• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Anthrax War


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Imminst = pro murder (omega)

  • Guest
  • 238 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Silicon Valley

Posted 01 July 2009 - 04:19 PM


Just watched all parts of this CBC documentary "Anthrax War" on Youtube. I'm not sure but I believe the doc. was first aired in May of this year. In the last segment a chief investigator suggests we need democratic control and monitoring to prevent an all out war on humanity using bioweapons such as weaponized anthrax. Seems to me that means we need to figure out what democracy means as so many tyrannical concerns call themselves democratic.

It is noted the defense funds of billions of dollars for bioweapon research has led to activities indistinguishable from offensive preparation.

I list just the first part on Youtube which leads to links to the other 6 parts. Go to the URL of the first part to get to the other parts. There appears to be at least one good torrent stream to get the total film happening now, not many seeders but they seem dedicated and are providing high bandwidth.




#2 Imminst = pro murder (omega)

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 238 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Silicon Valley

Posted 07 July 2009 - 08:12 PM

According to a July 6, 2009 article, top UK weapons inspector and anthrax specialist was writing an expose book when found dead in the woods in 2003.

A Parliamentary inquiry ruled that the death had been suicide, though it also included testimony from a former British ambassador who quotes Kelly as having said, “I will probably be found dead in the woods” if Iraq were invaded.


“he was intending to reveal that he warned Prime Minister Tony Blair there were no weapons of mass destruction anywhere in Iraq weeks before the British and American invasion… and was also intending to lift the lid on a potentially bigger scandal, his own secret dealings in germ warfare with the apartheid regime in South Africa.”


http://rawstory.com/...or-dead-expose/

Edited by Omega, 07 July 2009 - 08:13 PM.


#3 Rational Madman

  • Guest
  • 1,295 posts
  • 490
  • Location:District of Columbia

Posted 08 July 2009 - 01:34 PM

According to a July 6, 2009 article, top UK weapons inspector and anthrax specialist was writing an expose book when found dead in the woods in 2003.





http://rawstory.com/...or-dead-expose/


Wow, you're just discovering this story? The circumstances of David Kelly's death have been exhaustively examined by members of Parliament and the Hutton Inquiry. In each investigation, there were no signs of foul play. But, those that see conspiracies everywhere continue to cling to the idea of a government sponsored killing. Apparently, government incompetence and mismanagement is never a sufficient answer.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Advertisements help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. [] To go ad-free join as a Member.

#4 Imminst = pro murder (omega)

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 238 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Silicon Valley

Posted 08 July 2009 - 06:33 PM

There was an investigation by members of Parliament?

This new data bit, that David Kelly was planning a book detailing the lies of top gov. officials, that is old news to you despite it's just being released?

Appears highly likely you have an agenda of cross-thread posting targeting me. Seems misinforming and being hostile is your purpose.

#5 Imminst = pro murder (omega)

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 238 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Silicon Valley

Posted 08 July 2009 - 06:37 PM

Looks like the 2007 documentary "Dead in the Woods" goes into more on this anthrax war subject. If anybody finds a source for it online, please post a link.

#6 Rational Madman

  • Guest
  • 1,295 posts
  • 490
  • Location:District of Columbia

Posted 08 July 2009 - 07:31 PM

There was an investigation by members of Parliament?

This new data bit, that David Kelly was planning a book detailing the lies of top gov. officials, that is old news to you despite it's just being released?

Appears highly likely you have an agenda of cross-thread posting targeting me. Seems misinforming and being hostile is your purpose.


There were rumors about his desire to write either a book or article about the British government's reliance on faulty intelligence, and the intellectual dishonesty of some policymakers. And yes, besides the Hutton Inquiry, details about the case were independently investigated by members of Parliament.

Look, I'm simply exasperated by the continued public interest in conspiracy theories that have been thoroughly discredited. Usually, the methodology used by conspiracy theorists is deeply flawed, their arguments are often easily falsified and filled with fallacies of logic, they typically refuse to consider more credible explanations, and will often support their claims with evidence of little substance. So, because these criticisms characterize the dreadfully sloppy work of writers that continue obsess about the details of David Kelly's death, it should be clear why some people are deeply offended by the suggestion that the British government was involved in foul play.

It may surprise you that I don't really have an agenda. I was simply amused by the hysterical tone of many of your postings, and decided to respond some of your "serious" postings in a very frivolous way. Since you obviously have some problems, I've decided to ignore your rants unless you demonstrate a sincere desire to seek help. Once that happens, you'll find that my attitude will change dramatically.

Edited by Rol82, 09 July 2009 - 01:00 AM.


#7 Imminst = pro murder (omega)

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 238 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Silicon Valley

Posted 08 July 2009 - 08:17 PM

Some members of parliament conducted their own investigation and found evidence of foul play. Your categorical denial of such does not put much credibility to anything you state.

There was an official parliament investigation, an inquest, that was aborted claiming the Hutton report was all that was needed. The Hutton report is claimed as a first such style report, a gov. commissioned investigation into the death of a single individual, and the lack of a subpoena empowered inquest was quite suspicious in and of itself. See the press release of the Hutton report? One report by one old white haired guy is reason to not have an investigation?

See the BBC Conspiracy Files episode on the subject? They nicely lay out the arguments but I think their "experts" lampooning each seem to cater to the idea that conclusion trumps evidence. Really, amazing the video clips of that last expert pathologist, death implies there was enough blood loss and enough drugs taken. Amazing the reliance on cognitive relativism. A desired theory is sufficient to denounce any contrary evidence.

So far, I find nothing trustworthy in any of the communications I have seen from you.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Advertisements help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. [] To go ad-free join as a Member.

#8 Imminst = pro murder (omega)

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 238 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Silicon Valley

Posted 10 July 2009 - 02:09 PM

The documentary "Dead in the Woods" though released in 2007 appears to be totally unavailable, not for sale, not on torrent networks, not on Youtube or any other online video service. Major sites that discuss it have disappeared from the web.

Appears highly likely some very powerful and insane individuals are planning a massive murder of a large portion of humanity.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users