• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

b6


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
13 replies to this topic

Poll: b6 (20 member(s) have cast votes)

b6

  1. yes (19 votes [95.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 95.00%

  2. no (1 votes [5.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.00%

Vote

#1 ajnast4r

  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 148
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 29 October 2009 - 01:11 AM


b6

#2 ajnast4r

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 148
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 29 October 2009 - 01:59 AM

my suggestion is ~2mg, 150% dri as standard pyridoxine hydrocholoride

Edited by ajnast4r, 29 October 2009 - 01:59 AM.


#3 rwac

  • Member
  • 4,764 posts
  • 61
  • Location:Dimension X

Posted 29 October 2009 - 05:28 AM

my suggestion is ~2mg, 150% dri as standard pyridoxine hydrocholoride


I'd much prefer a few mg of p5p.

#4 ajnast4r

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 148
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 29 October 2009 - 05:35 AM

i wouldnt be opposed to another form of b6

read through this thread

#5 hamishm00

  • Guest
  • 1,051 posts
  • 93
  • Location:United Arab Emirates

Posted 29 October 2009 - 06:16 AM

what about both p5p and pyridoxamine together. That would be a first in any supplement and they have benefits unique to each.

#6 1kgcoffee

  • Guest
  • 737 posts
  • 253

Posted 29 October 2009 - 07:38 AM

what about both p5p and pyridoxamine together. That would be a first in any supplement and they have benefits unique to each.


What does pyridoxamine do that p5p doesn't?

#7 hamishm00

  • Guest
  • 1,051 posts
  • 93
  • Location:United Arab Emirates

Posted 29 October 2009 - 02:30 PM

It's a long read, but suggests that one may be better for overall glycation, the other for lipid glycation:

http://health.groups...fe/message/1978

Edited by hamishm00, 29 October 2009 - 02:32 PM.


#8 ajnast4r

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 148
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 29 October 2009 - 05:19 PM

pyridoxamine i believe would be more trouble than its worth legally

#9 FunkOdyssey

  • Guest
  • 3,443 posts
  • 165
  • Location:Manchester, CT USA

Posted 30 October 2009 - 09:22 PM

I would prefer that we use P5P and at a higher dose than that (not ALOT higher but more than 2mg).

#10 ajnast4r

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 148
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 30 October 2009 - 10:11 PM

I would prefer that we use P5P and at a higher dose than that (not ALOT higher but more than 2mg).


how much were you thinking? 5? 10?

#11 hamishm00

  • Guest
  • 1,051 posts
  • 93
  • Location:United Arab Emirates

Posted 31 October 2009 - 05:07 PM

You guys are right, I forgot about the legal issues with Pyridoxamine.

I reckon p5p, minimum 10mg

#12 ajnast4r

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 148
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 01 November 2009 - 03:13 AM

You guys are right, I forgot about the legal issues with Pyridoxamine.

I reckon p5p, minimum 10mg



why 10mg? is there some benefit to 10mg that wouldnt be seen at 4-5mg?

#13 Pike

  • Guest
  • 517 posts
  • 6

Posted 03 November 2009 - 01:06 PM

i second use of p-5-p

#14 shazam

  • Guest
  • 197 posts
  • 0

Posted 05 November 2009 - 06:24 AM

You guys are right, I forgot about the legal issues with Pyridoxamine.

I reckon p5p, minimum 10mg



why 10mg? is there some benefit to 10mg that wouldnt be seen at 4-5mg?


God I hope you're trying to cut costs for EVERYONE and not just the manufacturer.

Anyway, since the FDA is being an idea-looting bitch in tandem with the pharma industry, I say we just mix P.HCL and P5P in a 2:1 ratio ala b-right, possibly at a lower dose.

OR just go pure p5p. Dunno yet. If the dose for b6 turns out to be low, though I'd like to see more p5p than other forms.

Another form out there is PAK, though I haven't read up on it.

I don't get why we bothered with seperate topics on forms, everyone seems to be discussing forms in here anyway.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users