Niner, I see you have moved from the "I see no evidence whatsoever of forced vaccinations" to the "I see no attempt at forced vaccinations for the general public" camp. Obviously you have read of the multiple states now forcing health-care workers to take the vaccine.
I think it was only the state of New York, but I just want to be accurate.
I see more moves toward compulsory vaccinations everyday. I am not saying it is going to happen (or even greater than 50% chance, it is yet only a remote chance), but it is impossible to ignore the encroaching language from so many government officials (and of course the state and local actions). And, I am not intentionally trying to drum up some sort-of "red scare". It is just out there, the prospect of forced vaccinations, and it is interesting to watch from a social and historical perspective.
That declaration in the linked article doesn't seem to have anything to do with compulsory vaccinations. It is about allowing hospitals the flexibility to deal with an unusually large case load. I just don't see "forced vaccinations" for the general public out there
anywhere. What I do see is people raising the specter of them without any evidence, which really does seem like scaremongering.
The article did mention this, pointing out that H1N1 is far more lethal for children than the seasonal flu:
Health authorities are especially concerned about pregnant women, young adults and children. At least 95 children have already died from the virus, far more than usually die during an entire typical flu season.
Although immunocompromised people are undoubtedly in greater danger from this or any flu, most cases that I've heard of have involved secondary infections which can strike anyone.
Edited by niner, 24 October 2009 - 07:10 PM.