During my research in this forum I've often read that the optimal ratio between EPA and DHA one should go for in a fish oil product is 4:1 because there is evidence to suggest that it is primarily EPA which helps cognitive function and mood elevation. While I understand the reasoning behind emphasizing increased EPA intake I don't quite understand why DHA should be detremental to these benefits. Since fish oil yielding a 4:1 ratio is quite hard to get for a decent price I wondered: Is there really a good reason why supplementing 2000mg EPA and 500mg DHA should be better that taking 2000mg EPA and 1000mg DHA?
EPA/DHA ratio
#1
Posted 31 October 2008 - 09:02 AM
During my research in this forum I've often read that the optimal ratio between EPA and DHA one should go for in a fish oil product is 4:1 because there is evidence to suggest that it is primarily EPA which helps cognitive function and mood elevation. While I understand the reasoning behind emphasizing increased EPA intake I don't quite understand why DHA should be detremental to these benefits. Since fish oil yielding a 4:1 ratio is quite hard to get for a decent price I wondered: Is there really a good reason why supplementing 2000mg EPA and 500mg DHA should be better that taking 2000mg EPA and 1000mg DHA?
#2
Posted 31 October 2008 - 01:12 PM
During my research in this forum I've often read that the optimal ratio between EPA and DHA one should go for in a fish oil product is 4:1 because there is evidence to suggest that it is primarily EPA which helps cognitive function and mood elevation. While I understand the reasoning behind emphasizing increased EPA intake I don't quite understand why DHA should be detremental to these benefits. Since fish oil yielding a 4:1 ratio is quite hard to get for a decent price I wondered: Is there really a good reason why supplementing 2000mg EPA and 500mg DHA should be better that taking 2000mg EPA and 1000mg DHA?
Am I correct in thinking that some research indicates that EPA can be more effective (for memory, learning, concentration and mood) over time, when there is less DHA to compete with it?
#3
Posted 01 November 2008 - 03:48 PM
This is the question that interests me. Is there any evidence to support this hypothesis? How should/could DHA "compete" with EPA?Am I correct in thinking that some research indicates that EPA can be more effective (for memory, learning, concentration and mood) over time, when there is less DHA to compete with it?
#4
Posted 02 November 2008 - 07:11 AM
benefits of supplements with DHA > EPA.
EPA didn't help me much at all.
Not sure if it means anything as far as long term usage goes.
I guess the question should be: What are you trying achieve with Omega3 ?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users