What two video cards would give me the most PPD for under say $500 (~$250 per video card) for this setup?

Posted 01 November 2008 - 07:17 PM
Posted 01 November 2008 - 08:21 PM
Posted 01 November 2008 - 09:24 PM
Posted 01 November 2008 - 10:49 PM
Is this rig only for folding purposes?
if yes, your components are too overkill.
Edited by maestro949, 01 November 2008 - 10:50 PM.
Posted 02 November 2008 - 12:10 AM
Then 9800GX2 sounds like a best bet.Is this rig only for folding purposes?
if yes, your components are too overkill.
No. It'll be used for 64-bit development / testing of Vista deployed apps but will be idle most of the time thus a good candidate for doubling as a folding rig. So really I'm just looking for the two best cards (or single monster card) I can throw into it to max PPD. $500 max for the card(s).
Posted 02 November 2008 - 12:23 AM
at the moment, 3 GPU system is the cheapest. as you can run it on regular board, and power supply.How much can you get me one of these 4 gpu rigs built for? How much will I have to send you at a normal rate, and how much can you get it built for me for at this 30% off parts rate?
Also, my boss also owns a computer business. Can you list the parts I would need him to use to build it for me? Ill send the parts list through him and get a bid too. He might charge me commercial prices, Im not sure.
Posted 02 November 2008 - 11:05 AM
Then 9800GX2 sounds like a best bet.Is this rig only for folding purposes?
if yes, your components are too overkill.
No. It'll be used for 64-bit development / testing of Vista deployed apps but will be idle most of the time thus a good candidate for doubling as a folding rig. So really I'm just looking for the two best cards (or single monster card) I can throw into it to max PPD. $500 max for the card(s).
I've got one, and it is doing 11k - 12k PPD
so, slap in both, then you've got 22k+ PPD.
Make sure you have the 8 PIN PCIE connector
Edited by maestro949, 02 November 2008 - 06:31 PM.
Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:45 PM
Posted 04 November 2008 - 09:14 AM
Edited by poser, 04 November 2008 - 09:22 AM.
Posted 05 November 2008 - 08:17 AM
For anyone looking for best bang for your buck, there's only 2 routes you can go:Hi chungenhung. I bet you have 'ingested' a great amount of useful information about building folding@home rigs. Would you like to help me?
Do you use cases? If so, why? Is it more efficient energy wise to not use cases and then use one big cooler than 3-4 little case coolers? What systems you have? Why did you abandon the thought of AMD?
I've been folding for now with just ATI 3870. I will sell it, crappy PPD/W and PPD/$. I haven't realized that I've suffered probably quite a lot because of the electric bill.
You have had a lot of 8800 GT's I gather. They are energy efficient. Have you decided not to use many 9800 GX2's because of the electric bill / price or other reasons like cooling problems? I would like to use them because of the big PPD but I shudder at their relative inefficiency compared to 8800 GS and similar cards. We're talking about hundreds of dollars of difference in the electric bill in two years.
The system I would go ahead first would be a mb with space for preferably 4 double size cards - are those expensive? I would first buy only 1 card and when I get more money, buy more. But I read that PPD goes down if you don't have all same cards, is that true? And a quad core because the rest will be running Rosetta. Is it possible to use XP64 to feed 4 9800 GX2's with one core? Can I play games with XP64 (or are there other real problems)?
Please remind me of other important POV's I haven't considered here.
Edited by chungenhung, 05 November 2008 - 08:20 AM.
Posted 05 November 2008 - 09:35 AM
For anyone looking for best bang for your buck, there's only 2 routes you can go:Hi chungenhung. I bet you have 'ingested' a great amount of useful information about building folding@home rigs. Would you like to help me?
Do you use cases? If so, why? Is it more efficient energy wise to not use cases and then use one big cooler than 3-4 little case coolers? What systems you have? Why did you abandon the thought of AMD?
I've been folding for now with just ATI 3870. I will sell it, crappy PPD/W and PPD/$. I haven't realized that I've suffered probably quite a lot because of the electric bill.
You have had a lot of 8800 GT's I gather. They are energy efficient. Have you decided not to use many 9800 GX2's because of the electric bill / price or other reasons like cooling problems? I would like to use them because of the big PPD but I shudder at their relative inefficiency compared to 8800 GS and similar cards. We're talking about hundreds of dollars of difference in the electric bill in two years.
The system I would go ahead first would be a mb with space for preferably 4 double size cards - are those expensive? I would first buy only 1 card and when I get more money, buy more. But I read that PPD goes down if you don't have all same cards, is that true? And a quad core because the rest will be running Rosetta. Is it possible to use XP64 to feed 4 9800 GX2's with one core? Can I play games with XP64 (or are there other real problems)?
Please remind me of other important POV's I haven't considered here.
First route:
AMD x2 3800 CPU
MSI K9A2 Platinum (4 PCIEx16 slots)
2x1GB RAM
4x 9600GSO
Second route:
Intel celeron E1200 dual core
Jetway J775GT2-LOG (3 PCIE slots)
2x1GB RAM
3x 9600GSO
My experience:
If you are going to run a 4 GPU system, you need a really good power supply, providing enough power on 12V rails (at least 3 rails)
If you are running only 3 GPU, any decent power supply will do. As 9600gso don't eat too much power.
9600gso is the best card, because they are dirt cheap and product 4500ppd per card. AMD or Intel system is only of personal preference. For AMD, the CPU is cheaper, but the MSI board is expensive.
For Intel, the CPU is more expensive, but the Jetway motherboard is dirt cheap.
9800GX2 is not feasible, as they are very expensive and you would have a hard time removing the heat. I run my computers open case.
You must have the same GPU in the system, or else you will get really low PPD.
Posted 05 November 2008 - 05:11 PM
8800GT will get you a little bit higher PPD. but their cost does not justify the benefit.That's great detail Chung. Is the 8800 (GT whatever at say 512mb) equivalent to the high end 9600's ?
Posted 05 November 2008 - 09:06 PM
8800GT will get you a little bit higher PPD. but their cost does not justify the benefit.That's great detail Chung. Is the 8800 (GT whatever at say 512mb) equivalent to the high end 9600's ?
No, 9600gso is always inferior, as they have only 96SP, VS 8800GT 112SP.
Posted 08 November 2008 - 12:47 AM
OK Time for a bit of ARBITRAGE.8800GT will get you a little bit higher PPD. but their cost does not justify the benefit.That's great detail Chung. Is the 8800 (GT whatever at say 512mb) equivalent to the high end 9600's ?
No, 9600gso is always inferior, as they have only 96SP, VS 8800GT 112SP.
Posted 08 November 2008 - 02:12 AM
Posted 10 November 2008 - 06:26 PM
Posted 10 November 2008 - 08:00 PM
READ THE TOPIC BEFORE POSTING!I have an old IBM laptop that runs Windows XP. It's very slow so I was wondering if I could make it faster. Can't afford new laptop.
Thanks
Posted 14 January 2010 - 09:27 PM
8800GT will get you a little bit higher PPD. but their cost does not justify the benefit.
No, 9600gso is always inferior, as they have only 96SP, VS 8800GT 112SP.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users