• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
* * * - - 5 votes

Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 luv2increase

  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 27 October 2008 - 10:59 PM


Obama Bombshell Audio Uncovered. He wants to Radically Reinterpret the Constitution to Redistribute Wealth!!
In a 2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview
Obama is discussing the best way to bring about a Redistribution of Wealth!!!
This Video Exposes the radical underneath the rhetoric!!!



Here is that interview. This is damning to Obama, especially after his "redistribute the wealth" comment to Joe the Plumber! This just came out today and at perfect timing. This is all over the TV and making headlines even in other countries!









Barack Obama interview reignites fear of socialist agenda
A radio discussion in which Barack Obama lamented past failures to bring about "redistributive change" as one of the "tragedies" of history has reignited fears he plans to introduce socialist-style economic policies.


By Toby Harnden in Pittsburgh
Last Updated: 7:07PM GMT 27 Oct 2008

Excerpts of his comments, made in the context of discussing historical wrongs against blacks, were broadcast on a radio station in 2001 but emerged on the internet.

In the discussion with Chicago Public Radio, Mr Obama, then just 40 and an obscure state senator and university law lecturer, was speaking about the US Supreme Court and noted that its history meant that "I'm not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts".

Although his remarks were heavily analytical and academic, he spoke warmly of the notion of redistributing wealth, suggesting that there were other vehicles that the courts to achieve it.

"One of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organising and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that."

The comments emerged as Mr Obama cast himself as representing "hope over fear" and, in a reference to Abraham Lincoln, "a politics that calls on our better angels instead of encouraging our worst instincts".

With the race for the White House entering the final week of a gruelling 21-month campaign, the Democratic nominee, with a comfortable seven-point lead in national polls, sought to portray his Republican rival John McCain as a clone of President George W. Bush.

"When it comes to the economy ... the plain truth is that John McCain has stood with this president every step of the way," the Illinois senator said. "Voting for the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy that he once opposed. Voting for the Bush budgets that spent us into debt. Calling for less regulation 21 times just this year. Those are the facts."

But what aides called his "closing argument" was potentially undermined by the emergence of the 2001 discussion, which was seized on by John McCain's campaign as proof that the Democratic nominee is a dangerous radical.

Mr Obama's recent comment to a plumber in Ohio that "when you spread the wealth around it's a good thing for everybody" was not an innocent slip, Mr McCain's advisers argued.

Mr McCain, 72, has made Mr Obama's remark to the plumber, Joe Wurzelbacker, the centrepiece of his faltering campaign in its final days, lauding "Joe the Plumber" as the archetypal ordinary American at risk from high taxes designed to divert middle-class wealth to the poor.

Republicans fear that the Democratic party is about to secure one of the ultimate "coalition of powers" by strengthening its grip on both houses of Congress winning the White House.

"Now we know that the slogans 'change you can believe in' and 'change we need' are code words for Barack Obama's ultimate goal: 'redistributive change'," said Doug Holtz-Eakin, Mr McCain's top economics adviser.

"No wonder he wants to appoint judges that legislate from the bench - as insurance in case a unified Democratic government under his control fails to meet his basic goal: taking money away from people who work for it and giving it to people who Barack Obama believes deserve it.

Europeans call it socialism, Americans call it welfare, and Barack Obama calls it change."


http://www.telegraph...-socialism.html




All I have to say is "perfect timing"..... :)

#2 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 27 October 2008 - 11:06 PM

Yeah I also posted this first thing this morning in Savage's Marx II thread. It's been pretty big news all day. One thing you can say about Obummer, he sure is big on redistribution of wealth.

#3 luv2increase

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 27 October 2008 - 11:10 PM

Yeah I also posted this first thing this morning in Savage's Marx II thread. It's been pretty big news all day. One thing you can say about Obummer, he sure is big on redistribution of wealth.



His "change" will cause people to "quit working" and mooch off the government and people who actually work hard for a living! It is like a parent giving a young, non-working child an "allowance". Pitiful!


When people who don't like to be hard workers to make a living realize they can be "well off" by just "not working" and letting the government take care of their "welfare", this country will really go to "sh*t", unfortunately. :)

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 27 October 2008 - 11:17 PM

Yeah I also posted this first thing this morning in Savage's Marx II thread. It's been pretty big news all day. One thing you can say about Obummer, he sure is big on redistribution of wealth.



His "change" will cause people to "quit working" and mooch off the government and people who actually work hard for a living! It is like a parent giving a young, non-working child an "allowance". Pitiful!


When people who don't like to be hard workers to make a living realize they can be "well off" by just "not working" and letting the government take care of their "welfare", this country will really go to "sh*t", unfortunately. :)



Everyone will be poor.

#5 RighteousReason

  • Guest
  • 2,491 posts
  • -103
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 27 October 2008 - 11:20 PM

People have been trying to get the word out about this stuff for months.

Here are a few related threads:

To The Undecided Voter

Spread the wealth around!
Marx II speaks

Barack Obama's anti-Americanism
read this before you vote

Obama's Magic

Which do you prefer?
Bush III or Marx II

Politicians Who Vilify The Wealthy


and many, many, many more!

#6 Iam Empathy

  • Guest
  • 429 posts
  • 1

Posted 27 October 2008 - 11:20 PM

lol, this thread is such a hilarious last-ditch attempt at character assassination. The only play that the Republicans have left in their playbook. :)

#7 david ellis

  • Guest
  • 1,014 posts
  • 79
  • Location:SanDiego
  • NO

Posted 27 October 2008 - 11:21 PM

All I have to say is "perfect timing"..... :)


Weak soup for Republicans. No leaders, no plan, failed ideology, just the John Birchers and other radicals left. Republican congressmen going to jail. Delay and Stevens will have plenty of buddies to play poker with. Too bad Bush didn't do more Town Hall meetings pushing social security reform. Republican popularity would drop every week as more and more people realized the Republican party thinks Social Security is socialism. And the big welfare cuts they want are social security cuts. Spin doesn't work when you get close to the third rail, and people make rational choices.

Really, luv2increase, you think something Obama said years ago plays as strong as the economic and political gigantic disaster that Bush was. Weak soup. Gruel for Republicans. That tape is meat?, its more like noodles. The Democratic ascendancy is powered by the people. The people are making campaign donation records The fat cats missed the boat on donating to Obama. They are left with McCain's leaky, stinking, sinking barge. Good for the people, bad for corporations and their paid footpads-republican politicians.

#8 luv2increase

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 27 October 2008 - 11:21 PM

Everyone will be poor.



Yeah, that is what I meant when I said this country will go to sh*t.



This is serious stuff, and people need to get their heads out of their asses thinking Obama is going to "change" America for the better when every one of his flip-flopped plans will obviously screw America royally. I don't know about you, but I care for my country and my livelihood!

People are sickly falling for Obama's rhetoric and sweet talk and not truly analyzing what the guy says or what his plans for American "really" entail.

#9 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 27 October 2008 - 11:26 PM



http://www.telegraph...-socialism.html


All I have to say is "perfect timing"..... :)



What's interesting about this interview is that it wasn't made news by a journalist. This Youtube was posted by a citizen. A patriot no doubt. This election citizens have to do the job of journalist's.

#10 luv2increase

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 28 October 2008 - 01:11 AM

This election citizens have to do the job of journalist's.



It is because they are too afraid to take it on. It would cause them to get blacklisted by the Obama campaign and probably sure retribution from Obama when and if he became President and started his dictatorship regime.


I think Obama's plan for the economy trumps all other issues. This is a war of the lesser of two evils, and McCain has my vote on that account. Obama's study and love for Marxism, this 2001 radio statement, his socialistic economic plans, and what he said to Joe the Plumber are all tell-tale signs that if he was elected President, America would "change" for the worst moreso than we have ever seen in our nation's history. We the people cannot put someone like this in charge. We would be voting for our own country's demise if we did this.



Out of everything posted on this board against Obama, this is the most damning. Of course, I don't necessarily mean this radio address, but I mean all the socialist tell-tale signs and plans of Obama lumped into one basket should scare any voter with a brain away from the critter. He is as bad as they come.


#11 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 28 October 2008 - 01:34 AM

McCain reignites Obama 'socialist' claim over 2001 interview

Oct 27 03:16 PM US/Eastern

John McCain renewed his bid to paint Barack Obama as a "socialist" Monday, saying remarks made by his rival in a 2001 interview proved he was hellbent on large-scale redistribution of wealth.
In the interview, which surfaced on the Internet over the weekend, Obama discussed the failure of the civil rights movement to achieve "redistributive change" -- comments seized upon by McCain.


"In a radio interview revealed today, he said that one of the quote -- 'tragedies' of the civil rights movement is that it didn't bring about a redistribution of wealth in our society," McCain said.

"That is what change means for Barack the Redistributor: It means taking your money and giving it to someone else," he told a crowd of around 2,000 at a sports hall in this key battleground state.

"He believes in redistributing wealth, not in policies that grow our economy and create jobs. He is more interested in controlling wealth than in creating it, in redistributing money instead of spreading opportunity."

Obama's campaign dismissed McCain's attack as a "fake controversy" by a desperate man, accusing the Republican nominee of twisting Obama's words.

"This is a fake news controversy drummed up by the all too common alliance of Fox News, the Drudge Report and John McCain, who apparently decided to close out his campaign with the same false, desperate attacks that have failed for months," a statement said.

"In this seven-year-old interview, Senator Obama did not say that the courts should get into the business of redistributing wealth at all."

In the interview, Obama, a former law professor, talked about the role of the US Supreme Court and its rulings in relation to wealth redistribution.

"... The Supreme Court never entered into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society," Obama said in the interview on Chicago Public Radio.

"... I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was that the civil rights movement became so court-focused, I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and organizing activities on the ground that are able to bring about the coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that," Obama said.


http://www.breitbart...;show_article=1

Now Obummer's the one trying to twist his own words to mean something else than what he clearly said.

#12 luv2increase

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 28 October 2008 - 01:45 AM

Now Obummer's the one trying to twist his own words to mean something else than what he clearly said.




Ya don't say....




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users