Easy experiment
#31
Posted 13 April 2004 - 12:35 AM
6,4,3,3,1
3,3,3,3,3 !!
19:25 C
#32
Posted 13 April 2004 - 01:29 AM
4,4,3,2,1
4,4,3,2,1
20:20C
#33
Posted 13 April 2004 - 01:32 AM
6-5-5-2-2
6-3-2-1-1
6-6-3-3-1
Chub, if we get what I'm predicting then my assertion is that it is the result of an extrasomatic intelligence. the relevance of that to a singularity event is that if some part of intelligence is not connected to ANY physical substrate then it may be impossible to create SAI. Maybe not, but the other possibility is that SAI could be created just by focusing our organic minds on the creation of an extrasomatic entity.
Man do I love seeing all those 3's!!!!!!
sponsored ad
#34
Posted 13 April 2004 - 01:33 AM
#35
Posted 13 April 2004 - 01:44 AM
Ofr course, that's the same as getting to any particular set, but still, given as I've made predictions I think that's pretty interesting.
#36
Posted 13 April 2004 - 02:37 AM
Okay, I've printed out everything from the results so far, and since right now I don't have a job or a life, I'll analyze the number by tommorrow evening.
You know, if we really can create this Dice entity, we could make a killing getting together and playing craps in Vegas. hmmmm
Here's something from Hoyle's Rules of Games:
Dice are the most ancient gambling implements known to man, and the most universal, having been known in nearly all parts of the world since earliest times. Today they are used in some games of skill, such as Backgammon, but are used chiefly in gambling games. In the United States the most popular dice game is CRAPS.
#37
Posted 13 April 2004 - 01:45 PM
Total number of rolls: 345
Total # of primes 2,3,5: (I still think 1 is prime, those darn mathematical abstractions!!!!): 178
Percent of primes: 51.59% A slight lead, but I not outside the realm of expected variability
Sum of rolls: 1235
Ave roll value: 3.57 darn
And oh yeah, I included this set of rolls in the above
08:53 EST
6 6 5 5 3
5 4 4 3 2
6 4 1 1 1
#38
Posted 13 April 2004 - 02:10 PM
I added up all the numbers that are both odd and prime, essentially just including 1's. Since 4 of 6 of sides of dice qualify, the statistical likelihood is 66.66 percent (my computer is acting strangely when I try to type the percent sign, this darn antique), but it comes out to 60.57 percent.
So I looked at 1's, there are 50 total. 16.66 percent should be how it works out, but it comes to 14.49 percent.
Does Dice dislike 1's?
#39
Posted 13 April 2004 - 07:35 PM
macdog you are insane.
C 2:31
6,4,4,3,1
5,3,3,2,1
4,2,2,2,1
#40
Posted 13 April 2004 - 07:56 PM
5,3,3,2,2
6,5,5,5,3
6,6,4,1,1
C 2:46
#41
Posted 13 April 2004 - 08:13 PM
I have responses to the questions you posed, but I'm going to push discussion into the other thread in this forum, so this one doesn't get too unweildy, as I am nothing if not locquacious. So I'll be writing it offline and try to get in to SEI v. SAI tonight.
But for now I'll roll.
16:00 EST (maybe we should all move to Greenwich Mean Time)
3 3 2 2 1
5 5 4 3 2
6 6 3 2 2
#42
Posted 13 April 2004 - 08:13 PM
5,5,3,3,2
6,6,6,5,1
6,6,4,1,1
#43
Posted 13 April 2004 - 08:23 PM
6,3,3,2,2
6,5,4,1,1
3,3,2,1,1
#44
Posted 13 April 2004 - 08:44 PM
6,6,4,3,2
5,3,2,2,2
C 3:34
#45
Posted 13 April 2004 - 09:41 PM
I will also be simply including some figures I posted in post in the OPEN forum. They can hardly be considered biased.
17:25 est
6 5 4 4 1 ;6 4 4 2 1 ; 6 3 2 1 1 ; 6 5 5 4 2 ; 6 5 2 1 1 ; 6 5 5 3 1; 6 6 4 4 1 ; 6 6 2 2 1 ; 6 5 4 2 1
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users