http://news.blogs.cn...ne-home/?hpt=C2
NASA is planning to hold a news conference Thursday "to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life."
Posted 01 December 2010 - 06:37 PM
Posted 01 December 2010 - 08:08 PM
Posted 01 December 2010 - 10:10 PM
I wouldnt get my hopes up. It could be something about extremophiles.
Posted 02 December 2010 - 03:50 AM
Posted 02 December 2010 - 12:19 PM
Posted 02 December 2010 - 12:56 PM
Yep, highly unexciting.It is about extremophiles found in an arsenic lake.
Posted 02 December 2010 - 05:00 PM
Edited by forever freedom, 02 December 2010 - 05:03 PM.
Posted 02 December 2010 - 06:25 PM
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3253913/NASA-researchers-find-life-in-poisonous-arsenic-lake-in-USA.html
If this is what it's about, it's not very exciting indeed. Of course we shouldn't be expecting that NASA would say that an alien smiled and waved its hand at one of it's robot explorers.
Posted 02 December 2010 - 08:19 PM
Posted 02 December 2010 - 08:26 PM
I am pretty ignorant of biology so I have to ask this. Does the arsenic based microbes mean that they arent related to any other lifeform on Earth? That would mean that life on Earth had to start twice.
Posted 02 December 2010 - 08:31 PM
Posted 02 December 2010 - 11:03 PM
Posted 03 December 2010 - 04:38 AM
Posted 03 December 2010 - 05:15 AM
Personally, I think this is a pretty big deal. Ever since we've known about DNA, there was only one kind, a chain of base-bearing deoxyriboses linked by phosphates. Now we've found a new kind of DNA where the riboses are linked by arsenates. Chemically, it's not a huge surprise, but it's a concrete example of life based on alternative chemistry. It switches the discussion from "gee, it ought to work in theory, but no one's ever seen it" to something that we know works. It might not seem like much, but for some people it's a big mindset change. The fact that the arsenate gets incorporated in DNA carries a lot of emotional weight with people. There was always this big question in everyone's mind regarding how the genetic information was stored in the alien life form that we will eventually find. Will it be DNA? Must it be? Now we have a suggestion that the chemistry of life is more fluid. It opens up the design space for life, and expands not only what we might look for, but our thinking about it.
Posted 03 December 2010 - 05:37 AM
Personally, I think this is a pretty big deal. Ever since we've known about DNA, there was only one kind, a chain of base-bearing deoxyriboses linked by phosphates. Now we've found a new kind of DNA where the riboses are linked by arsenates. Chemically, it's not a huge surprise, but it's a concrete example of life based on alternative chemistry. It switches the discussion from "gee, it ought to work in theory, but no one's ever seen it" to something that we know works. It might not seem like much, but for some people it's a big mindset change. The fact that the arsenate gets incorporated in DNA carries a lot of emotional weight with people. There was always this big question in everyone's mind regarding how the genetic information was stored in the alien life form that we will eventually find. Will it be DNA? Must it be? Now we have a suggestion that the chemistry of life is more fluid. It opens up the design space for life, and expands not only what we might look for, but our thinking about it.
I would have thought it a lot more interesting if it wasn't just an evolutionary adaption. I would have been excited if this announcement was about a separately developed life form, not a derived one. We still only know of one line of life, ie. life originated only once on this planet and nothing has happened to change that view. Given the ideal conditions on this planet, why did it only happen once??This does not bode well for extraterrestrial life forms since in 4 billion 'good' years, life has only 'started' once.
Edited by suspire, 03 December 2010 - 05:39 AM.
Posted 03 December 2010 - 06:03 AM
to something that we know works.
Edited by eternaltraveler, 03 December 2010 - 06:07 AM.
Posted 03 December 2010 - 06:12 AM
Posted 06 December 2010 - 02:30 PM
The idea of organisms using arsenic is not new. I have certainly seen speculation on this possibility in the past.
Posted 07 December 2010 - 02:57 AM
Devil in the Dark!The idea of organisms using arsenic is not new. I have certainly seen speculation on this possibility in the past.
It reminds me of that episode of star trek that totally debunks carbon as the main component of life.
Posted 15 December 2010 - 05:41 PM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 06:27 AM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users