• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Antibodies break the cell barrier


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Cyto

  • Guest
  • 1,096 posts
  • 1

Posted 14 April 2004 - 07:13 PM


Antibodies break the cell barrier

Superantibodies that can bind to targets within cells, rather than on their surface, could lead to a new range of treatments for diseases, a biotech company claims. "Most good targets for diseases are inside cells," says Charles Morgan, president of InNexus Biotechnology of Vancouver, Canada, which has developed the superantibody technology. Superantibodies could be used to target bacteria and viruses (including HIV) inside cells, for instance, or abnormal proteins that turn cells cancerous. In theory, they could do everything that the small molecules of most conventional drugs do, and more. The beauty of a cell-penetrating superantibody is that it would be highly discriminating. Because antibodies can be far more specific than small-molecule drugs, and because they are not inherently toxic, they should have fewer side effects. The big disadvantage is that antibodies have to be injected as they do not survive in the stomach.
Antibody-based treatments are already being used to treat diseases in several ways. Over a dozen are now approved for use in people. However, like natural antibodies, all bind to molecules on the surface of cells or viruses. Antibodies under development can ferry other substances into cells, such as the toxin ricin, and they are sometimes engulfed by a cell after binding to its surface proteins, but none can enter cells freely and target molecules inside them. However, InNexus says a simple chemical modification enables any antibody to flit in and out of cells until it finds its target. The "key" that allows them to enter is a short protein segment called a membrane-translocating sequence (MTS), normally found in signalling proteins such as growth factors that can enter cells.

Several groups worldwide have shown that attaching MTS segments to other proteins allows them to enter cells. "We thought, can you do this with an antibody?" says Morgan, who presented the technology at a BioVentures biotech conference in London earlier this month. InNexus found a way to attach an MTS segment to a structure common to all antibodies. "And lo and behold, it worked," he says. Experiments with a fluorescently labelled superantibody show it enters all cells but accumulates only inside cells containing its target, Morgan says. He thinks the antibodies could last in the body for up to a month, entering and leaving cells until they find their target. As a proof of principle, the company developed a superantibody that binds to and blocks caspase-3, an enzyme inside cells that triggers cell suicide. The superantibody stopped human white blood cells from killing themselves when they were exposed to actinomycin D, a drug that normally triggers cell suicide (Apoptosis, vol 8, p 631). InNexus hopes a superantibody of this kind can be developed to block cell death in people who have just had heart attacks or strokes. Some researchers have their doubts. "A lot of work has been done trying to make antibodies that are stable in cells," says Andrew Bradbury of the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. "But it's proved far more difficult than expected."

But Morgan says an antibody's stability depends on how it enters the cell. Those that are engulfed after binding to surface proteins end up in structures called endosomes, where they are likely to be destroyed. Superantibodies, however, enter the normal, safe environment of the cell. "There would definitely be loads of new targets if it worked," says Daniel Elger of biotech company Antisoma, based in London, which has developed an anti-cancer antibody that carries an enzyme into cells after binding to a surface receptor. But for purposes like blocking viral replication, the success of cell-penetrating superantibodies will depend on the concentrations they reach inside cells. "It would be down to the practicality of whether you could get enough in," he says.



#2 kevin

  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 14 April 2004 - 09:38 PM

This discovery would open up some exciting possibilities.. I can see it as being an application of the 'biopump' skin graft..

One would think that attaching MTS sequences to various proteins would also be a good strategy for getting other agents of change into the cell, not just antibodies..

To book this BIOSCIENCE ad spot and support Longecity (this will replace the google ad above) - click HERE.

#3 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 14 April 2004 - 11:32 PM

Yes, but if these superantibodies can cross cell membranes, does that mean they might also cross the semi-porous mucous membranes of our mouths, noses and genitalia? Could you get attacked by someone else's superantibodies just by kissing them or having sex with them? I would hope not.

I'm reminded of a Star Trek Next Generation episode where Dr Pulaski and Data visit a colony of genetically engineered teens and suddenly she starts suffering from premature aging. Finally they figure out that she's aging because her genome is being attacked by aggressive superantibodies from the children's immune systems, which travel thru the air and attack at a distance.

But wow, if these superantibodies from that article work, then any virus could be quickly targetted just by identifying unique sequences.

Suppose we found a way to insert artificial replacement chromosomes into a cell. You could use the superantibodies to eliminate the old chromosome that was being replaced.

Hey, regarding this Membrane Translocation Sequence -- could you use that to insert things that are larger than antibodies -- such as the aforementioned artificial chromosomes?

Heh, not all answers are immediately obvious right now, but I think eventually we will figure out enough tricks to totally re-make and replace the genomes of existing adult organisms. Then we could implement genomic changes that are so radical so as to re-engineer an adult organism's existing morphological structure. We will be totally able to change our shapes and bodies, even as mature adults.

#4 Cyto

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,096 posts
  • 1

Posted 15 April 2004 - 01:49 AM

Well, I like to call it Trans-Membrane Domain (TMD) but different reading material will do that.

This does sound like a great idea but virions do have that great ability to look like your genomes, promoter sequences and even mimic key methylation sites on the integrating or proximal DNA sequence. But I won't discount this finding, something could be worked out later.

Moving an entire chromosome into a cell sounds tricky. Since TMDs are apart of proteins you would have to cover the outer nucleic acid with a proteinaceous mass which would have a preference for the nucleus. Studying Bcl-2 which has a transmembrane domain that seems to prefer the ER/Nuc more then the mitochondria has a lesser basic residue makeup and fewer positive charges then say Bcl-xL which targets the mitochonria's outer mito membrane.

After the chromosome would enter in I would wonder if the dissociation of the TMD containing proteins would form inclusion bodies (insoluble particles) due to the hydrophobic domains clumping together, this aggregation would become a bioactive cytotoxic element. And we would require the proteins to already be highly resistant to proteolytic cleavage so...we may need to use something else.

Yes, but if these superantibodies can cross cell membranes, does that mean they might also cross the semi-porous mucous membranes of our mouths, noses and genitalia? Could you get attacked by someone else's superantibodies just by kissing them or having sex with them? I would hope not.


Good question, didn't think of that. I think its IgE dimers (using the J-protein binding) that we secrete now, I wonder if these superantibodies could do that too.

To book this BIOSCIENCE ad spot and support Longecity (this will replace the google ad above) - click HERE.

#5 chubtoad

  • Life Member
  • 976 posts
  • 5
  • Location:Illinois

Posted 13 May 2004 - 11:47 PM

http://www.scienceda...40513011352.htm

'Nanobodies' Herald A New Era In Cancer Therapy

The vast majority of the current medicines for treating tumors − the so-called chemotherapeutics − are seldom specific. Indeed, because a chemotherapy treatment is not only toxic to cancer cells but to the body's normal cells as well, patients often experience severe side effects. The VIB research team under the direction of Hilde Revets and Patrick De Baetselier (Department of Molecular and Cellular Interactions, Free University of Brussels) is searching − successfully − for new, specific, effective cancer therapies.

For several years now, the leading strategy in the treatment of cancer has been based on the production of antibodies, which are protective substances produced in the organism to defend against intruding foreign bodies − protecting us against infections arising from bacteria and viruses. Antibodies can also react with tumor-specific substances that appear only on the cancer cell membrane. These ingenious antibodies seek out and bind very specifically to the cancer cells. As a result, the tumor is removed in a highly targeted, specific manner. At the moment, ten such medicines are available to patients. But even though these antibody medicines are a good step in the right direction, there is clearly room for improvement. The antibodies that are being used are large proteins that have difficulty penetrating tumors. In addition, their complex structure makes large-scale production very difficult and expensive.

In order to cope with these problems, the VIB researchers are using camel antibodies. Extremely small compared to conventional antibodies, this unique class of antibodies has been renamed 'nanobodies'. Having all the advantages of the conventional antibodies, nanobodies also have several more important characteristics: they are small and they keep their tumor-specific character. At the same time, they are very stable, soluble proteins that are much easier and less expensive to produce than conventional antibodies. So, researchers have recently begun to evaluate nanobodies as anti-cancer medicines. The first results look promising: in experiments conducted on mice, a tumor with a certain protein on its membrane was successfully counteracted through administration of a nanobody directed against this protein.

To translate these results into a possible application for humans, VIB is collaborating with Ablynx, a company established by VIB and GIMV in 2001 with the aim of marketing the nanobody technology. Today, Ablynx has already developed nanobodies against 16 different therapeutic targets that represent a wide range of diseases in humans. Two of these nanobodies are in the pre-clinical phase and, according to plan, will be ready to be clinically tested next year.

These recent results are a new step toward the development of medicines based on nanobodies. In addition to cancer, other life-threatening diseases − such as certain inflammatory diseases, or heart and vascular diseases − are possibly eligible for a medical treatment with nanobodies.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users