I think in the next 20 years more small animal organs, and perhaps some human organs, may be reversibly cryopreserved. The best scenario for cryonics would be improved, and possibly demonstrably reversible, cryopreservation of animal brains. It has been long observed that if reversible solid-state brain preservation could be demonstrated, then cryonics revival becomes a purely technical problem (albeit very complex one) of tissue regeneration. There would be no remaining doubt about whether the preservation itself was viably preserving human beings.
I think demonstration of effective cryopreservation of animal brains is absolutely essential for promoting the plausibility of cryonics to a larger market.
Tissue (stem cell and otherwise) regeneration is a rapidly growing field that is attracting considerable attention in the mainstream media (and the internet). The plausibility of regeneration of tissues, organs, and even of whole bodies is becoming more believable to the larger population. However, unless effective cryopreservation of the brain can be demonstrated, most people will continue to think of cryonics as the freezing of "dead" people and, as such, a rather bizarre form of internment.
This capability is essential for technical reasons as well. Effective whole body regeneration (and rejuvenation) is likely in this century. However, if the brain is not well-cryopreserved and reanimation requires the kind of molecular level forensics (Thomas Donaldson's "neuro-archeology") and repair, then you're looking at another 50-100 years before reanimation is possible (sorry Brian. some of us still don't buy into "dry" nanotechnology and need to conceive of how reanimation can be done without it).
Capsule time is bad time (you have no control over your destiny).
There are technical reasons that Brian can elaborate on as to why "reversible" whole body cryopreservation is not going to happen in the next 20 years.
Edited by kurt9, 30 September 2009 - 09:03 PM.