reasons for or against?
trace minerals
Started by
ajnast4r
, Nov 05 2009 01:29 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 05 November 2009 - 01:29 AM
reasons for or against?
#2
Posted 05 November 2009 - 05:02 AM
What trace minerals?
#3
Posted 05 November 2009 - 08:44 AM
What trace minerals?
He probably means a '72 trace mineral complex' since he didn't specify.
Aj, I don't think there's a hell of a lot of evidence out there pointing for or against them just yet. I do know that the soil is getting a little depleted, so adding say,
4-10mg of something like concentrace would not be something I would fight to the death.
Edited by shazam, 05 November 2009 - 08:45 AM.
#4
Posted 11 November 2009 - 03:39 AM
... anybody else wanna throw in their two cents? It would be a neat feature (4mg should be fine in retrospect). However this IS one of those things somebody could supplemetn on their own from concentrace.
#6
Posted 15 November 2009 - 09:11 PM
Lithium is quite interesting. Unfortunately it is likely to be labeled as a pharmaceutical drug regardless of dose in almost all nations due to use in bipolar disorder.Anyone wants to review the evidence re. lithium? Probably not worth the trouble? (see for a start)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users