http://www.msnbc.msn...rime_and_courts
now imagine the publicity and the uproar if it was an arab who did the shooting.
Posted 09 October 2010 - 01:56 PM
Posted 09 October 2010 - 02:11 PM
Posted 10 October 2010 - 04:45 AM
Well, he was a psycho, carrying a Jack-o-lantern and a gun. Crazy people come in all flavors. They didn't actually mention his ethnicity or nationality. How do you know that he wasn't Arab? When I lived in Southern California, I had a lot of Arab friends and acquaintances. It was not a big deal, but that was in the 1980s. I don't know if it's changed now.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39582428/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts
now imagine the publicity and the uproar if it was an arab who did the shooting.
Posted 10 October 2010 - 09:51 AM
Posted 10 October 2010 - 02:03 PM
Yeah, I know what you're saying. Arabs have gotten a bad rap because of Islamist terrorism. If school kids had been shot at by a Muslim, crazy or not, that would have been huge news, because everyone would think it was terrorism. Violence by non-Muslim psychos, on the other hand, well, that just happens; particularly in America where we hand out guns to practically anyone. I think the Rwandan massacre and the worlds response to it was a disgraceful episode, but the appropriate analogy would be one Arab sect killing another Arab sect in a far off land that few had heard of. It might have gotten a similar response, although the Middle East is more familiar to Westerners than is Africa, so that would have raised the level of interest somewhat.maybe you misunderstood me mate. My point was, an Arab or Muslim killer is worldwide news, a 'normal' non muslim Killer isn't.
Thinking even further, how many more people would have cared about the Rwandan massacre if one of the parties was of muslim or arab origin? May I suggest, ALOT more than current interest in the horrendous massacre?
Posted 10 October 2010 - 03:06 PM
Yeah, I know what you're saying. Arabs have gotten a bad rap because of Islamist terrorism. If school kids had been shot at by a Muslim, crazy or not, that would have been huge news, because everyone would think it was terrorism. Violence by non-Muslim psychos, on the other hand, well, that just happens; particularly in America where we hand out guns to practically anyone. I think the Rwandan massacre and the worlds response to it was a disgraceful episode, but the appropriate analogy would be one Arab sect killing another Arab sect in a far off land that few had heard of. It might have gotten a similar response, although the Middle East is more familiar to Westerners than is Africa, so that would have raised the level of interest somewhat.maybe you misunderstood me mate. My point was, an Arab or Muslim killer is worldwide news, a 'normal' non muslim Killer isn't.
Thinking even further, how many more people would have cared about the Rwandan massacre if one of the parties was of muslim or arab origin? May I suggest, ALOT more than current interest in the horrendous massacre?
A relatively small number of violent extremists has tarred entire an entire ethnicity. It sucks...
Posted 10 October 2010 - 08:54 PM
maybe you misunderstood me mate. My point was, an Arab or Muslim killer is worldwide news, a 'normal' non muslim Killer isn't.
Posted 10 October 2010 - 09:30 PM
maybe you misunderstood me mate. My point was, an Arab or Muslim killer is worldwide news, a 'normal' non muslim Killer isn't.
Do you live in San Diego, CA?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users