is the most dangerous with about 65 percent to 90 percent of melanomas caused by exposure to ultraviolet rays. The other two most common, but less dangerous, types of skin cancer are basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas.

The FASEB Journal (http://www.fasebj.org) is published by the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) and is the most cited biology journal worldwide according to the Institute for Scientific Information. FASEB comprises 21 nonprofit societies with more than 80,000 members, making it the largest coalition of biomedical research associations in the United States. FASEB advances biological science through collaborative advocacy for research policies that promote scientific progress and education and lead to improvements in human health.


http://www.fasebj.or...ssRelease.shtml


Edited by Fredrik, 02 July 2008 - 05:00 PM.


#2 sdxl

  • Guest
  • 391 posts
  • 47
  • Location:Earth

Posted 02 July 2008 - 06:20 PM

I don't see how UVB protection is underplayed, as it's covered by the SPF and even US sunscreens can achieve high SPF's. Not with the best combinations, but it's possible.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for AGELESS LOOKS to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 Ben

  • Guest
  • 2,010 posts
  • -2
  • Location:South East

Posted 03 July 2008 - 02:23 AM

I agree, I think it's underplayed on this board but most authorities focus more on UVB than UVA.

#4 Fredrik

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 570 posts
  • 136
  • Location:Right here, right now
  • NO

Posted 03 July 2008 - 05:26 AM

I don't see how UVB protection is underplayed, as it's covered by the SPF and even US sunscreens can achieve high SPF's. Not with the best combinations, but it's possible.


Yeah, It´s covered by the SPF rating. But I think the debate has been to much about UVA lately. I just threw this out to balance it a bit. It´s not either/or. Both UVB & UVA damage and prematurely ages the skin and increase the risk of cancer.

#5 caston

  • Guest
  • 2,141 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 03 July 2008 - 09:14 AM

I don't see how UVB protection is underplayed, as it's covered by the SPF and even US sunscreens can achieve high SPF's. Not with the best combinations, but it's possible.


Yeah, It´s covered by the SPF rating. But I think the debate has been to much about UVA lately. I just threw this out to balance it a bit. It´s not either/or. Both UVB & UVA damage and prematurely ages the skin and increase the risk of cancer.



All radiation can be damaging. Even blue light is said to be pretty bad such as for the retina.

#6 Eva Victoria

  • Guest
  • 887 posts
  • 22
  • Location:Norway

Posted 03 July 2008 - 10:51 AM

This is a new report, but we already knew this. I feel the danger of UVB have been underplayed the last couple of years. Maybe this has a bit to do with Loreal launching their UVA mexoryl filter in the US.

UVB does more damage to DNA than UVA
New report in The FASEB Journal may lead to independence from skin cancer

http://www.fasebj.or...ssRelease.shtml



What they also mention in this article is that both UVB and UVA causes damage to our DNA.
UVB: visible damage: Skincancer: BCC; SCC; AK
UVA: invisible damage: Skincancer: MM (Malignant Melanoma).

With this knowledge in mind L'Oreal has focused early on the importance of furmulating sunscreens with adequate UVA protection. They are the pioneers of modern UVA protection (formulating good filter combos without the need of physical filters).
It is equally important to protect against both type of rays.

BTW, it has also been stated that light itself (without UVR) damages our skin and leads to accumalated aging.

Edited by Eva Victoria, 03 July 2008 - 11:01 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users