• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
* * * - - 2 votes

living longer with reduced taxes on vegetarian restaurants


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 treonsverdery

  • Guest
  • 1,312 posts
  • 161
  • Location:where I am at

Posted 07 May 2010 - 11:53 PM


living longer with reduced taxes on vegetarian restaurants
It ocurred to me that if taxes on purely vegetarian restaurants were removed then the 3 to 7 year longevity bonus of being vegetarian as well as knowledge of tasty vegetarian foods would be brought to more people, Amazingly the (near 1999) difference between the wealthiest n poorest (possibly quartile) of US citizens was just seven years, the opportunity to create an economic stimulus that promotes tasty new vegetarian foods is thus comparable to most of the 14-16 pt of GDP medical industry. I strongly favor medical research as well as authentic medical benefit it just amazed me that all of that effort, that trillion dollars a year, might actually have a functional equivalent as removing taxes on purely vegetarian restaurants as well as purely vegetarian mini marts. It could be that a few billion of omitted taxation is worth trillions of dollars of omitted medical treatments.

I am a casual opportunistic eater I consider snack foods vegetarian because they are, even if they are loaded with yummy sugar + lots of oil, I am thinking of McDonalds just starting a vegetarian franchise group precisely, only, because removing the taxes doubles their profit margin compared with meat. I like the idea, I support the idea of knowing how to eat well, I'm just aware that its like choosing say a variety of music you only like some because well, its beneficial.


I've viewed a part of what taxes are used for; as a government employee I earned a modest living doing vaguely useful things, vaguely. As a Quaker pacifist I see that 150 years of "defense" spending when the most recent meaningful military action at North America was during the 19th century , now it is the 21st century. There are bombs that can do the job better than people, there is a congressional directive to replace infantry with electromechanical devices about 4.5 years from now. personlessPowersuit+segway+wireless plus the most meaningful idea: eradication is more ethical than conquoring; to conquor persons previously used fear, territory, aggression to control economic flows; eradication is the more just defense: anesthetize then delete all personnel.

I think the sum of all Federal revenues should be less than a fourteenth of all combined personal or corporate earnings; I think the province like states have the opportunity to ask their voters if those voters will permit revenue of value less than a tenth of all earnings; I also believe that every person has the right to refuse taxation with the provision that they be immediately deported to the country of their choice.

Notes:
Near 1999 the federal government supplied less than 7 pt of the education budget; I urge the wider variety of thought that a provincial state based approach brings
The military which accounted for a fifth of the federal budget near 1999 has actually been absent the necessity of killing another person since 1861 during the civil war
Social security could be constructed on a provincial state basis where the variety of states could offer a variety of retirement options

that actually represents more than half of all US 1999 Federal annual outlays; if we just admit to being peaceful people with local character life will be happier.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users