I've just bought from my local store a very cheap Swiss Bilberry 25 mg fruit extract + 75 mg leaves extract and after the fact started to worry about the leaves. Why did they put them in there in such a high amount? I did some quick research on the web and found the interesting 2008 study below. I'll count the bilberry leaves as source of proanthocyanidins - a good enough cheap substitute for the much more expensive pycnogenol.
I'm intrigued about the hydroxycinnamic acid though - will do some more research and I'll be back.
doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.057
Organ-specific distribution of phenolic compounds in bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) and 'northblue' blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum x V. angustifolium)
Kaisu Riihinen Laura Jaakola Sirpa Kärenlampi and Anja Hohtola
Available online 5 February 2008.
Abstract
Blueberries and bilberries are recognized as some of the best sources of flavonoids, especially anthocyanins. The contents of flavonoids (anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, flavonols) and hydroxycinnamic acids in the flower, fruit skin and pulp, leaf and rhizome of bilberry and the blueberry cultivar 'Northblue' were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography combined with diode-array detection. The most striking difference in the fruits was the predominance of hydroxycinnamic acids in blueberry, whereas in bilberry the anthocyanin content was much higher, particularly in the pulp. Differences in flavonoid contents of fruits were already apparent at the flower stage. Bilberry and blueberry leaves both contained high amounts of proanthocyanidins, flavonols and hydroxycinnamic acids. Blueberry rhizomes accumulated high amounts of hydroxycinnamic acids. All plant parts of bilberry and blueberry are potential sources of phenolic compounds for use either as dietary botanicals or by the pharmaceutical industry.