AAAAAAAAAHHHH SHE'S SO WEAK
weeeeeak
weak, weak, weak.
Edited by bayesianbandit, 03 October 2008 - 01:13 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:13 AM
Edited by bayesianbandit, 03 October 2008 - 01:13 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:18 AM
Edited by bayesianbandit, 03 October 2008 - 01:18 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:18 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:18 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:21 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:22 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:24 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:25 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:26 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:33 AM
Edited by bayesianbandit, 03 October 2008 - 01:33 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:35 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:40 AM
Edited by bayesianbandit, 03 October 2008 - 01:40 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:42 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:45 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:47 AM
Edited by bayesianbandit, 03 October 2008 - 01:48 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:49 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:52 AM
Edited by bayesianbandit, 03 October 2008 - 01:52 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 01:58 AM
Bias showing again...
"You both have sons going to Iraq"...
Palin's son is a soldier. Biden's son is a lawyer.
Of course Palin won't talk about Obama accusing soldiers of "air raiding villages and killing civilians"
Edited by bayesianbandit, 03 October 2008 - 01:59 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 02:00 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 02:04 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 02:08 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 02:55 AM
Edited by Connor MacLeod, 03 October 2008 - 03:01 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 03:00 AM
AAAAAAAAAHHHH SHE'S SO WEAK
weeeeeak
weak, weak, weak.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 03:32 AM
Posted 03 October 2008 - 03:39 AM
Yeah, no train wrecks. I thought that Palin was throwing out a lot of recycled Reagan era "get government off our backs" talking points, yet repeatedly criticised Biden for "looking backward" when he brought up the Bush Administration and how similar McCain's policies are. I wish Ifill would have said "Um, you aren't even remotely answering the question. Let me ask it again." a few times. I really didn't see the moderator bias that "bayesianbandit" (aka Savage) was claiming.I thought they both did fine. This debate was more interesting than the last one in my view, first because there was so much anticipation around it, and second because I think Biden and Palin came across on a more personal level than either McCain or Obama did in the last one. In any case, I suspect this will help McCain/Palin somewhat since I think many people (including some McCain supporters) were expecting to see a train wreck - and it wasn't any where close to being something like that.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 03:43 AM
Edited by Iam Empathy, 03 October 2008 - 03:45 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 03:47 AM
You seem alright...I guess I tolerate you too. That makes 3!Palin is MY Dogma Mama! I (<--very gay) cannot get married to a man, but she TOLERATES me! As does Biden! Hurray!
Posted 03 October 2008 - 03:52 AM
aaaaand i'm back! ok, my posting permissions have been returned after a 24 hour suspension.AAAAAAAAAHHHH SHE'S SO WEAK
weeeeeak
weak, weak, weak.
The friggin' Bayesians are everywhere!!! Can we see a little love for the the frequentists here on imminst? Come on people!
Posted 03 October 2008 - 03:53 AM
She did not just say "Bless their hearts."
Edited by luv2increase, 03 October 2008 - 03:57 AM.
Posted 03 October 2008 - 04:12 AM
I agree. I think Ifill was fair.I really didn't see the moderator bias that "bayesianbandit" (aka Savage) was claiming.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users