• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

"nano nanu" mork was from another planet.........


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 thestuffjunky

  • Guest
  • 94 posts
  • -1
  • Location:kent ohio

Posted 30 July 2009 - 02:50 AM


so, the thought of machines taking out humans is scary when you see the movies. however, man is the forefront of life and sciences within the known animal kingdom of the universe, why would you doubt the abilities of cyborgs. cyborg= cybernetic organism. organism being any biological cell made for reproduction. with this, we will never be threatened by machines being the victor. nano technology NOW is just that NOW! keep in mind every other science NOW known to man and calculate the probabilities that all of them come together in some insane minute machine equations. nanobots exist and already repair ailed subjects and can sense issues that cant even be detected by the next best human technological machine. these nano docs are making human error a thing YOU will laugh at 1000 years from now. so, if there are machines now that are making machines(objects that have a known action to perform based upon a preknown command of mechanical operation), then we eventually place those into organic animals, the implications of cyborg(existence of life will remain organic until 100% machine). we cant ever stop fighting the existence of life. so you add immortality. all we need to build to defeat robots or nanobots is more better organic/mechanical bots to ALWAYS win. as long as man is alive and at least 1 smart brain is beating, we shall never be beaten by the technologies programmed to operate with 0% error and science progresses to never let man die, no matter what organic matter in the universe there is left of us, we will always be known as life living or exploring machine or a simple celled amoeba

Edited by derkee78, 30 July 2009 - 02:51 AM.


#2 Reno

  • Guest
  • 584 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Somewhere

Posted 30 July 2009 - 04:30 AM

I don't really understand what your trying to say. Are you comparing real life with a movie?

#3 thestuffjunky

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 94 posts
  • -1
  • Location:kent ohio

Posted 30 July 2009 - 06:44 PM

I don't really understand what your trying to say. Are you comparing real life with a movie?

i am saying that life itself will remain. when we can live forever, we will need to deal with this dilemma. but until then, man is the forefront of existence until we KNOW there is other civilizations out there. but if we can live forever by repairing damaged parts, then all we need to do is have a nanoboc with at least 1 biological cell smart enough to reproce humans and we shall live on... the potential is endless with what can be done if none of the smartest people/pioneers ever die

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 Reno

  • Guest
  • 584 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Somewhere

Posted 31 July 2009 - 08:04 AM

I agree that the future is full of potential. Nanotechnology is just part of that potential. It is up to each one of us to get an education and make the most out of our lives. Living for the sake of living has no meaning. That's why every day you have to decide to make the most out of the time you have and push yourself to your limits. After all, enjoying life is one of the main reasons most of us come here.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users