As of now it seems the only concrete way to enhance cognition via outside sources is with Nootropics and other non-noot supplements. But there is little, to no talk, on radical ways in the future to get much smarter. I've heard a few vague ideas tossed around about nanochips and I'm sure there will be psychotropic drugs in the future that will enhance mental ability. But this is all I know for now. Does anyone else now of any theories besides nanochips for mental augmentation? This thread is an attempt at gathering such theories, as I never am able to explain to people about these things very well.
Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.
Could we bring up ideas on mental augmentation here?
#1
Posted 11 July 2009 - 10:59 AM
As of now it seems the only concrete way to enhance cognition via outside sources is with Nootropics and other non-noot supplements. But there is little, to no talk, on radical ways in the future to get much smarter. I've heard a few vague ideas tossed around about nanochips and I'm sure there will be psychotropic drugs in the future that will enhance mental ability. But this is all I know for now. Does anyone else now of any theories besides nanochips for mental augmentation? This thread is an attempt at gathering such theories, as I never am able to explain to people about these things very well.
#2
Posted 11 July 2009 - 11:26 AM
It will be 60-80 years before noticeable cognitive enhancements through biochips, nanotech, etc, begins to become a reality (I base this on my engineering intuition, not any sources).
However, we do have the potential to achieve the singularity and defeat aging in our life time imo, which I think is extremely important so that we may live long enough to become augmented and thus live forever
But I can't wait until the day, like Kurzweil said, that you can go to your local 7-11 or something and you buy the latest Ph.D. download for your brain from the bargain bin
#3
Posted 11 July 2009 - 12:20 PM
sponsored ad
#4
Posted 11 July 2009 - 08:51 PM
Personally, If singularity is at most 40 years away then structural augmentation of the brain is near the same. I'm not saying that brain augmentation depends on singularity, but I am saying that once singularity arrives research in all areas of science will advance in an inhuman rate.
I think the first brain repair will come by repairing arteries that have been damaged by stroke. After we discover ways of repairing damaged areas of the brain, then we can discuss restructuring areas of the brain. We have to know how it works before we can change it.
Edited by bobscrachy, 11 July 2009 - 09:06 PM.
#5
Posted 12 July 2009 - 01:20 AM
So let's say you develop an external computing device that modifies neural activity using ultrasound. You could have the external neural device evolve over time and learn with the brain. So that way it would get increasingly efficient at altering brain activity. Perhaps the ultrasound could allow for a "two-way" communication as well. Ultrasound might be able to read brain signals and also manipulate them at the same time. I'm not quite sure how accurate ultrasound could be though in brain targeting. So this is highly speculative. It seems possible that we will see some brain technology based on ultrasound within 5-10 years.
Edited by Futurist1000, 12 July 2009 - 01:23 AM.
#6
Posted 12 July 2009 - 12:34 PM
But I can't wait until the day, like Kurzweil said, that you can go to your local 7-11 or something and you buy the latest Ph.D. download for your brain from the bargain bin
Will there be any likely conflicts between that and the law degree you got down at Costco?
#7
Posted 12 July 2009 - 01:29 PM
Will there be any likely conflicts between that and the law degree you got down at Costco?
hehehe hohoho hahaha
#8
Posted 12 July 2009 - 01:52 PM
lmfao!Will there be any likely conflicts between that and the law degree you got down at Costco?
But in all seriousness Costco is a good law school, my lawyer went there
#9
Posted 12 July 2009 - 07:20 PM
Will there be any likely conflicts between that and the law degree you got down at Costco?
when everyone has 1,000 Ph.Ds , will their brain explode, run out of space?
I prefer to buy my Ph.D downloads from Harvard, the legit one. Will there be illegal Ph.D file sharing? Free downloads of A Million PhDs to choose from
#10
Posted 12 July 2009 - 08:03 PM
when everyone has 1,000 Ph.Ds , will their brain explode, run out of space?
Just buy a better brain HD or whatever equivalent to HD we'll have then
I prefer to buy my Ph.D downloads from Harvard, the legit one. Will there be illegal Ph.D file sharing? Free downloads of A Million PhDs to choose from
That'd be fun. I keep saying over and over, those will be crazy and the most exciting times ever. I only hope to live long enough to be there.
#11
Posted 12 July 2009 - 08:19 PM
#12
Posted 12 July 2009 - 08:21 PM
That'd be fun. I keep saying over and over, those will be crazy and the most exciting times ever. I only hope to live long enough to be there.
....or, the most dangerous. Getting a graduate or postgrad degree isn't just about mastering one subject it's about being exposed to many. A person in college gets exposed to hundreds of ideas which in theory helps train them to be better able to make informed decisions. Unleashing this sort of expertise on people that haven't had the social maturity to handle it would be like handing over hydrogen bomb technology to north korea or iran.
#13
Posted 16 July 2009 - 05:22 AM
#14
Posted 19 July 2009 - 04:52 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users