• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

Get killed in the stock market?


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#1 Athanasios

  • Guest
  • 2,616 posts
  • 163
  • Location:Texas

Posted 27 February 2009 - 06:57 PM


I am down about 40% since the recession but am optimistic. Right now there are many stocks trading at or below cash who are profitable and strong companies. I see some 5 to 10 baggers out there and am planning to make a lot of cash on the way up.

I run into a lot of people who are down 50% or so and are just holding instead of making the most of this opportunity. Look for something down 70 to 80% that has low debt, high cash per share, and good long- term prospects and you will make a bundle.

A few that I have moved into:
CBI, KHD, ISRG, NTE

I have cost averaged on DOW

And there are many others to look at like:
HNR, USL, etc.

I just wanted to add this since we had some stock discussion in the past. Now is the time to be greedy for big returns in solid companies. Do your own DD as always.

#2 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,058 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 27 February 2009 - 11:51 PM

I starting buying after the first 2,000 point drop in the DOW in early 2008 and have been dollar cost averaging and almost day-trading at times since then. I made about 20 trades that netted a few hundred dollars and I am still holding 7 stocks that are 50% down - including ISRG. I think I will be dollar costing that one soon.

Really have to be super selective right now. I agree with most, that there is still some downside risk, another couple hundred on the DOW over the next couple of months. What I am trying to plan now is how to play the inevitable inflation coming soon (a month?, 6 months?). I suppose some commodity stocks would work in an inflation play. Companies with a lot of cash might actually not do well, depending on the amount of inflation. I was thinking of buying some metals or food commodities. Even though I am a novice investor, I know I do not want to hold on to my cash during an inflationary period.

#3 Athanasios

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,616 posts
  • 163
  • Location:Texas

Posted 28 February 2009 - 01:17 AM

I am betting that inflation will be low til next year and that we will have plenty of warning signs. You are right about being cautious about cash. My main reason looking for cash reserves and low debt is to ensure these beaten down stocks do not have to access the credit market soon. Right now I am heavy into some of the construction and engineering firms that have gotten killed despite good backlog and management that can cherry-pick opportunities. I too have been looking at oil and metals but am thinking that I will cycle into these a bit later. Hopefully I dont miss too much but, as for oil, I am betting that OPEC cant get its act together and enforce the quotas and mandates...at least near-term. I am looking at HNR and USL as oil plays when I do look to jump in. Do you have ideas on metal plays?

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 cathological

  • Guest
  • 112 posts
  • -29

Posted 28 February 2009 - 01:24 AM

I think the stock market is going to keep going down... or plummet. I suppose if you had good timing you could make money off a dead cat bounce here and there. But I'd hold off on buying stocks if I were you.

#5 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 28 February 2009 - 02:13 AM

I think the stock market is going to keep going down... or plummet. I suppose if you had good timing you could make money off a dead cat bounce here and there. But I'd hold off on buying stocks if I were you.

It has got to start going back up at some point. Now, whether that point will be in 2 months, 6 months, a couple years, or longer, is anyone's guess. Just like any bubble bursting, this is only a temporary state. If I had any money, I'd start buying in about now since the prices are getting so enticing.

#6 thefirstimmortal

  • Life Member The First Immortal
  • 6,912 posts
  • 31

Posted 28 February 2009 - 06:41 AM

I think the stock market is going to keep going down... or plummet. I suppose if you had good timing you could make money off a dead cat bounce here and there. But I'd hold off on buying stocks if I were you.

The old don't try to catch a falling knife advise. It is sound advice too, and there is likely to be more downside to this market. It is rare that anyone catches the exact bottom so it is usually best to wait until the market starts trending up. It is unlikely that it will trend up soon.

#7 Zenob

  • Guest, F@H
  • 328 posts
  • 1

Posted 28 February 2009 - 06:49 AM

I think the stock market is going to keep going down... or plummet. I suppose if you had good timing you could make money off a dead cat bounce here and there. But I'd hold off on buying stocks if I were you.

It has got to start going back up at some point. Now, whether that point will be in 2 months, 6 months, a couple years, or longer, is anyone's guess. Just like any bubble bursting, this is only a temporary state. If I had any money, I'd start buying in about now since the prices are getting so enticing.


The SPX violated it's low at 741. That opens it up for a drop to the 630-640 range. Ultimately before the market can start to make any kind of meaningful recovery we will have to visit those low 600s(or possibly even lower). We could see a bounce up to the 850-900 range before we do but it's looking less and less likely. There is still a massive amount of junk assets that have to be flushed out of the system and a real value(of basically zero) assigned to them. This is why all the banks and their apologists on tv are always bad mouthing "mark to market". They all know that they have huge amounts of assets on their books that are essentially worthless and under no circumstances do they want these junk assets marked to their proper values. If these assets were valued correctly, most financial insitutues would be insolvent. So far pretty much everyone has underestimated the severity of this thing. Don't be one of them.

Here's a few things to try and keep people from getting torn bloody.

This is a severe recession boarding on a depression. If you try to "average in" on the way down with this thing you are going to get torn to shreds. The talking heads on all the financial networks were talking about how "depressed" prices were last year and how they were once in a lifetime buying ops. If you had bought any of their picks at that point you would now be down +90% of your initial investment(most of them were plugging financials then).

Cash is a position. Don't be afraid to be all in cash. You are better off just selling and going to cash then trying to trade a violent market like this without the proper skills to do it safely. It's vastly better to earn 0% on your money then lose +50% of it by buying falling knives and just hoping for a turn around. Capital preservation trumps earnings return.

Don't get confused by the numbers. If you've lost 50% of your investment, you have to make a 100% gain on the capital you have left JUST TO BREAK EVEN. As I said, if you are getting smoked, zero returns on cash is better then losing your capital.

Gold is possibly a good trade going foward but right now it's correcting. It went up and put in a double top and it's pulling back right now. It has a nice well defined upwards trend channel. I'd be looking to get in on a succesful test of the bottom of that channel. However, if we do have a "crash" or just severe selling, gold won't save you. When panic is in the air, EVERYTHING get's tossed overboard, that would include gold.


I attached a picture to show you how severe this is. It shows the SPX for the past 20 years. We have already blown past the bottom of the dot com crash. Today we also violated that 741 low we had back in Nov(not good). Look at this chart and tell me where you see any kind of support below there. It's basically empty air till you get to 600, and there's not much support there to speak of. You can also see how severe this is by how fast it's sold off. The dot com crash took 3 years to get to a bottom. We've already past that point in just ONE year.

Attached Files



#8 lunarsolarpower

  • Guest
  • 1,323 posts
  • 53
  • Location:BC, Canada

Posted 28 February 2009 - 08:13 AM

I'm down maybe 10% since July '08 thanks to an ill-timed momentum play on UNG but my core GLD seems to be withstanding the chaos pretty well. Just like anything these days it's quite volatile so don't buy a top :) Over the next few years of uncertainty it (or at least the underlying asset in case the rumors that it's just a derivative instrument are true) should continue to store value. I wish they'd avoid trying to prevent the rapid return of real estate values to realistic levels so that catastrophe could play out and be done.

http://money.cnn.com...osses_continue/

#9 Mixter

  • Guest
  • 788 posts
  • 98
  • Location:Europe

Posted 28 February 2009 - 11:13 AM

The only definite thing to invest in I can think of would be:
Small to midsize agricultural companies in asia/stable emerging markets
or any water purification companies in asia/stable emerging markets
& with inner value well beyond the stock price

The next question is if this combo really still exists :)

But really, just stay away from stocks. All big companies can break apart, all small and midsize companies, even valuable ones, can slide into bankruptcy right now, because their next bank loan won't be granted.

I lost 0%, got rid of anything remotely like stocks in late 2007 and try to buy supplies and non-luxury assets I need for real life anyhow, ideally with little value loss over time. I did some investing with small sums during the 2000 crash, and gained something here, lost something there, ended up with maybe 5% loss.
Speculating is like lottery for rich people, only real investment by banks and investors is a significant long-term value to the market and thus can lead to significant average gains. It starts with several tens of thousans of $ into one hand-picked company. Funds are somehow in between.

Edited by mixter, 28 February 2009 - 11:17 AM.


#10 Athanasios

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,616 posts
  • 163
  • Location:Texas

Posted 28 February 2009 - 03:37 PM

Yep, this is exactly why I reallocated now. Everyone is saying the world is going to end.

One stock I am in I bought at about half their cash value even though they are still profitable and have an impressive track record. Another that I bought was down 80%, share price of 7, earned .77 in Q4 and forecast conservative earnings for 09 of $2. The day they announced those results they dropped 30%. I bought a truck-load.

Companies have a value that is not linked to their stock price. Yes, be careful of what they value their assets for if you are going to calculate that in..

I dont mind catching a falling knife if it means I bought $2 for my 1.

I think the rich see this as an opportunity to buy half the world on the cheap. I also think that those too scared to look at stocks at all right now are going to be the ones who get screwed the most, unfortunately on the way down and up.

My .02, good luck all.

Edit: After thinking about it a bit more, I realize that a stock price is a mix of people's ideas on a companies long term value and the stocks near term value. My assertion is that too many are betting on the near term side of things making a huge opportunity for longer term bets. I think this is especially true considering the track record of people predicting markets over the short term.

Edited by cnorwood, 28 February 2009 - 05:18 PM.


#11 Cassox

  • Guest, F@H
  • 62 posts
  • 1

Posted 28 February 2009 - 05:29 PM

Another idea is to bulk up on dividend paying stock. PFI, AAV, and quite a few other dividend bearing stocks are low low. Its nice to think that I can buy 100 shares of stock at such a low price, that I am payed 90% of the purchase value regardless of where the price goes.

#12 Brainbox

  • Member
  • 2,860 posts
  • 743
  • Location:Netherlands
  • NO

Posted 28 February 2009 - 08:28 PM

It has got to start going back up at some point. Now, whether that point will be in 2 months, 6 months, a couple years, or longer, is anyone's guess. Just like any bubble bursting, this is only a temporary state. If I had any money, I'd start buying in about now since the prices are getting so enticing.

It has to go up at one point in time. The question is when but I'm almost sure it is not now. The background of the decline of stocks is a lot more complicated and fundamental as compared with any recent crisis I'm aware of. If creating bad banks and spending lots of tax money on dead cadaver industries is the only thing economist can think of, I'm afraid it will last for some time. Its not only of economic nature, but the political component due to human tragedy as a result of unemployment is huge, resulting in compromises regarding the way our tax money is being used.

On the other hand, if all private stock investors would start being optimistic and invest all their capital back into structural healthy stocks, who knows what positive outcome could be generated. Maybe that's a reasonable scenario given the circumstances. The question is how to organise such an initiative.
What about a government insured investment plan for private investigators? Instead of throwing tax money into black holes with huge event horizons that assure that nobody can see nor understand whether this investment will ever generate a reasonable economic or social leverage.

#13 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 01 March 2009 - 01:09 AM

Yep, this is exactly why I reallocated now. Everyone is saying the world is going to end.

One stock I am in I bought at about half their cash value even though they are still profitable and have an impressive track record. Another that I bought was down 80%, share price of 7, earned .77 in Q4 and forecast conservative earnings for 09 of $2. The day they announced those results they dropped 30%. I bought a truck-load.

Companies have a value that is not linked to their stock price. Yes, be careful of what they value their assets for if you are going to calculate that in..

I dont mind catching a falling knife if it means I bought $2 for my 1.

I think the rich see this as an opportunity to buy half the world on the cheap. I also think that those too scared to look at stocks at all right now are going to be the ones who get screwed the most, unfortunately on the way down and up.

My .02, good luck all.

Edit: After thinking about it a bit more, I realize that a stock price is a mix of people's ideas on a companies long term value and the stocks near term value. My assertion is that too many are betting on the near term side of things making a huge opportunity for longer term bets. I think this is especially true considering the track record of people predicting markets over the short term.


I tend to agree with your overall assessment. If you always go with the "common" wisdom (what the stock market is a good measure of), then you will not make the kinds of massive gains that some will. I suppose it all depends on someone's level of risk that they decide on. (Although I personally don't think it is that risky to buy now that the prices have fallen so far; The only variable is how long it will take to see the gains, but as long as it is not a short term investment it seems decidedly unrisky to me.)

#14 thefirstimmortal

  • Life Member The First Immortal
  • 6,912 posts
  • 31

Posted 01 March 2009 - 03:19 AM

I dont mind catching a falling knife if it means I bought $2 for my 1.

I think the rich see this as an opportunity to buy half the world on the cheap. I also think that those too scared to look at stocks at all right now are going to be the ones who get screwed the most, unfortunately on the way down and up.

My .02, good luck all.

Edit: After thinking about it a bit more, I realize that a stock price is a mix of people's ideas on a companies long term value and the stocks near term value. My assertion is that too many are betting on the near term side of things making a huge opportunity for longer term bets. I think this is especially true considering the track record of people predicting markets over the short term.


If your looking for ten-baggers, waiting for a better price would be helpful. Fortunately for you your youth is going to be a big help. You made a good deal, if the market continues to fall you will be able to make great deals.

#15 Athanasios

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,616 posts
  • 163
  • Location:Texas

Posted 01 March 2009 - 03:22 PM

If your looking for ten-baggers, waiting for a better price would be helpful. Fortunately for you your youth is going to be a big help. You made a good deal, if the market continues to fall you will be able to make great deals.


One of the interesting things about the chart above is the best deals I found after the 2000 crash were in 2001, in which I made 300% in my portfolio that year. I am thinking it may be similar this time around. All boats lowered with the waterline but at this point bargain hunters are starting to prop up stocks that deserve it. I am sure the overall market has some more to correct but I think it will be much more selective. Hedge Funds are close to having dumped what they were forced to sell.

Trying to time the bottoms has its merits and those who are savvy might want to try, but I doubt the average joe that also has a day job will have much of a chance. I might hedge a little with some options for the short term on my most vulnerable stocks, but I doubt my ability to time the last 20% of the dip.

#16 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,058 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 01 March 2009 - 03:29 PM

Like Brainbox, I am very pessimistic about the government interventions (wheee! let us print and spend money in the trillions) and I think they will hurt over the long term leading to a long drawn-out recession (there will be a couple of bounces, but not a recovery, in my view), but that doesn't mean that all stocks will be down, as cnorwood points out. I tend to think a few biotech and energy companies will do well.

#17 DJS

  • Guest
  • 5,798 posts
  • 11
  • Location:Taipei
  • NO

Posted 01 March 2009 - 05:43 PM

I tend to agree with your overall assessment. If you always go with the "common" wisdom (what the stock market is a good measure of), then you will not make the kinds of massive gains that some will. I suppose it all depends on someone's level of risk that they decide on. (Although I personally don't think it is that risky to buy now that the prices have fallen so far; The only variable is how long it will take to see the gains, but as long as it is not a short term investment it seems decidedly unrisky to me.)


If you're talking about investing in an index fund then I agree with you. Betting on ponies way exceeds my risk tolerance (and financial knowledge level) at this point. :)

#18 DJS

  • Guest
  • 5,798 posts
  • 11
  • Location:Taipei
  • NO

Posted 02 March 2009 - 06:04 PM

It's looking like another ugly day on wall st.

Dow Below 7,000 for the First Time Since 1997

#19 platypus

  • Guest
  • 2,386 posts
  • 240
  • Location:Italy

Posted 02 March 2009 - 06:54 PM

Yes, it's definetely not looking good...I'm a bit afraid to dip in the market as this could well be the start of a secular bear market or another "lost decade". :(

#20 cathological

  • Guest
  • 112 posts
  • -29

Posted 02 March 2009 - 11:44 PM

I hear Smith and Wesson is doing quite well.

#21 PWAIN

  • Guest
  • 1,288 posts
  • 241
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 03 March 2009 - 12:54 AM

During the Great Depression, I think stock fell by 89% so if the same thing happens again, we can expect the Dow to fall below 2000, even as low as about 1600. It then took ages to go up again (25 years to get back to it's previous high). So if depression, wait until it at least crasks the 2000 mark and then get ready for a long wait.

Mind,
If all government intervention odes is to avoid a depression and replace it with 2 or 3 recessions 5 years apart, it would be worth it. think of it like this, hold your breath for 10 minutes or for 3 minutes 20 seconds 3 times 10 minutes apart. Which do you prefer? it is the difference between complete wipe out once (lose job, home, family etc etc) and just hard times several times(cut back, half pay packet etc etc).

#22 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 03 March 2009 - 02:46 AM

During the Great Depression, I think stock fell by 89% so if the same thing happens again, we can expect the Dow to fall below 2000, even as low as about 1600. It then took ages to go up again (25 years to get back to it's previous high). So if depression, wait until it at least crasks the 2000 mark and then get ready for a long wait.

This is a good argument against a buy and hold strategy, particularly one that owns the market (in the form of index funds rather than individual stocks). Whether in the early 30's or today or sometime soon, buying healthy companies at cheap prices can still make you a lot of money. There were a couple of great years for the market in the early 30's. People who bought at the top were still screwed, but people who played it right made a lot of money.

#23 DJS

  • Guest
  • 5,798 posts
  • 11
  • Location:Taipei
  • NO

Posted 03 March 2009 - 03:36 AM

During the Great Depression, I think stock fell by 89% so if the same thing happens again, we can expect the Dow to fall below 2000, even as low as about 1600. It then took ages to go up again (25 years to get back to it's previous high). So if depression, wait until it at least crasks the 2000 mark and then get ready for a long wait.

This is a good argument against a buy and hold strategy, particularly one that owns the market (in the form of index funds rather than individual stocks). Whether in the early 30's or today or sometime soon, buying healthy companies at cheap prices can still make you a lot of money. There were a couple of great years for the market in the early 30's. People who bought at the top were still screwed, but people who played it right made a lot of money.


My logic is fairly simple. If you buy into an index fund now at 6800, even if the Dow drops to 4000 (which I think is highly unlikely), the chances are still overwhelmingly in favor of the markets rebounding for in nice profit at some point in the next ten years.

Sticking your money in an index fund right about now amounts to saying, "I think things could get even worse than they are now, but I don't think this is the end of civilization as we know it."

#24 DJS

  • Guest
  • 5,798 posts
  • 11
  • Location:Taipei
  • NO

Posted 03 March 2009 - 03:43 AM

This is a good argument against a buy and hold strategy, particularly one that owns the market (in the form of index funds rather than individual stocks).


It's a good argument only if you accept the initial proposition that the Dow could fall below 2000 and never recover! ;)

Edited by N0NZER0, 03 March 2009 - 03:45 AM.


#25 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 03 March 2009 - 04:21 AM

This is a good argument against a buy and hold strategy, particularly one that owns the market (in the form of index funds rather than individual stocks).

It's a good argument only if you accept the initial proposition that the Dow could fall below 2000 and never recover! ;)

Well, it's a pretty good argument if you ride the market all the way down from 14000 to 2000 and it takes a quarter century to come back. I don't think either of those things will happen though. But then, if I could predict the future, I'd have more money to play with right now.

#26 forever freedom

  • Guest
  • 2,362 posts
  • 67

Posted 03 March 2009 - 04:56 AM

This monday was ugly indeed. It`s amazing that we keep finding new dirt under the carpet. Buying and holding long term is still a great strategy, though. The market can`t keep falling forever and i don`t think it will fall much further, although i wouldn`t have guessed that it would go this low.

#27 lunarsolarpower

  • Guest
  • 1,323 posts
  • 53
  • Location:BC, Canada

Posted 03 March 2009 - 07:04 AM

This monday was ugly indeed. It`s amazing that we keep finding new dirt under the carpet. Buying and holding long term is still a great strategy, though. The market can`t keep falling forever and i don`t think it will fall much further, although i wouldn`t have guessed that it would go this low.


Really?

This isn't exactly something that came about overnight.

I really think there's a good long way to go for this economy based on the fact that nothing fundamental is being done about the state of affairs. Pouring borrowed/printed money into smoking carcasses of the derivative trade might keep things rolling for another day but the mountain of derivatives only gets spun larger and more entangled at every step. Transparency is beyond possible for these things which means that no market can fairly price the entities that are a party to them.

Here's a more recent piece:
http://www.vancouver...9152/story.html

#28 JLL

  • Guest
  • 2,192 posts
  • 161

Posted 03 March 2009 - 08:40 AM

During the Great Depression, I think stock fell by 89% so if the same thing happens again, we can expect the Dow to fall below 2000, even as low as about 1600. It then took ages to go up again (25 years to get back to it's previous high). So if depression, wait until it at least crasks the 2000 mark and then get ready for a long wait.

This is a good argument against a buy and hold strategy, particularly one that owns the market (in the form of index funds rather than individual stocks). Whether in the early 30's or today or sometime soon, buying healthy companies at cheap prices can still make you a lot of money. There were a couple of great years for the market in the early 30's. People who bought at the top were still screwed, but people who played it right made a lot of money.


My logic is fairly simple. If you buy into an index fund now at 6800, even if the Dow drops to 4000 (which I think is highly unlikely), the chances are still overwhelmingly in favor of the markets rebounding for in nice profit at some point in the next ten years.

Sticking your money in an index fund right about now amounts to saying, "I think things could get even worse than they are now, but I don't think this is the end of civilization as we know it."


Remember that rebounding is not enough when inflation is high, as it probably will be.

#29 platypus

  • Guest
  • 2,386 posts
  • 240
  • Location:Italy

Posted 03 March 2009 - 11:04 AM

In the case B&H seems too risky and markets trade without a clear direction for years, one might want to try a different strategy:

http://marketsci.wor...ly-seasonality/

#30 Athanasios

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,616 posts
  • 163
  • Location:Texas

Posted 23 April 2009 - 06:32 PM

Well, I was down 50% from where I started before the market downturn. After buying up the best companies I could find that were down at least 80%, I am now up 30% from where my portfolio was precrash.

Given this, I decided to take out 40% of my current total portfolio and sit it on the sideline until September where I will consider putting some of it back in.

What do you all think, are we stabalizing or setting up for the next downturn in stock prices?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users