And frankly, I still worry about oxidized cholesterol from dietary or internal production (less so). Even if you have sky high HDL -- it can still be damaged (maybe from a postprandial trig jump after huge fat intake?? who knows).
At least in your health program you intermittantly fast -- which could possibly be protecting you from constant postprandial surges in trigs. And remember, your blood vessels have a much larger tolerance when you are younger, what happens when you start reaching your 90s in terms of the postprandial trig surges.
I hope more research comes out in this area.
Really glad to see more and more evidence (and re-evaluation of previous evidence) showing that saturated fat is not associated with heart disease, or any negative conditions.For those that don't follow the "paleo blogs," check out this new meta analysis in the AJCN finding that there is no significant evidence for concluding that dietary saturated fat is associated with an increased risk of CHD or CVD. Read it here. This should be a big deal for those among us that place great deal of value on the consensus opinion. This review is the consensus moving and, oops, saturated fat is no longer bad.
It just makes zero sense that saturated fat would be a negative health concern. Finally, science is catching up with common sense.
What I'm waiting for now is for the pendulum to swing in the other direction, and for more and more studies that indicate humans are healthier when we consume saturated fat. In other words, saturated fat is not a neutral fat--it's a healthy fat. In fact, low HDL (<40) should be considered as a deficiency in saturated fat intake.
Give nutritional science 20 years, and this will be accepted wisdom.














