• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo

Who can solve this maths?


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 7000

  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 27 August 2004 - 08:19 PM


Who can solve this?




X-square is directly proportional to Y
X-square = Y-square
X = Y end.

X-square is directly proportional to Y

X-square is equal to Y-square

X is equal to Y end.




I think someone will be able to solve this before... but now, i will like to work with the American government.

When dynamics is put in place, we have a universal equation base on decison.

Who can solve this maths?

Yours sincerely
7000.

Edited by 7000, 29 August 2004 - 04:31 PM.


#2 th3hegem0n

  • Guest
  • 379 posts
  • 4

Posted 31 August 2004 - 10:54 PM

man you must smoke some real good bud...

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#3 nootropi

  • Guest
  • 1,207 posts
  • -3
  • Location:Arizona, Los Angles, San Diego, so many road

Posted 11 September 2004 - 03:37 AM

Who can solve this?

X-square is directly proportional to Y
X-square  =  Y-square
X   =  Y  end.

X-square is directly proportional to Y

X-square is equal to Y-square

X is equal to Y end.


Easy: it is the same thing twice;)

Attached Files

  • Attached File  x_y.gif   5.53KB   0 downloads

Edited by nootropi, 11 September 2004 - 05:42 AM.


#4

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 11 September 2004 - 10:43 AM

man you must smoke some real good bud...


[:o]

I know there is something to Mr. 7000's posts in general, perhaps I just can't comprehend them correctly.

Edited by cosmos, 11 September 2004 - 06:04 PM.


#5 rahein

  • Guest
  • 226 posts
  • 0

Posted 11 September 2004 - 05:30 PM

x and y both = 1

1^2 = 1
1^2 = 1^2
1 = 1

#6 heinlein

  • Guest
  • 8 posts
  • 0

Posted 12 September 2004 - 01:39 PM

man you must smoke some real good bud...


[:o]

I know there is something to Mr. 7000's posts in general, perhaps I just can't comprehend them correctly.


Don't doubt your intelligence Cosmos. Why this incessant yearning to search for meaning where there is none?

7000's "equations" have meaning only to himself - and that probably is, "how many responses can I provoke from these forum users by posting nonsensical pseudoalgorithms?"

[sleep]

#7

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 12 September 2004 - 02:12 PM

Actually, based on the number and length of his posts typed in such an abstract manner I would guess there is a meaning to some of it.

He had made some long threads with long posts where he was essentially the only forum member posting in his threads, to be fair to 7000 I think he is simply trying to disseminate information in his own unique way.

#8 rahein

  • Guest
  • 226 posts
  • 0

Posted 12 September 2004 - 04:23 PM

7000 what is your native language?

#9 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 12 September 2004 - 08:18 PM

In a given system of proportional representative (PR) X=Y.

It is clearly notice that X and Y are criteria of different entity.
The constant of proportionality are not thesame state.They are of seperate independent existence.

Even though they are of thesame alphabetical order.

Just like you saying;
X-square is directly proportional to X.
Y-square is directly proportional to Y.
Y is equall to X-square divided by K.
Y-square is equall to X-power 4, divided by K-square.
X-square is equall to X-power 4, divided by K-square.
X- power 4 is equall to X-square multiply by K-square.
X-square is equall to K-square.
X-square = K-square = Y-square.



However, it is about the knowledge part of it.

You make it complex, try to make it simple and not simplier.

Can you solve the knowledge part of it?

Yours sincerely
7000.

Edited by 7000, 15 September 2004 - 01:45 PM.


#10 Clifford Greenblatt

  • Member
  • 355 posts
  • 4
  • Location:Owings Mills, MD

Posted 13 September 2004 - 09:46 AM

Who can solve this?




X-square is directly proportional to Y
X-square  =  Y-square
X  =  Y  end.

X-square is directly proportional to Y

X-square is equal to Y-square

X is equal to Y end.




I think someone will be able to solve this before... but now, i will like to work with the American government.

When dynamics is put in place, we have a universal equation base on decison.

Who can solve this maths?

                                                                                              Yours sincerely
                                                                                                          7000.


X^2 = Y^2 and X = Y reduce to X = Y
X^2 =K*Y then reduces to Y = K or X = Y = 0
Therefore X = Y = K or X = Y = 0

#11 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 13 September 2004 - 01:23 PM

7000 what is your native language?


Does language make sence to you?

Does language really make sence?

Will my native language be relevant?

Even if i say my native language, you cannot understand a single damn thing... out of it!

And these are the reasons why AI is going to speak or read minds.

If you ask...,its from south west of Nigeria.

Yours sincerely
7000

Edited by 7000, 14 September 2004 - 07:44 PM.


#12 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 13 September 2004 - 01:39 PM

Nootropi said it is the same thing twice.Rahein said it is 1.Clifford greenblatt said it is 0.

Well, your answer has something to do with the solution, but i don't think it is 0.

If it is 0, there is no solution.

Yours sincerely
7000.

#13 jaydfox

  • Guest
  • 6,214 posts
  • 1
  • Location:Atlanta, Georgia

Posted 13 September 2004 - 08:21 PM

[FONT=Arial]

X-square = Y-square
X = Y end.


As a matter of formality, these two statements taken together tell us nothing. If X=Y, then by definition, X^2 = Y^2.

X-square is directly proportional to Y

By saying directly proportional, you could be saying one of two things. Either:

X^2 = Y
or
X^2 = kY, with k constant.

The first case is really just the special case where k=1.

The first case, X^2=Y, when combined with the other criteria, namely X=Y and X^2=Y^2, gives answers of (0, 0) and (1, 1) for (X, Y). Both solutions work equally well.

In the second case, X^2 = kY, the solutions are (0, 0) and (k, k), where k is the constant of proportionality.

But I'm not sure where you were going with this. This is elementary algebra, and I have the feeling that you were looking for something deeper. Care to explain?

#14 Clifford Greenblatt

  • Member
  • 355 posts
  • 4
  • Location:Owings Mills, MD

Posted 14 September 2004 - 09:30 AM

Nootropi said it is the same thing twice.Rahein said it is 1.Clifford greenblatt said it is 0.

Well, your answer has something to do with the solution, but i don't think it is 0.

If it is 0, there is no solution.

                                                                                              Yours sincerely
                                                                                                          7000.

X = Y = 0 was only one of the solutions I indicated. The other solution was X = Y = K. This completetely agrees with the solution given by jayfox.

#15 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 14 September 2004 - 07:38 PM

Every human has a state in a universal equation.If 1 mind is positive[+ve] the other 1 is negative[-ve]
The positive mind is driven by knowledge and the negative 1 is driven by dynamics.

jaydfox, it is still the same all through.You haven't solve the knowledge part of it.
If there is perfection in dynamics, there must be dynamics in perfection.

Mr Clifford Greenblatt, i acknowledge your effort, but X=Y.
When X and Y are zeros, X and Y are undefine.
This is a beginning without end and it is the end of another beginning.

There are 6 state of being, 3 are instinct and the other 3 are extinct.

This is word and technology.

Yours sincerely
7000.

Edited by 7000, 15 September 2004 - 10:16 AM.


#16 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 15 September 2004 - 10:37 AM

QUOTE (jaydfox) But I'm not sure where you were going with this. This is elementary algebra, and I have the feeling that you were looking for something deeper. Care to explain?



I'm aware that elementary algebra as a grass root in maths.Should we say the elementary algebra is stasis.

You can only know that is elementary algebra only when you have solved it.
"You make it complex, try to make it simple and not simplier."

It's just a fundamental aspect of an AI.

                                                                                                Yours sincerely
                                                                                                           7000.


Edited by 7000, 15 September 2004 - 10:54 AM.


#17 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 27 September 2004 - 12:29 PM

Description:

We have reduction state and upgrade state.What each of them state is very important.


Direction:

This state is either "That" or "In" where "In" is almost the same as "At" but "At" is not within the reach and "That" is within the reach.

Yours sincerely
7000.

#18 Infernity

  • Guest
  • 3,322 posts
  • 11
  • Location:Israel (originally from Amsterdam, Holland)

Posted 09 February 2005 - 08:01 PM

7000, according to your math problem, I was wondering- how old are you...? and what is that problem has to do with the American government?

~Infernity

#19 John Schloendorn

  • Guest, Advisor, Guardian
  • 2,542 posts
  • 157
  • Location:Mountain View, CA

Posted 10 February 2005 - 08:42 AM

and what is that problem has to do with the American government?

Neither of them does anything for life-extension?

#20 jaydfox

  • Guest
  • 6,214 posts
  • 1
  • Location:Atlanta, Georgia

Posted 10 February 2005 - 04:18 PM

and what is that problem has to do with the American government?

Neither of them does anything for life-extension?

Smarta— [wis] [tung]

#21 ingenius

  • Guest
  • 1 posts
  • 0

Posted 10 February 2005 - 06:10 PM

I consider myself good at math, but this problem is more theoretical.

#22 Infernity

  • Guest
  • 3,322 posts
  • 11
  • Location:Israel (originally from Amsterdam, Holland)

Posted 10 February 2005 - 06:25 PM

ingenius, this problem is quite easy.
but I still don't understand what does it have to do with the American government, and what does the American government have to do with life-extension...

~Infernity

Edited by infernity, 16 May 2005 - 06:22 PM.


sponsored ad

  • Advert

#23 7000

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 172 posts
  • 0

Posted 13 February 2005 - 02:01 PM

Not only to the American government, also to the British government.But can someone tell me what is going on at invent-tech.

I think i fax a rough sketch and a brief description of the math.

Titled:Space reflex point mathematics on artificial intelligent.

Date:8-11-04

File:#682994.

Yours sincerely
7000.

Edited by 7000, 13 February 2005 - 02:25 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users