• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Raw Meat Diet?


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1 katzenjammer

  • Guest
  • 292 posts
  • 10

Posted 17 July 2008 - 12:56 PM


I've been reading with great interest the thread on "Foods containing AGE" and I thought I'd start a thread on a related topic. For some time now, I've been considering moving to an all raw meat diet.

Check out this guy who has been doing it for 47 years. He claims that humans are not adapted to veggies (and certainly not sugars or grains) but to eating raw meat. He's put on mucho lean body mass and has less than 10% bodyfat, and is in his seventies. He's never hungry.

This is his first post in a very long thread that gets pretty nasty. But there are some very interesting posts.

http://forum.lowcarb...?...age=1&pp=28

The real human diet is a totally carnivorous one.

Hello all,

I have been eating the natural human dietary regime for over 47 years now. I do not eat anything whatsoever from vegetable sources. The only things veggie I use are spices. My diet is usually 60% fat and 40% protein by calories. I used to eat 80/20 when younger and about twice as much quantity of meat also, but that seems too much energy at my age, which is 71- even though I am very active. I think the body actually becomes more efficient with energy as you age, but I have no way of proving it true. Otherwise, my body today is very like it was at the age of 30. I figure most of what we call 'aging' is due to insulin damage to the collagen and other body structures. No carbs = no insulin. I don't heal quite as fast when injured as I did as a youngster, however. But I have few wrinkles, and my skin is still strong and elastic.

At this point I would like to point out that a zero carb diet does NOT cause ketosis. The body rapidly adapts within a few weeks and begins consuming the ketones from fat metabolism. A fully keto-adapted body excretes no ketones in the urine. A metabolic by product, 'ketone bodies' are actually a special kind of carb, and they substitute for glucose at the structures which use it. They have the added advantage of making you feel good- and well fed.

The body cannot store dietary fat, there is no mechanism for transport across the adipose cell's wall, nor can it 'burn' carbs, which actually are toxic in more than the tiny amount required by the brain and a few other structures. The body converts dietary carbs (all convert to glucose as they are absorbed) into body fat. The conversion mechanism requires insulin which is very tissue-damaging. It is correct to say that dietary carbs are the base cause of both heart blockage and diabetes, (not a disease).

I must warn all of you that it is very unlikely that very many will be able to eat as I do over the long term, or in fact, to follow any diet for long which is much different from the one you were trained to as a baby/child. This is because diet is learned much the same way language, dress and behaviour is, and is buried deep and inaccessible, a part of your acculturation/socialisation. The very thing which makes us human is that deep and almost instinctive complex of behaviour.

It requires a powerful will and a determination to change, in order to succeed in adopting the 'extreme' diet which this website is based on. Even those who are morbidly obese, as powerful a motivation as any I can imagine will have 'cravings' for what I call 'non-food' (all vegetation and carbs) which will eventually prove irresistible. A few may manage to stay on the diet for years, but unless you are prepared to stick with it for maybe ten or more years, you will drift back into eating what I consider poison. For some reason my mum was not interested in forcing me to eat the veggies I hated so, and i was able to eat only what I liked- mostly meat, especially hamburger and the fat those at our table would cut from their steaks. Still I had massive struggles abandoning the 'civilised diet'.

I suggest that no non-food be taken home, none allowed in your fridge or pantry (out of sight is hopefully out of mind). Make a request when seated in a restaurant that the bread bin be removed (but please leave the butter), and when ordering, request that the vegetables be removed from the plate in the kitchen (just say you don't like to see 'good food go to waste').

Even during the years I was soundman for Grateful Dead, I stuck to my guns and remained totally carnivorous. I am restricted by the forums rules (as I read them) from telling about my essay on diet and exercise which is posted on my website. Basically it states that humans were totally hunting peoples until the end of the paleolithic age. No paleolithic archeological dig has ever produced any food residues from vegetables. Chemical analysis of bones from the digs indicates they are the same composition as the African lion- thus, virtually no intake of vegetation. There were no 'hunter-gatherer' societies until the neolithic, even though some modern HG tribes still made and used typical paleolithic napped-stone tools. The so called Nearthin and Paleodiet thus are both nonsense, true paleolithic people were total carnivores and ate no veggies whatsoever.

In the relatively short evolutionary period since the consumption of vegetables as food there has not been any real adaptation to such low grade low energy, difficult to digest foods. Because we have no adaptation to digesting or processing vegetables as food, they are all basically very bad for us.

We evolved as an active, group-hunting animal. We have a high natural requirement for physical exercise and cannot live long or be healthy without a lot of it.

I hope my post is of some help to others. Just persist. I show that it IS possible to overcome your dietary socialisation.



#2 zoolander

  • Guest
  • 4,724 posts
  • 55
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 17 July 2008 - 02:36 PM

Posted Image

Edited by zoolander, 17 July 2008 - 02:38 PM.


sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for NUTRITION to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 ajnast4r

  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 147
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 17 July 2008 - 02:40 PM

eat raw meat is stupid.. really really really stupid. modern society has set food sanitation standards for a reason. anyone who eats raw meat is bound to end up with a parasitic infection of some sort.

there is always going to be those people that have extremist ideas about diet and such... but the reality is that statements like "The real human diet is a totally carnivorous one" are completely and utterly BS, and unfounded by anything even resembling science. we know for a fact that fiberous vegetables are imperative for long lifespans, and reduce the incidence of nearly every disease plaguing modern man... the human body has adapted itself to an omnivorous diet, and the idea that humans are completely carnivorous is nothing more than the insane ravings of some weird old man.

Edited by ajnast4r, 17 July 2008 - 02:41 PM.


#4 katzenjammer

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 292 posts
  • 10

Posted 17 July 2008 - 02:45 PM

^^

Zoolander, if you mean that a "raw meat diet" has been discussed on this site before, by all means show me where! I'd like to learn more about this. Thanks.

#5 katzenjammer

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 292 posts
  • 10

Posted 17 July 2008 - 02:53 PM

eat raw meat is stupid.. really really really stupid. modern society has set food sanitation standards for a reason. anyone who eats raw meat is bound to end up with a parasitic infection of some sort.

well, you're probably right if you mean eating your average raw meat from a supermarket.

there is always going to be those people that have extremist ideas about diet and such... but the reality is that statements like "The real human diet is a totally carnivorous one" are completely and utterly BS, and unfounded by anything even resembling science.


So, presumably there is good science proving that the human diet was *not* a carnivorous one? What I've seen is pretty inconclusive either way. However, it just seems laughable that pre-agricultural societies would sit around munching on greens of any kind.

we know for a fact that fiberous vegetables are imperative for long lifespans, and reduce the incidence of nearly every disease plaguing modern man...

yes, but perhaps those diseases plaguing modern man are plaguing modern man in the first place because we are eating what our bodies are not designed to eat. For hundreds and thousands of years before agriculture, how much fruits and veggies did our ancestors eat? I'm not asserting something. I am asking a serious question.

the human body has adapted itself to an omnivorous diet

over merely 10,000 years?

Edited by katzenjammer, 17 July 2008 - 03:35 PM.


#6 edward

  • Guest
  • 1,404 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Southeast USA

Posted 17 July 2008 - 03:20 PM

First: Raw meat is a scary thing to eat... parasites, bacteria, oh my! If you are not convinced go take or audit a Microbiology class. SCARY. You have to cook your meat.

Second: The bacterial and parasitic load of raw meat is very small only in freshly killed healthy animals (why we and other animals are able to eat raw meat with no problem, however there were times when a sick animal was eaten and well that does not bode well for whomever ate it). The stuff in the supermarket is scary, you have to cook it you have no idea how long its been there where its come from etc etc. I rarely even eat Sushi for this same reason

Third: Humans are incredibly adaptive and the preponderance of the evidence says that we ate vegetables and meat.

Fourth: The vegetables that were available for most of our existence were all very low in sugar and other carbohydrates: non starchy vegetables (field greens, leaves, grasses etc.), tree nuts, berries, very small versions of modern fruits. Thus we were either in Ketosis or on the verge of it most of the time but we were constantly eating what vegetables were available its just they didn't provide much in the way of carbs or calories. What they did provide were NUTRIENTS and fiber, both of which we work better with.

Fifth: Before we were humans or even proto-humans we were primates of sorts. Most primates live on vegetables as do many mammals, their DNA is a part of us as well. The natural primate diet is a low-glycemic one with lots of fiber

edit: The raw meat guy has his science very wrong, I wont take the time to pick it apart but he clearly has taken some valid arguments and twisted things.

Edited by edward, 17 July 2008 - 03:22 PM.


#7 Matt

  • Guest
  • 2,862 posts
  • 149
  • Location:United Kingdom
  • NO

Posted 17 July 2008 - 03:26 PM

I remember TheBear. I've read the whole thread before, but right now don't have time to do that again.... but didn't the guy have a blood fasting glucose level of 100mg/dl and have cancer a few times?

Still the fact is that the places where longevity is more prevalent are those cultures who are eating a plant based diet, with little or no meat.

Check out this video


To quote Dan " We've all heard of the Atkins diet but the cultures of longevity basically eat a plant based diet, they almost avoid all meat, or they have very little meat. They also tend to be bean eaters..."

Edited by Matt, 17 July 2008 - 03:37 PM.


#8 katzenjammer

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 292 posts
  • 10

Posted 17 July 2008 - 03:32 PM

First: Raw meat is a scary thing to eat... parasites, bacteria, oh my! If you are not convinced go take or audit a Microbiology class. SCARY. You have to cook your meat.


Thanks for the reply. I normally prepare my (grass fed & local) meat very rare to begin with - the outside cooked, the center just barely warm. As long as I'm not getting sick, presumably the bacteria/parasites are either not effecting me, or just not there, or perhaps even a small amount of heat kills them?

#9 katzenjammer

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 292 posts
  • 10

Posted 17 July 2008 - 03:34 PM

I remember TheBear. I've read the whole thread before, but right now don't have time to do that again.... but didn't the guy have a blood fasting glucose level of 100mg/dl and have cancer a few times?

Still the fact is that the places where longevity is more prevalent are those cultures who are eating a plant based diet, with little or no meat.


He did have cancer. He spent a lot of time around Garcia et al. who smoked like chimneys. But, yeah, the cancer thing should give anyone pause I guess.

#10 Matt

  • Guest
  • 2,862 posts
  • 149
  • Location:United Kingdom
  • NO

Posted 17 July 2008 - 03:51 PM

I remember TheBear. I've read the whole thread before, but right now don't have time to do that again.... but didn't the guy have a blood fasting glucose level of 100mg/dl and have cancer a few times?

Still the fact is that the places where longevity is more prevalent are those cultures who are eating a plant based diet, with little or no meat.


He did have cancer. He spent a lot of time around Garcia et al. who smoked like chimneys. But, yeah, the cancer thing should give anyone pause I guess.


Check out the video I posted above in my edited post.

So I found a post by TheBear here http://forum.lowcarb...p;postcount=316

He said "Once more: My blood glucose level is normal and it has been that way for 47 years. Not 'higher than average'- 100 mg/dl IS normal. If some people nowadays are testing lower, perhaps that is why there is so much depression around- I always feel great- no mood swings and have a very positive outlook on life. I would assume that anything termed 'average' is just that, the midpoint of a range of normalcy. Like the body fat level each person will normally maintain, it is not fixed, but varies over a small range. I have never sought to be or appear 'average'- rather I like to be considered unique, at least in my art and my mentation. Let's just add my rock-stable glucose level to this."

He is on what he describes as almost a zero carb diet, he [if my little brain remembers correctly] said he has zero insulin, and above he states that his 47 year glucose recording of 100mg/dl is completely normal. However there is much evidence to support the fact that this fasting glucose level increases the risk for several diseases. Heart disease, Cancer, eye problems and increased aging. Ask yourself, is TheBear a really good role model to use as evidence to support a meat only diet?

#11 zoolander

  • Guest
  • 4,724 posts
  • 55
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 17 July 2008 - 03:52 PM

don't be too overly concerned by me. Things go in cycles here. Each new enthusiastic member seems to go through the same phases. That's where the broken record comes in. Please don't let my lack of patience bother you ;o)

#12 katzenjammer

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 292 posts
  • 10

Posted 17 July 2008 - 04:05 PM

He is on what he describes as almost a zero carb diet, he [if my little brain remembers correctly] said he has zero insulin, and above he states that his 47 year glucose recording of 100mg/dl is completely normal. However there is much evidence to support the fact that this fasting glucose level increases the risk for several diseases. Heart disease, Cancer, eye problems and increased aging. Ask yourself, is TheBear a really good role model to use as evidence to support a meat only diet?


^^I think you are indeed correct Matt. Thanks for the thoughtful & intelligent response! Very interesting video too. Cheers, ~katz

#13 katzenjammer

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 292 posts
  • 10

Posted 17 July 2008 - 04:07 PM

don't be too overly concerned by me. Things go in cycles here. Each new enthusiastic member seems to go through the same phases. That's where the broken record comes in. Please don't let my lack of patience bother you ;o)


That's okay Zoolander. Having been a longtime member on other sites, I know how annoying it can be to have a newbie coming around asking questions that are, well, just plain stupid. So I can appreciate that. Don't be surprised, however, if I ask a few more while I'm learning though! :~

#14 zoolander

  • Guest
  • 4,724 posts
  • 55
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 17 July 2008 - 04:31 PM

That's cool. Shoot away.

#15 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,058 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 17 July 2008 - 07:19 PM

I have heard/read many times that raw meat contains all the nutrients a human body needs - mainly from "survival types".

Gorillas have a vegetarian diet but Chimpanzees are omnivorous, however chimps do prefer meat (as documented by Jane Goodall). They expend a lot of energy to go after bushpigs and even smaller primates whenever the opportunity arises.

Also, you don't get sick from rare steaks very often because most of the bacteria is on the outside (from handling). Heat up the outside and you kill the bacteria. Hamburgers are a different story - you should cook them all the way through.

#16 Forever21

  • Guest
  • 1,918 posts
  • 122

Posted 18 July 2008 - 02:05 AM

Raw meat - not just for breakfast anymore.

#17 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 18 July 2008 - 02:08 AM

I'd say that we're adapted to eat cooked meat. Why else would we like the smell and taste of those nasty PAHs in campfire smoke? Evolution would want us to avoid infections, but wouldn't be so concerned about carcinogens and AGEs which only kill us when we're old.

#18 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 1,999
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 18 July 2008 - 02:20 AM

I'd say that we're adapted to eat cooked meat. Why else would we like the smell and taste of those nasty PAHs in campfire smoke? Evolution would want us to avoid infections, but wouldn't be so concerned about carcinogens and AGEs which only kill us when we're old.

If liking the taste of something means we're adapted for it, then high fructose corn syrup and fat should be good for us. Dunkin' Donuts, here I come!

#19 krillin

  • Guest
  • 1,516 posts
  • 60
  • Location:USA

Posted 18 July 2008 - 02:58 AM

I'd say that we're adapted to eat cooked meat. Why else would we like the smell and taste of those nasty PAHs in campfire smoke? Evolution would want us to avoid infections, but wouldn't be so concerned about carcinogens and AGEs which only kill us when we're old.

If liking the taste of something means we're adapted for it, then high fructose corn syrup and fat should be good for us. Dunkin' Donuts, here I come!

Fat and sugar were good for us back then. Concentrated calories were a scarce commodity that needed to be scarfed down and stored as fat to avoid starving later on.

What I'm getting at is that we're adapted to live long enough to reproduce and raise children. To live significantly longer is going to require doing something other than copying cavemen.

#20 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 1,999
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 18 July 2008 - 03:43 AM

I'd say that we're adapted to eat cooked meat. Why else would we like the smell and taste of those nasty PAHs in campfire smoke? Evolution would want us to avoid infections, but wouldn't be so concerned about carcinogens and AGEs which only kill us when we're old.

If liking the taste of something means we're adapted for it, then high fructose corn syrup and fat should be good for us. Dunkin' Donuts, here I come!

Fat and sugar were good for us back then. Concentrated calories were a scarce commodity that needed to be scarfed down and stored as fat to avoid starving later on.

What I'm getting at is that we're adapted to live long enough to reproduce and raise children. To live significantly longer is going to require doing something other than copying cavemen.

Yes. Copying cavemen is probably better than sitting on the couch eating Doritos (I will never again be able to eat a Dorito without thinking of Saddam Hussein.) but the optimum lifespan will probably require something yet again. Regardless of what cavemen did with respect to cooking meat, I'll probably continue to have mine cooked, though on the rare side.

#21 PWAIN

  • Guest
  • 1,288 posts
  • 241
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 18 July 2008 - 06:12 AM

What about dried meat?

#22 kismet

  • Guest
  • 2,984 posts
  • 424
  • Location:Austria, Vienna

Posted 20 July 2008 - 05:19 PM

This is the most irrational idea I've ever heard of, it sounds even more crazy than any other fad diet, though, the discussion it has sparked is interesting as always.
Summing up:
Our ancestors were omnivores, most related primates are omnivores, our set of teeth resembles that of omnivores, rather than carnivores IIRC, every study I've ever read of points to vegetables and fruits being healthy, those seem to correlate well with longevity according to epidemiology, etc.
Man you are crazy.  Me likes crazy people, though.

I don't like the idea of copying cavemen (paleo diets), they didn't live very long and were called "primitive" for a reason..

#23 edward

  • Guest
  • 1,404 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Southeast USA

Posted 21 July 2008 - 01:32 AM

This is the most irrational idea I've ever heard of, it sounds even more crazy than any other fad diet, though, the discussion it has sparked is interesting as always.
Summing up:
Our ancestors were omnivores, most related primates are omnivores, our set of teeth resembles that of omnivores, rather than carnivores IIRC, every study I've ever read of points to vegetables and fruits being healthy, those seem to correlate well with longevity according to epidemiology, etc.
Man you are crazy. Me likes crazy people, though.

I don't like the idea of copying cavemen (paleo diets), they didn't live very long and were called "primitive" for a reason..


A true paleo diet obviously within a modern context would have you eat: Meat (cooked!), Nuts, Eggs, Fruit, Vegetables and no packaged foods and would be just about the most healthy diet you could get. If you wanted to you could eat LOTS of Vegetables, Fruit, Nuts and minimize the Eggs and Meat and still be technically paleo. I dont think their is anyone that would argue against such a diet being extremely healthy. (I might do CR later in life when my desire to perform in sports lessens, if I do this will be my diet)

I argue that we are adapted to eat lots of Non Starchy Vegetables and lots of Meat (cooked!)(cage free organic Eggs I feel are a reasonable substitute if you cant get decent meat) with supplemental Nuts and Fruits. With periods of fasting (IF).... In my opinion this too is a very healthy diet especially if the meat is cooked properly, which is why Im so interested in the AGE in food topic. (this is my current diet, I do eat some organic hormone free cheeses, yogurt and kefir, not technically paleo but I feel those not lactose intolerant are adapted to handle these plus all mammals drink milk as infants) I prefer to work with evolution instead of against it.

Edited by edward, 21 July 2008 - 01:33 AM.


#24 kismet

  • Guest
  • 2,984 posts
  • 424
  • Location:Austria, Vienna

Posted 21 July 2008 - 02:14 PM

Sure a diet close to paleo is pretty healthy, but I don't think all grains (e.g.oats and my gut feeling tells me others are also not as bad as they are made out to be) and all dairy is bad - technically such a diet is not paleo anymore. Though, it's probably not any more unhealthy but less restrictive.
"Paleo diet" = fad. Just another name for a healthy diet imho. Paleo man would have consumed anything not to starve. They never got really old so it is very unlikely their diet provides benefits for those seeking longevity. Fitness not longevity is promoted by evolution as far as I understand the issue.

Now, CR(ON), is what I call [R]evolution, a diet that modern man "invented" and it seems to work!

Edited by kismet, 21 July 2008 - 02:15 PM.


#25 porthose

  • Guest
  • 107 posts
  • 1
  • Location:Canberra, Australia

Posted 23 July 2008 - 02:34 AM

This is the most irrational idea I've ever heard of, it sounds even more crazy than any other fad diet, though, the discussion it has sparked is interesting as always.
Summing up:
Our ancestors were omnivores, most related primates are omnivores, our set of teeth resembles that of omnivores, rather than carnivores IIRC, every study I've ever read of points to vegetables and fruits being healthy, those seem to correlate well with longevity according to epidemiology, etc.
Man you are crazy. Me likes crazy people, though.

I don't like the idea of copying cavemen (paleo diets), they didn't live very long and were called "primitive" for a reason..


A true paleo diet obviously within a modern context would have you eat: Meat (cooked!), Nuts, Eggs, Fruit, Vegetables and no packaged foods and would be just about the most healthy diet you could get. If you wanted to you could eat LOTS of Vegetables, Fruit, Nuts and minimize the Eggs and Meat and still be technically paleo. I dont think their is anyone that would argue against such a diet being extremely healthy. (I might do CR later in life when my desire to perform in sports lessens, if I do this will be my diet)

I argue that we are adapted to eat lots of Non Starchy Vegetables and lots of Meat (cooked!)(cage free organic Eggs I feel are a reasonable substitute if you cant get decent meat) with supplemental Nuts and Fruits. With periods of fasting (IF).... In my opinion this too is a very healthy diet especially if the meat is cooked properly, which is why Im so interested in the AGE in food topic. (this is my current diet, I do eat some organic hormone free cheeses, yogurt and kefir, not technically paleo but I feel those not lactose intolerant are adapted to handle these plus all mammals drink milk as infants) I prefer to work with evolution instead of against it.


ive been on the warrior diet in conjuction with the paleo diet for nearly 6 yrs. i certainly DONT over eat at night as Ori Hofmekler suggests but combining the two has been the best thing ive ever done. at 41 feel fit, sharp and fantastic and outlast all the other male salsa dancers on the dance floor. chix love it! :)

#26 edward

  • Guest
  • 1,404 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Southeast USA

Posted 23 July 2008 - 03:26 AM

ive been on the warrior diet in conjuction with the paleo diet for nearly 6 yrs. i certainly DONT over eat at night as Ori Hofmekler suggests but combining the two has been the best thing ive ever done. at 41 feel fit, sharp and fantastic and outlast all the other male salsa dancers on the dance floor. chix love it! :)


Good to hear, check out the ketogenic diet thread (its a little more of a comprehensive thread on the issue minus raw meat that is)
http://www.imminst.o...ets-t20768.html

It really should be named the Ketogenic + Paleo + IF thread as "the diet" being discussed has elements of all of these, you could even CR it if you wanted to.

Edited by edward, 23 July 2008 - 03:26 AM.


#27 b0gger

  • Guest
  • 167 posts
  • 270
  • Location:Russia, Saint-Peters

Posted 30 August 2008 - 02:27 PM

Attached File  26047_193228_576617df701cc3fb881aeff0e62c7e57.jpg   60.96KB   13 downloads
Nenets family enjoy fresh rain deer meat.

#28 caston

  • Guest
  • 2,141 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 30 August 2008 - 02:40 PM

I would love to see what could be done to that in photoshop :|o

#29 VictorBjoerk

  • Member, Life Member
  • 1,763 posts
  • 91
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 30 August 2008 - 02:49 PM

Are there any photos of the bear?

#30 REGIMEN

  • Guest
  • 570 posts
  • -1

Posted 15 September 2008 - 06:40 AM

Attached File  26047_193228_576617df701cc3fb881aeff0e62c7e57.jpg   60.96KB   13 downloads
Nenets family enjoy fresh rain deer meat.


I think the freshness of the butchering and the cold climate kills the bacteria issue. Parasites, though...?

That woman on the right is most likely close to 40 years old... Not too many raw-meat eating supermodels, if ya know what I mean.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users