How much Vitamin D do you supplement and why?
#151
Posted 24 August 2010 - 01:54 AM
#152
Posted 24 August 2010 - 05:22 PM
Now, in a study whose funders include the Medical Research Council (MRC), the MS Society, the Wellcome Trust and the MS Society of Canada, researchers at the University of Oxford have shown the extent to which vitamin D interacts with our DNA. They used new DNA sequencing technology to create a map of vitamin D receptor binding across the genome. The vitamin D receptor is a protein activated by vitamin D, which attaches itself to DNA and thus influences what proteins are made from our genetic code.
The researchers found 2,776 binding sites for the vitamin D receptor along the length of the genome. These were unusually concentrated near a number of genes associated with susceptibility to autoimmune conditions such as MS, Crohn's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (or 'lupus') and rheumatoid arthritis, and to cancers such as chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and colorectal cancer.
They also showed that vitamin D had a significant effect on the activity of 229 genes including IRF8, previously associated with MS, and PTPN2, associated with Crohn's disease and type 1 diabetes.
Just chalking another one up for Vit. D
#153
Posted 24 August 2010 - 11:00 PM
Vitamin D, nervous system and aging
http://www.kalueffla...009Touhimma.pdf
Hormonal forms of vitamin D3 appear to control basic
mechanisms of aging and related diseases, and determining
the optimal serum concentration of calcidiol is an important
question for preventive medicine. A new model of
aging is presented here (Fig. 2), in which both too high
and too low activity of calcipherol hormone activity seems
to enhance aging, whereas optimal concentrations appear
to delay aging.
Interesting.
#154
Posted 24 November 2010 - 11:30 PM
I take it in the form of D drops. One drop of the back of a spoon that you lick off. You can't taste anything. I only recently started so I will keep you posted wether I see any solid evidence that its doing anything for me.
#155
Posted 26 November 2010 - 02:30 PM
The body can choose not to absorb vitamin D from the sun, if the deposits are full right? So to determine the correct dosage, one would stay in the sun getting as much exposure as possible, without getting a sunburn, for a month or so. You would then get your vitamin D levels measured and that level would be what you'll be aiming for with a supplement.
Basically, whatever sticks from the sun is the correct dosage.
#156
Posted 27 November 2010 - 07:05 AM
#157
Posted 27 November 2010 - 02:13 PM
Excuse me if I'm being overly simplistic here, but couldn't the correct dosage of vitamin D be determined by sun bathing. Stay with me here.
The body can choose not to absorb vitamin D from the sun, if the deposits are full right? So to determine the correct dosage, one would stay in the sun getting as much exposure as possible, without getting a sunburn, for a month or so. You would then get your vitamin D levels measured and that level would be what you'll be aiming for with a supplement.
Basically, whatever sticks from the sun is the correct dosage.
I don't think the body has any regulation on whether it makes Vitamin D from UVB. It just does it and keeps doing it while you are in the sun. I don't think you would overdose on D because the darker you are the less D you make from the sun. And even if you are pale you wouldn't be able to stay in the sun long enough to overdose on D before you burn.
#158
Posted 27 November 2010 - 08:44 PM
I don't think the body has any regulation on whether it makes Vitamin D from UVB. It just does it and keeps doing it while you are in the sun. I don't think you would overdose on D because the darker you are the less D you make from the sun. And even if you are pale you wouldn't be able to stay in the sun long enough to overdose on D before you burn.
I can't remember where I read that, but I guess it makes sense that this was what the author meant.
#159
Posted 30 November 2010 - 04:17 PM
Vitamin D, nervous system and aging
http://www.kalueffla...009Touhimma.pdf
Hormonal forms of vitamin D3 appear to control basic
mechanisms of aging and related diseases, and determining
the optimal serum concentration of calcidiol is an important
question for preventive medicine. A new model of
aging is presented here (Fig. 2), in which both too high
and too low activity of calcipherol hormone activity seems
to enhance aging, whereas optimal concentrations appear
to delay aging.
Interesting.
The Finnish study you linked to is interesting. The study shows an optimal range of 16/24ng/mL. 24 ng/mL is one half the 49 ng/mL frequently previously recommended in Imminst Vitamin D posts. Also, it is less than LabCorp's low reference number of 32 ng/mL.
Today, in today's newspaper, there are warnings to not take too much Vitamin D. A recent Canadian/US study warns of the dangers of taking too much Vitamin D.
#160
Posted 03 December 2010 - 04:21 PM
Part 1:
http://www.youtube.c...u/4/eDO9A6sN7JU
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.c...u/3/VOdfN0gIXcI
Part 3:
http://www.youtube.c...u/2/T0Uc2U3JLAU
Part 4:
http://www.youtube.c...u/1/4wFYAIOiHEE
Part 5:
http://www.youtube.c...u/0/cOP-OAjA3pU
#161
Posted 08 December 2010 - 10:01 PM
Vitamin D, nervous system and aging
http://www.kalueffla...009Touhimma.pdf
Hormonal forms of vitamin D3 appear to control basic
mechanisms of aging and related diseases, and determining
the optimal serum concentration of calcidiol is an important
question for preventive medicine. A new model of
aging is presented here (Fig. 2), in which both too high
and too low activity of calcipherol hormone activity seems
to enhance aging, whereas optimal concentrations appear
to delay aging.
Interesting.
The Finnish study you linked to is interesting. The study shows an optimal range of 16/24ng/mL. 24 ng/mL is one half the 49 ng/mL frequently previously recommended in Imminst Vitamin D posts. Also, it is less than LabCorp's low reference number of 32 ng/mL.
Today, in today's newspaper, there are warnings to not take too much Vitamin D. A recent Canadian/US study warns of the dangers of taking too much Vitamin D.
Here's another one that came up today on Science Daily: http://www.scienceda...01208083047.htm
Compare's Vitamin D levels in older women to frailty. Claims the sweet spot is between 20.0 and 29.9 ng/ml
A recent study accepted for publication in The Endocrine Society's Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (JCEM) found that lower and higher vitamin D levels were associated with an increased likelihood of frailty in older women. Women with vitamin D levels between 20.0 and 29.9 ng/ml were at the lowest risk of frailty.
It's good that we're now getting some research providing info on the ceiling of beneficial Vit D levels.
#162
Posted 15 December 2010 - 10:02 AM
#163
Posted 15 December 2010 - 07:01 PM
Thanks. I am not a big fan of his articles, but these interviews were good.Institute of Medicine Vitamin D Rebuttal - Joseph Mercola talks to Dr. John Cannell and Carole Baggerly.
#164 Guest_Eidnoga_*
Posted 20 February 2011 - 02:30 AM
216 nM/L (I live in Canada). John Cannell of the Vitamin D Council says optimal levels are 135-200 nM/L.
back in canada eh?
what does nm/l convert to in ng/dl?
I had my levels tested a of weeks ago and was at 39. I was taking 2000 iu's and spending a lot of time outside all summer and that's all the higher it got. Now that winter is descending upon the upper midwest and the Sun is all but gone I'm up to 5000 iu's.
FWIW my Doctor said I should aim for 50ng/dl.
I've noticed that some measurements are in ng/ml, while others are in ng/dl. There is this difference even in published books and articles where Vitamin D supplementation is mentioned. What's up with that? 100 ml = 1 dl. That's a big difference, and the authors are usually saying to aim for serum levels of around "50 ng/ml" or "50 ng/dl," which obviously are very different.
Edited by Eidnoga, 20 February 2011 - 02:30 AM.
#165
Posted 01 March 2011 - 01:00 AM
I searched a bit and I didn't find this posted. If it was, sorry.
Vitamin D and mucosal immune function.
Sun J.
Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA. jun_sun@urmc.rochester.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Significant advances have been made in the characterization of Vitamin D and the Vitamin D receptor (VDR) in immune function. The studies of signaling pathways involved in the response to infection and inflammation have led to a more detailed understanding of the cellular response to Vitamin D through VDR. This review summarizes recent progress in understanding how Vitamin D contributes to mucosal immune function, particularly in relation to the molecular mechanisms by which Vitamin D and VDR influence mucosal immunity, bacterial infection, and inflammation.
RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, it was shown that Vitamin D modulates the T cell antigen receptor, further demonstrating that Vitamin D has a nonclassical role in immunoregulation. The anti-inflammation and anti-infection functions for Vitamin D are newly identified and highly significant activities. Vitamin D/VDR have multiple critical functions in regulating the response to intestinal homeostasis, tight junctions, pathogen invasion, commensal bacterial colonization, antimicrobe peptide secretion, and mucosal defense. Interestingly, microorganisms modulate the VDR signaling pathway.
SUMMARY: Vitamin D is known as a key player in calcium homeostasis and electrolyte and blood pressure regulation. Recently, important progress has been made in understanding how the noncanonical activities of Vitamin D influence the pathogenesis and prevention of human disease. Vitamin D and VDR are directly involved in T cell antigen receptor signaling. The involvement of Vitamin D/VDR in anti-inflammation and anti-infection represents a newly identified and highly significant activity for VDR. Studies have indicated that the dysregulation of VDR may lead to exaggerated inflammatory responses, raising the possibility that defects in Vitamin D and VDR signaling transduction may be linked to bacterial infection and chronic inflammation. Further characterization of Vitamin D/VDR will help elucidate the pathogenesis of various human diseases and in the design of new approaches for prevention and treatment.
Edited by Alec, 01 March 2011 - 01:03 AM.
#166
Posted 01 March 2011 - 01:12 AM
#168
Posted 27 April 2011 - 08:54 PM
J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Mar;26(3):455-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.328.
Why the IOM recommendations for vitamin D are deficient.
Heaney RP, Holick MF.
#169
Posted 29 April 2011 - 11:06 PM
PS I don't get much sunlight, as I work night shift and sleep during the day.
#170
Posted 01 May 2011 - 06:28 AM
My recent vitamin d test showed that had a vitamin d level of 35.8 ng/ml. I currently take 2000ius per day. I was curious as to how much I should take to get to the optimum levels of 50-65 ng/ml?
PS I don't get much sunlight, as I work night shift and sleep during the day.
I'm in exactly the same boat working nights and sleeping during the day.
How long have you been taking 2000iu per day to get a vitamin d level of 35.8 ng/ml?
I've been taking 2000iu of oil based Vitamin d3 for 5 weeks but havnt had any tests done.
#171
Posted 01 May 2011 - 06:53 AM
My recent vitamin d test showed that had a vitamin d level of 35.8 ng/ml. I currently take 2000ius per day. I was curious as to how much I should take to get to the optimum levels of 50-65 ng/ml?
PS I don't get much sunlight, as I work night shift and sleep during the day.
I'm in exactly the same boat working nights and sleeping during the day.
How long have you been taking 2000iu per day to get a vitamin d level of 35.8 ng/ml?
I've been taking 2000iu of oil based Vitamin d3 for 5 weeks but havnt had any tests done.
I've been taking 2000iu daily for about a year. I'm thinking about bumping up to 4000iu oil based and maybe retesting a little down the road.
#172
Posted 02 May 2011 - 07:00 AM
My recent vitamin d test showed that had a vitamin d level of 35.8 ng/ml. I currently take 2000ius per day. I was curious as to how much I should take to get to the optimum levels of 50-65 ng/ml?
PS I don't get much sunlight, as I work night shift and sleep during the day.
I'm in exactly the same boat working nights and sleeping during the day.
How long have you been taking 2000iu per day to get a vitamin d level of 35.8 ng/ml?
I've been taking 2000iu of oil based Vitamin d3 for 5 weeks but havnt had any tests done.
I've been taking 2000iu daily for about a year. I'm thinking about bumping up to 4000iu oil based and maybe retesting a little down the road.
You will be lucky to get above 50 ng/ml at 4000iu per day, you may need at least 5000iu, however, going by your test at 2000iu per day It should get you well above 40 ng/ml. I guess its best to increase gradually and retest until you reach your goal.
I'm trying to get mine between 30 and 45 ng/ml, thats why I asked how long you had been taking 2000iu per day to reach 35.8. I know everyone's different but as a fellow night worker with limited sun exposure it gives a rough benchmark
cheers
Edited by Master Yoda, 02 May 2011 - 07:51 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users