Please do not construe this as anything malicious directed towards a religion I once partook in and continue to scrutinize. It has occurred to me that a simple and, most importantly, succinct proof of inaccuracy would be invaluable for freeing those who squander their time trying to sort out this mess which is the bible.
I’ll make this short:
Should the story of Noah’s ark have been accurate, obviously all of earth’s animals, apart from those which swim (etc.), must have propagated from a single point post-flood. They then would have had to make the massive pilgrimage to their current habitats all across the world. So how is it that not a single animal has been found out of its respective climate? An animal can traverse the world to become isolated to a particular region, but leave no evidence of such a journey?
What about fossil sequences? Not a single fossil has ever been discovered out of sequence relative to whatever stratum (denoting segments of time). NOT ONE. Clearly if you suppose that they were all created over the span of a week and coexisted that’d elicit a major question: what is the statistical improbability that, of the millions of animals, not one would become fossilized out of sequence?
And genome mapping?
Genomes arranged into a “family tree” segue seamlessly from simplicity into complexity as if deliberately built to deceive us.
And let us not forget about speciation: Why are animals on oceanic islands most similar to those which inhabit the nearest land mass? Why are these islands only populated by those animals which could plausibly arrive there? An example would be the impossibility presented for frogs: their eggs die immediately once exposed to saltwater. And, despite ideal environments waiting for them, god never planted them in these perfect-but-inaccessible oases.
And now to tie it off…
If a god like that which is portrayed in the bible exists, then how can he retain his infallible and loving judgment by condemning those who don’t share a faith to hell? Everything in the world seems to point away from god. If they clearly have no reason to believe other than a fabricated paucity of ambiguous events, how can a righteous judge condemn them?
Well he couldn’t could he?