Occasionally I check in on the Health Ranger, because, once in a blue moon, he does have something smart to say. But not this time. In one of his most recent articles he includes this:
I've bolded the two in which the Unhealthy Ranger makes critical blunders.Many people in the natural health arena need a better understanding of this: There are lots of things that are quite good for you in their unprocessed form. It's the processing that makes them bad for you.
For example:
Processed sugar cane is bad. Raw sugar cane is good.
Processed salt is bad. Unprocessed, full-spectrum sea salt is good.
Processed cow's milk is bad. Fresh, raw cow's milk is good.
Processed chocolate can be a junk food. Raw, natural cacao is a superfood!
Processed wheat is bad for you. Stone-ground whole wheat can be good for you.
Processed soy milk is bad. Natural, home-made soy milk is good.
Processed cheese is bad. Natural, home-made cheese is far less so.
Processed (canned) fruits are bad. Raw, fresh fruits are good for you.
First, sugar is sugar. Raw sugar might have a phytonutrients in it, but that doesn't by any stretch make it "good" for humans. Anyway, I strongly suspect that the Health Ranger is not aware of the negative effects of fructose, which is why last year, he proclaimed on his site that agave is the most healthy of all natural sugars, in large part because it has a low GI value. Well, that's because agave is some 80 percent fructose. And yet, the "Health" Ranger recommends this!?!
Secondly, wheat, among grains, is perhaps the worst in terms of health. And it just doesn't matter if the wheat is processed or whole. The belief that whole grains are good is one that needs to reversed. It fooled me years ago too. It's still fooling the Health Ranger. Watch this to see how fast whole grain bread is converted to sugar:
More on Wheat.