• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

Stress Shortens Telomeres


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 29 November 2004 - 11:19 PM


Here's an interesting article:

http://www.newscient...p?id=ns99996732

"There was no difference in the telomere length of the two groups, but women in both groups who reported the most stress also had the shortest telomeres. And the effect was so large that it represented nine to 17 years’ worth of cell ageing."


Wow, 17 years is a lot -- we're talking about 20% of your lifespan! We've often heard about how stress is bad for your health, but I thought that this was harming you at the larger macroscopic tissue structure level, ie. blood vessel integrity, heart valve integrity, etc.

I never knew that psychological stress could harm you on the cellular level.

#2

  • Lurker
  • 1

Posted 30 November 2004 - 12:38 AM

Long term psychological stress can impact adrenocorticoid regulation which not only will affect glucose metabolism and consequently all the glucose related CR type of effects but also will downgrade immune response which has implications for increased infectious disease and cancer susceptibility.

Click HERE to rent this GENETICS advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 manofsan

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 30 November 2004 - 12:42 AM

Okay, so keeping in the happy middle is best. It's not like you could lengthen your lifespan beyond the norm by listening to mall music and grinning all day. :)

But it would be nice to specifically see the underlying mechanism being conclusively commented upon by them, rather than just hearing that the telomeres are shorter.

#4

  • Lurker
  • 1

Posted 30 November 2004 - 12:51 AM

You can figure it out for yourself by examining (using pubmed) which genes are transcriptionally modulated by stress physiology, look at other genes affected downstream and then correlate this information with what genes are known to regulate telomeres.

#5 olaf.larsson

  • Guest
  • 583 posts
  • 21
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 30 November 2004 - 05:35 PM

I can´t belive that people that are supposed to be scientist in the field actually still belive telomere shortening is aging. I guess it becouse its a nice and easy theory spread in the popular science press for 15 years now.

#6 manofsan

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 30 November 2004 - 07:18 PM

Well, wolfram, the thing is that there's no hard quantitative means of measuring the state of aging of an organism, so that's probably why they're using the telomeres as the metric.
Obviously, there's no way to change the chronological age of something. And there's no clear metric for biological age, so we have to go with telomere length.

#7 Lazarus Long

  • Life Member, Guardian
  • 8,116 posts
  • 242
  • Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York

Posted 30 November 2004 - 11:52 PM

Here is the NY Times take on this same issue but I would add that we are not talking about mutually exclusive concepts if telomere shortening results is one example of cumulative damage, in this case resulting in obvious aging.

I have personally experienced sudden stress related aging for some of the reasons mentioned in this study and it is providing an explanation of the mechanisms involved. The damaging effects of stress are cumulative and systemic. Telomeres probably represent only one system failure and I suspect that together with others it only adds to the acceleration of onset aging.


http://www.nytimes.c...artner=homepage
Posted Image

Too Much Stress May Give Genes Gray Hair
By BENEDICT CAREY
Published: November 30, 2004

Some stressful events seem to turn a person's hair gray overnight.

Now a team of researchers has found that severe emotional distress - like that caused by divorce, the loss of a job, or caring for an ill child or parent - may speed up the aging of the body's cells at the genetic level.

The findings, being reported today, are the first to link psychological stress so directly to biological age.

The researchers found that blood cells from women who had spent many years caring for a disabled child were, genetically, about a decade older than those from peers who had much less caretaking experience. The study, which appears in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, also suggests that the perception of being stressed can add years to a person's biological age.

Though doctors have linked chronic psychological stress to weakened immune function and an increased risk of catching colds, among other things, they are still trying to understand how tension damages or weakens tissue.

The new research suggests a new way that such damage may occur and opens the possibility that the process can be reversed.

"This is a new and significant finding," said Dr. Bruce McEwen, director of the neuroendocrinology laboratory at Rockefeller University in New York.

He said the research provided some of the clearest evidence yet "of the price in wear and tear on the tissues that everybody pays during a stressful life."

"And we know as we get older," Dr. McEwen continued, "we have a greater tendency to put on fat, to develop heart disease and diabetes."

In the experiment, Dr. Elissa Epel and Dr. Elizabeth Blackburn of the University of California at San Francisco led a team of researchers who analyzed blood samples from 58 young and middle-aged mothers, 39 of them caring for a child with a chronic disorder like autism or cerebral palsy. Using genetic techniques, the doctors examined the DNA of white blood cells, which are central to the body's immune response to infection.

The scientists focused on a piece of DNA, called the telomere, at the very tip of each cell's chromosomes.

Like the head of a split matchstick, the telomere shrinks each time a cell divides and duplicates itself.

Cells may reproduce themselves many times throughout life to repair and strengthen their host organs, to grow or to fight disease.

A chemical called telomerase helps restore a portion of the telomere with each division.

But after 10 to 50 divisions or so - the number varies by tissue type and health, and biologists still do not understand the system well - the telomere gets so short that the cell is effectively retired and no longer able to replicate.

People born with a genetic disease called dyskeratosis congenita, which causes accelerated shortening of telomeres, die young, usually by middle age, most often as a result of complications from weakened immunity.

Change in telomere length over time, in short, is thought to be a rough measure of a cell's age, its vitality.

And when the researchers compared the DNA of mothers caring for disabled children, they found a striking trend: after correcting for the effects of age, they calculated that the longer the women had taken care of their child, the shorter their telomere length, and the lower their telomerase activity.

Some of the more experienced mothers were years older than their chronological age, as measured by their white blood cells.

"When people are under stress, they look haggard, it's like they age before your eyes, and here's something going on at a molecular level" that reflects that impression, said Dr. Blackburn, a professor of biochemistry and biophysics.

The researchers also gave the women a questionnaire, asking them to rate on a three-point scale how overwhelmed they felt by daily life, and how often they were unable to control the important things in their lives. The women who perceived that they were under heavy stress also had significantly shortened telomeres, compared with those who felt more relaxed - whether they were raising a disabled child or not.

"Some of the women who had a lot of objective, real stress also had a low perceived amount of stress, and the next step is trying to understand what it is that promotes this kind of resilience," said Dr. Epel.

She said the group had plans to test the effect of meditation, mindfulness training and yoga on both perceived stress and telomere length.

A form of counseling called cognitive therapy, in which people learn to temper their responses to stress, could also help, psychologists say.

Personality and upbringing almost certainly account for some of this difference, however. In 2003, researchers who followed some 850 New Zealanders from birth to 26 reported that variations in a single gene helped predict which children would later become susceptible to depression, after stressful events like divorce or unemployment.

Researchers at the National Institutes of Health have shown, in monkeys, that warm and attentive rearing of offspring can protect young animals from precisely this genetic variation, promoting resilience in genetically vulnerable individuals. Cold or abusive rearing, psychiatrists say, can have the opposite effect.

"All of these factors intertwine to make up how a person handles stress," said Dr. Ronald Glaser, director of Ohio State University's Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, who with his wife, Dr. Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, has documented the effect of stress on immune function. "We now have evidence, from a broad range of fields, from studies of wound healing, of inflammation, of vaccines, and now of cell age that really make the case" that stress can cause real harm.

Experts caution that the telomere study needs to be replicated and that no one has yet shown convincingly that psychological stress significantly shortens people's lives. And it is far from clear exactly how fretting over a child's learning disability, say, can cause a parent's telomeres to shorten before their time. Although researchers know that emotional strain of this kind prompts the release of stress hormones, like cortisol, which over time can damage cells, no one knows how these hormones or other stress-related toxins affect telomeres.

"Right now, that is the black box," said Dr. Blackburn, "and that's what we're going to study next."



#8 olaf.larsson

  • Guest
  • 583 posts
  • 21
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 01 December 2004 - 10:53 AM

If telomeres were central for aging long lived animals would have long telomeres and shortlived would have short telomeres. This is clearly not the case. Mice have much longer telomers than humans yet they live much shorter. Im looking forward to an experiment in which telomerase expression is trigged on, in somatic cells in an adult mouse. First the mouse have become tolerised to telomerse as young or be a SCID-mouse so it not gets an severe autoimmune reaction, I guess. I wonder why this rather simple experiment has not been done yet?

#9 Lazarus Long

  • Life Member, Guardian
  • 8,116 posts
  • 242
  • Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York

Posted 01 December 2004 - 01:43 PM

Wolfram it is my understanding that when we discuss telomere shortening it is not the length of the specific telomere that is the primary issue but the rate at which they shorten over replication and how many replications are possible.

Many animals (principally arthropods and reptiles) have telomeres that do not shorten and as a consequence it appears these animals experience two very interesting results, they don't appear to suffer a significant incidence of cancers and they also appear to delay senescence.

Telomere length certainly varies from species to species but one suggestion for why a mouse might start out with longer telomeres than humans is that they probably shorten at a significantly greater rate during mitotic cell division. If they shortened faster then mice would be shorter lived and more subject to mutation, especially if a faster metabolism caused a greater rate of cell division to begin with, even though they start with a longer telomere at birth.

So if they are replicating their cells faster and also shortening the telomere slightly more with each replication then a mouse that began with longer telomeres would age faster than another species like humans that begin with a shorter telomere but *budget* them over their life with a slower rate of cell division and lose a smaller proportion per division.

This is merely a logical conjecture on my part but it should be a testable hypothesis.

#10 Lazarus Long

  • Life Member, Guardian
  • 8,116 posts
  • 242
  • Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York

Posted 01 December 2004 - 02:16 PM

Here is a question that is probably answerable from the data available out there.

Do most if not all species with faster metabolisms and shorter lives also have proportionally longer telomeres at birth?

If so, could this simply be the result of an adaptive strategy?

While some species have adapted to optimize their physiology to environment, some have adapted by being better at adapting and do so by having a genome that is able to respond to environmental stress with a faster mutation rate. These species tend to be smaller, have faster metabolisms, and shorter lives regardless of their phyla. I wonder if there is a clear correlation across species and phyla to telomere shortening that can be identified for these species.

They might all start with longer telomeres that shorten more with a faster rate of cell division. If so then we may be witnessing a background adaptive mechanism at work, which may be better understood as a generational issue than an individual one. One that may be both encrypted in the DNA and modifiable.

It is no small irony then that we may be looking at a real life example of the fabled race between the tortoise and hare.

Victory goes not to the swiftest but to the most *steady* (or stable) if *winning* is seen as achieving the longest life. :))

Click HERE to rent this GENETICS advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#11 olaf.larsson

  • Guest
  • 583 posts
  • 21
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 01 December 2004 - 06:15 PM

"Many animals (principally arthropods and reptiles) have telomeres that do not shorten and as a consequence it appears these animals experience two very interesting results, they don't appear to suffer a significant incidence of cancers and they also appear to delay senescence. "

Yeah it would be interesting to check the hayflick limit for this creatures. I have heard sometime that sharks don´t get cancer but appearently they get cancer sometimes.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users