http://www.cbsnews.c...in6422159.shtml
it's being broadcast right now on TV, and the video will be available within 30-60 mins.
Edited by prophets, 25 April 2010 - 11:25 PM.
Posted 25 April 2010 - 11:24 PM
Edited by prophets, 25 April 2010 - 11:25 PM.
Posted 25 April 2010 - 11:29 PM
Posted 26 April 2010 - 12:09 AM
Posted 26 April 2010 - 12:39 AM
Posted 26 April 2010 - 10:45 AM
Yes indeed, that's SOP for reporting about drugs. News is entertainment, first and foremost.50% seems a little high to me and I recently went to a college where I'd imagine it would have above average use. I'd bet the vast majority of that 50% have only done it once or twice.
Edited by chrono, 26 April 2010 - 10:45 AM.
Posted 26 April 2010 - 12:22 PM
Posted 26 April 2010 - 12:47 PM
So is the program heavily negative?
Posted 26 April 2010 - 02:03 PM
So is the program heavily negative?
Edited by Rain, 26 April 2010 - 02:04 PM.
Posted 26 April 2010 - 05:30 PM
Posted 27 April 2010 - 07:59 PM
So is the program heavily negative?
The only negative thing mentioned in the entire thing was that the long-term effects on congitive function are not known.(and mentioned the blood pressure/heart effects for a second)
Otherwise quite positive and interesting to know that the Harvard professor takes pills haha!
I really want to try adderal it sounds like ritalin (sounds good as), but i keep hearing how its similar to modafinil which isn't that good at all:p
Posted 11 May 2010 - 01:19 AM
Posted 11 May 2010 - 11:53 AM
Edited by synapse, 11 May 2010 - 11:57 AM.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 02:28 PM
seems that all of the mainstream media stories on cognitive enhancers just focus on prescription meds. not sure if it makes the story more sensational or what. never hear about the racetams or any of the others in these stories.
i have spoken personally with a couple of the big networks and invariably the discussions turn to prescription meds- they don't seem particularly interested in some of the alternatives that are arguably much more effective and have little if any addictive qualities.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 03:23 PM
It is a big claim, and this is probably milking his definiton of 'alternatives' but I think you could indeed very easily make a good argument for:seems that all of the mainstream media stories on cognitive enhancers just focus on prescription meds. not sure if it makes the story more sensational or what. never hear about the racetams or any of the others in these stories.
i have spoken personally with a couple of the big networks and invariably the discussions turn to prescription meds- they don't seem particularly interested in some of the alternatives that are arguably much more effective and have little if any addictive qualities.
Much more effective? That's a big claim don't you think. Most college-students use Adderall and Ritalin to increase their GPA and their ability to learn new material. Not everybody responds to racetams and other vitamins, so I would like to hear some backing on this huge claim.
Regards
Posted 11 May 2010 - 03:29 PM
It is a big claim, and this is probably milking his definiton of 'alternatives' but I think you could indeed very easily make a good argument for:seems that all of the mainstream media stories on cognitive enhancers just focus on prescription meds. not sure if it makes the story more sensational or what. never hear about the racetams or any of the others in these stories.
i have spoken personally with a couple of the big networks and invariably the discussions turn to prescription meds- they don't seem particularly interested in some of the alternatives that are arguably much more effective and have little if any addictive qualities.
Much more effective? That's a big claim don't you think. Most college-students use Adderall and Ritalin to increase their GPA and their ability to learn new material. Not everybody responds to racetams and other vitamins, so I would like to hear some backing on this huge claim.
Regards
A really good diet,
Regular exercise,
Quality sleep,
Food supplements: Blueberries, Green Tea, etc,
Supplements: Fishoil, Magnesium, Vitamin D, etc,
Nootropics: Piracetam, Choline, ALCAR, Lithium, etc,
.................................................................................... (is greater than) > Adderall and/or Ritalin
Now admittedly I fudged the issue a little, but let's face it the vast majority of students don't do more than 1 or 2 things off that list-if any-so I think the point is valid.
Edited by synapse, 11 May 2010 - 03:32 PM.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 05:11 PM
It is a big claim, and this is probably milking his definiton of 'alternatives' but I think you could indeed very easily make a good argument for:seems that all of the mainstream media stories on cognitive enhancers just focus on prescription meds. not sure if it makes the story more sensational or what. never hear about the racetams or any of the others in these stories.
i have spoken personally with a couple of the big networks and invariably the discussions turn to prescription meds- they don't seem particularly interested in some of the alternatives that are arguably much more effective and have little if any addictive qualities.
Much more effective? That's a big claim don't you think. Most college-students use Adderall and Ritalin to increase their GPA and their ability to learn new material. Not everybody responds to racetams and other vitamins, so I would like to hear some backing on this huge claim.
Regards
A really good diet,
Regular exercise,
Quality sleep,
Food supplements: Blueberries, Green Tea, etc,
Supplements: Fishoil, Magnesium, Vitamin D, etc,
Nootropics: Piracetam, Choline, ALCAR, Lithium, etc,
.................................................................................... (is greater than) > Adderall and/or Ritalin
Now admittedly I fudged the issue a little, but let's face it the vast majority of students don't do more than 1 or 2 things off that list-if any-so I think the point is valid.
I think there is sufficient evidence on the ImmInst forums alone! icantgoforthat's 'alternative' regimen is far superior than taking an amphetamine based drug. Cognitive enhancement (esp long-term) is much more than simply taking amphetamines. In fact, amphetamines alone will likely only create obstacles to cognitive enhancement over the long run.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 08:35 PM
It is a big claim, and this is probably milking his definiton of 'alternatives' but I think you could indeed very easily make a good argument for:seems that all of the mainstream media stories on cognitive enhancers just focus on prescription meds. not sure if it makes the story more sensational or what. never hear about the racetams or any of the others in these stories.
i have spoken personally with a couple of the big networks and invariably the discussions turn to prescription meds- they don't seem particularly interested in some of the alternatives that are arguably much more effective and have little if any addictive qualities.
Much more effective? That's a big claim don't you think. Most college-students use Adderall and Ritalin to increase their GPA and their ability to learn new material. Not everybody responds to racetams and other vitamins, so I would like to hear some backing on this huge claim.
Regards
A really good diet,
Regular exercise,
Quality sleep,
Food supplements: Blueberries, Green Tea, etc,
Supplements: Fishoil, Magnesium, Vitamin D, etc,
Nootropics: Piracetam, Choline, ALCAR, Lithium, etc,
.................................................................................... (is greater than) > Adderall and/or Ritalin
Now admittedly I fudged the issue a little, but let's face it the vast majority of students don't do more than 1 or 2 things off that list-if any-so I think the point is valid.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 08:42 PM
Edited by czukles, 11 May 2010 - 08:43 PM.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 08:50 PM
He's making the argument that the combination of those elements listed are superior to adderall or ritalin alone.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 09:30 PM
Posted 11 May 2010 - 09:34 PM
Stimulants have many shortcomings. They are addictive and users can become dependent. Tolerance occurs and decreases the potential benefits. The long-term effects of some these drugs on cognitive function is not known. This is a big risk to take.
Perhaps the better argument to make is that a healthy lifestyle coupled with a good supplement regimen enhances/preserves cognitive function without the consequences of long-term stimulant use.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 09:38 PM
Edited by synapse, 11 May 2010 - 09:47 PM.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 10:09 PM
I would also argue that neither adderall nor ritalin would be considered "nootropics" in the traditional sense.
See the wikipedia entry on nootropics for a general intro. The word was first coined by Corneliu E. Giurgea in 1972. He stated that nootropic drugs should have the following characteristics:
1.They should enhance learning and memory.
2.They should enhance the resistance of learned behaviors/memories to conditions which tend to disrupt them (e.g. electroconvulsive shock, hypoxia).
3.They should protect the brain against various physical or chemical injuries (e.g. barbiturates, scopalamine).
4.They should increase the efficacy of the tonic cortical/subcortical control mechanisms.
5.They should lack the usual pharmacology of other psychotropic drugs (e.g. sedation, motor stimulation) and possess very few side effects and extremely low toxicity.
Source: Giurgea C (1972). "[Pharmacology of integrative activity of the brain. Attempt at nootropic concept in psychopharmacology] ("Vers une pharmacologie de l'active integrative du cerveau: Tentative du concept nootrope en psychopharmacologie")" (in French). Actual Pharmacol (Paris) 25: 115–56. PMID 4541214.
Posted 12 May 2010 - 12:45 AM
Firstly, if you reread my original wording (actually ill retype it) I said 'make a good argument for'. Secondly, of course no hard evidence exists to support that position, but its not within the realm of possibility a study could ever be performed that would. Thirdly, I can totally respect your position re 'statements that are not backed up by evidence' and often argue that view myself. But these are the drawbacks from being on the cutting-edge of science, if you need an RCT to prove its a good idea to look left and right before you cross the road, then good luck to you!First off MPH/DexMPH are not amphetamines.It is a big claim, and this is probably milking his definiton of 'alternatives' but I think you could indeed very easily make a good argument for:
A really good diet,
Regular exercise,
Quality sleep,
Food supplements: Blueberries, Green Tea, etc,
Supplements: Fishoil, Magnesium, Vitamin D, etc,
Nootropics: Piracetam, Choline, ALCAR, Lithium, etc,
.................................................................................... (is greater than) > Adderall and/or Ritalin
Now admittedly I fudged the issue a little, but let's face it the vast majority of students don't do more than 1 or 2 things off that list-if any-so I think the point is valid.
Can you show me studies that prove taking the above vitamins/supplements > stimulants?
I do not believe they exist, and I am calling your bluff.
Posted 12 May 2010 - 02:47 AM
Firstly, if you reread my original wording (actually ill retype it) I said 'make a good argument for'. Secondly, of course no hard evidence exists to support that position, but its not within the realm of possibility a study could ever be performed that would. Thirdly, I can totally respect your position re 'statements that are not backed up by evidence' and often argue that view myself. But these are the drawbacks from being on the cutting-edge of science, if you need an RCT to prove its a good idea to look left and right before you cross the road, then good luck to you!First off MPH/DexMPH are not amphetamines.It is a big claim, and this is probably milking his definiton of 'alternatives' but I think you could indeed very easily make a good argument for:
A really good diet,
Regular exercise,
Quality sleep,
Food supplements: Blueberries, Green Tea, etc,
Supplements: Fishoil, Magnesium, Vitamin D, etc,
Nootropics: Piracetam, Choline, ALCAR, Lithium, etc,
.................................................................................... (is greater than) > Adderall and/or Ritalin
Now admittedly I fudged the issue a little, but let's face it the vast majority of students don't do more than 1 or 2 things off that list-if any-so I think the point is valid.
Can you show me studies that prove taking the above vitamins/supplements > stimulants?
I do not believe they exist, and I am calling your bluff.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users