Incorrect. Has been presented, you simply choose to dismiss it because you disagree, and offered no rational but "you're wrong"
Link please?That I had the intelligence to see through the contradictions and lies simply speaks for how blinkered you have chosen to be.
You are indeed a shining example of intelligence.
But blinkered by what exactly? You seem to be labouring under the misapprehension that you know my opinion on the bible, Christianity and religion in general. I'm deeply critical of religion. I just happen to think your criticisms are facile and ideologically biased. See?If I could see through it, anyone can, provided they are willing to actually READ THEIR FRIGGIN HOLY BOOK as a book, and not with the preconceived notion that it must be okay if it's written in THERE.
Are you including me amongst those you perceive to think this way, or simply wandering off topic? I can't tell. Surely you can't have gotten the impression that I am guilty of such preconceptions, as I've never given you cause, and I know that you would never jump to conclusions in the absence of evidence to support your casually made assertions.If 3/4 of Christians KNEW what the Bible actually says instead of relying on others to tell them, there would be a lot fewer Christian hypocrites and a lot more actual Christians.
Correct. Also would have accepted 4/4, 1/4 or a pie chart.
Okay Ben, let me make this absolutely clear. I don't give a damn what your opinion is. I've had this argument with you previously, and refuse to indulge you further.
I have stated repeatedly that the institutions have no relation whatsoever to the individuals within those institutions. Individuals cover the spectrum of beliefs. Organized Hierarchies with established patterns of behavior and set dogmas are not the same thing. All your arguments come down to those of a religious apologist. You continually argue individuals when I discuss institutions. Nor am I the sole person you have done this too. Anything which does not meet your "criteria" for "acceptable criticism of Religion" you condemn. Go right ahead. I will continue to criticize it as much as I wish. Deal.
So, consider your input to be ignored from here on out.