• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

Obama asserts improved science as administration goal


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Lazarus Long

  • Life Member, Guardian
  • 8,116 posts
  • 242
  • Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York

Posted 22 December 2008 - 04:14 PM


The end of faith based policy making is nigh. Well we can hope.

Some of you may object to a renewed to commitment to issues like climate change policy but the areas of concern go much beyond that and include bioscience research into stem cells, genetics, energy physics and cybernetics. If you have the credentials and are looking for a job please check in with the administration since they are definitely hiring.

The big three to start will be in climate science, bioscience and energy physics, but many more areas of scientific inquiry and development are due a renewed commitment from this administration that has been lacking for most of a decade.

A New Respect for Science
Published: December 22, 2008

Though Barack Obama’s cabinet appointments have received the big headlines, it is worth noting two important sub-cabinet choices. Both are scientists, committed to using rather than abusing science to address issues like climate change, and a welcome departure from the many ideologues and lobbyists that Dick Cheney assembled to advise President Bush on environmental matters.

The first of these choices is Jane Lubchenco, a marine biologist at Oregon State University, to run the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, a division of the Commerce Department responsible for the health of the atmosphere and the oceans.

Ms. Lubchenco is an expert on two grave threats to the oceans, both linked to global warming. One is acidification, which is destroying coral reefs, the other hypoxia, a condition that robs fish of the oxygen they need to survive. She has also been a powerful advocate for stronger federal and international efforts to protect declining fish species.

We are also heartened by Mr. Obama’s choice of John Holdren, a Harvard physicist, as his science adviser. Mr. Holdren has served as chairman of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, as has Ms. Lubchenco. Both have argued strongly and repeatedly for a mandatory limit on greenhouse gases to avoid catastrophic climate change.

Like Mr. Obama’s earlier appointments — in particular Steven Chu, a Nobel laureate in physics, to run the Department of Energy — these choices solidly affirm Mr. Obama’s commitment to aggressively address the challenges of energy independence and global warming.

The broader point, though, is what they say about his appreciation for the processes of science. That was not much in evidence in the Bush administration, some of whose appointees edited and suppressed scientific documents to serve the administration’s political agenda.

As Ms. Lubchenco observes, identifying a problem is not synonymous with solving it. But Mr. Obama has at least surrounded himself with serious scholars of some of the most critical issues of our times.



#2 mentatpsi

  • Guest
  • 904 posts
  • 36
  • Location:Philadelphia, USA

Posted 19 January 2009 - 01:09 AM

I don't know if by climate science you refer to energy policies which the government take into effect. But under such goals, companies associated with energy conservation will increase in popularity. "Green Design" & "Eco-Friendly", things of this nature. I read an article in SEED magazine which spoke of a trend to cut Science/R&D spending during recessions, but it's good to hear that the opposite might be true under this president.

I think if anything there is a huge market for more energy-efficient technologies to be produced and researched; ranging from car engines to lighting systems, to those primitive little draft stoppers that people put under doors lol. I think it will revitalize our markets, plus the end result is money conservation.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users