I think they restrict choline to get the fatty livers--or at least, choline deficiency is what triggers that problem.
Regarding methionine, I have been following this whole thing as well, and I don't think the reports are necessarily conflicting. Here's why: Restricting methionine in the diet is not the same as starving cells of methionine. In the study you cited, GreenTea, where GSH increased in response to treatment with methionine and cysteine, the treatment was made to
cultured cells. In the studies that showed
benefits from restricting methionine, the restriction was applied to the diet of living rats/mice.
What happens when you restrict methionine in a living organism is that it causes the organism to perform some level of biosynthesis, and/or protein scavenging to supply the needed methionine to cells. Cultured cells don't have access to these pathways by virtue of their isolation from the larger organism. It might very well be that the adult body, when starved of methionine, produces
more cell-available methionine than it would normally, causing an increase in GSH by the very same mechanisms produced in the cell culture experiment.
It also may be that the process of producing methionine internally (in the absence of dietary methionine) is itself beneficial to the organism, since methionine production involves the recycling of homocysteine back to methionine; and also since it may be that some amount of autophagy of long-lived, but damaged proteins is required to produce new proteins when they are in short supply from diet.
So the way I see it, there are at least three separate paths by which dietary methionine restriction may afford the positive effects of CR: 1) by kicking the organism into a kind of "overdrive," where it produces
more cell-available methionine than it was previously getting from diet; 2) by forcing the organism to recycle homocysteine; and 3) by forcing the organism to recycle damaged, but marginally-usable long-lived proteins to get the building blocks for methylation, thus promoting the generation of new proteins to replace the old.
In all of these cases, the organism would need optimal levels of choline and B vitamins to do this work, and for at least some populations, NAC might also be a factor (needed, though; not avoided). I haven't seen enough research on the NAC connection, but I do recall seeing one study that indicated that some people are missing some gene necessary to produce GSH optimally, and I'm
speculating that NAC could help in those cases.
I am currently experimenting with trying to keep my dietary methionine under 1 g per day, which is, admittedly, not as low a percentage as what the rats were getting.
I'm also taking choline, because I don't get enough of it in my diet. I have only been doing this for a couple of months, so it's too soon to know anything except that it is
really hard to avoid methionine in your diet!
I'm definitely interested in hearing others' opinions on this subject. There's obviously a lot of research that has not yet been done but should be...